Skip to main content
Tenders

Rahu Bridge Repair

Open
Deadline
24 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
308067
Value
€161,290
Location
Estonia
Published
March 26, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€161,290
Duration
3 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The technical description of the public procurement is provided in the annex to the tender documents.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The tender is for the repair of Rahu bridge.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-20 06:00:00.
--The contract duration is 3 months.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm they do not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
--If applicable, provide power of attorney for joint bidders and explain business secrets.
--The bidder's self-declaration (Hankepass) serves as initial proof of meeting qualification requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Detailed requirements for granite plinth and stair repair, and concrete slab installation are provided in the technical specification.
--The tender includes a detailed list of works and quantities for the Rahu bridge repair in the offer table.
--The works are functionally interdependent and aimed at achieving the same goal; splitting them is technically and economically impractical, leading to management difficulties and significant additional costs.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The lowest price will receive the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
308067_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the conditions for controlling subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on the occurrence of fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking.

VastavustingimusedPDF
308067_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.5 KB

The bidder must confirm that no subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation will be involved, and if applicable, provide a joint bidder authorization and explain any business secrets.

PakkumustabelXLS
pakkumustabel.xlsx -- 68.7 KB

The bid table details the list of works and quantities for the Rahu bridge repair, which the bidder must complete.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308067_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

In the Rahu bridge repair tender, Tartu City Government will evaluate the bid price, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
308067_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 66.7 KB

The tender pass is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence of meeting the qualification requirements set by the contracting authority, but it is not filled out directly in this document.

AlusdokumentDOC
Alusdokument_Rahu_sild.docx -- 30.7 KB

This foundational document outlines the tender conditions, submission requirements, and procurement process for the Rahu Bridge repair, serving as the basis for bid submission.

LepinguprojektDOC
Lepingu projekt.docx -- 52.4 KB

This draft work contract outlines the terms, obligations, and penalty clauses for the Rahu Bridge repair works, forming the basis of the agreement with the successful bidder.

Tehniline kirjeldusXLS
Tehniline kirjeldus_28012025.xlsx -- 56.7 KB

The technical specification outlines detailed requirements for the Rahu Bridge repair works, including instructions for repairing granite plinths and stairs, and installing concrete slabs.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the Rahu bridge repair is generally well-structured with clear technical specifications and financial information. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on external documents for full understanding.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The absence of disputes and the organization's status suggest good regulatory compliance. The procedure type 'A' (Open procedure) is standard.

Clarity80/100

The technical requirements are detailed in attached documents, which is standard practice. The description clearly states the purpose of the tender and the rationale for not dividing it into lots. The evaluation criteria are mentioned as 'relative_weighting', implying a need to consult further documentation for specifics.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the full technical details and contract terms are in separate documents, which slightly reduces immediate completeness. The 'Hankepass' is mentioned as not being filled out directly in the provided document.

Fairness85/100

The tender is open to all bidders, with a clear evaluation criterion of lowest price. The exclusion of bidders with connections to the Russian Federation is a geopolitical consideration rather than company-specific tailoring. Full document access is implied through the e-procurement platform.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are standard. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, only the duration. Financing information is not detailed. The reliance on external documents for full understanding impacts immediate practicality.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU-funded, which might explain the lack of specific sustainability mandates.

No explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation.

Strengths

Clear technical specifications provided in attached documents.
Well-defined financial information and timeline.
Standard open procurement procedure with clear exclusion criteria.
E-submission and e-procurement facilitated.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria.
Reliance on multiple external documents for full understanding.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.

Recommendations

1. Consider incorporating specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, material sourcing).
2. Provide a consolidated document or clearer links to all essential information, including contract start date.
3. Clarify the 'relative_weighting' evaluation criteria in the main tender document or a readily accessible annex.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline