Skip to main content
Tenders

Reconstruction of the district heating pipeline in Turba settlement

Open
Deadline
26 days left
April 22, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
308064
Value
€1,740,647
Location
Estonia
Published
March 25, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost excluding taxes100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 15, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 22, 2026

Tender Opening

April 22, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 29, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€1,740,647
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Reconstruction of the district heating pipeline in Turba settlement.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (7)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--A bid price table must be submitted containing detailed costs for the district heating pipeline reconstruction works.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be associated with the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must confirm they will not engage subcontractors or suppliers associated with the Russian Federation.
--Bidders must provide information regarding trade secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Materials must comply with EN-EVS standards or be equivalent.
--All references to specific standards, certificates, or manufacturers must include the note "or equivalent".
--Bidders must submit a list of similar construction works performed in the last 60 months, involving the construction or reconstruction of at least 0.5 km of pre-insulated pipeline with a diameter of at least DN 200 mm.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Evidence of the company's net turnover must be provided to assess its financial capacity.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

13 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
308064_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.0 KB

The bidder must confirm that no subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation will be involved and provide information regarding trade secrets.

Lisa 3. Netokäibe tõendDOC
Lisa 3 Netokäibe tõend.doc -- 29.5 KB

This document requires proof of the company's net turnover to assess its financial capability for tender participation.

Lisa 4. Pakkuja sarnased töödDOC
Lisa 4 Pakkuja sarnased ehitustood.docx -- 25.4 KB

Bidders must provide a list of similar construction works completed in the last 60 months, involving the construction or reconstruction of at least 0.5 km of pre-insulated piping with a diameter of at least DN 200 mm.

Lisa 5 Pakkumuse hinnatabelXLS
Lisa 5 Pakkumuse hinnatabel.xlsx -- 23.1 KB

This document is a bid price table detailing the costs for district heating pipeline reconstruction works.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308064_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
308064_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 15.1 KB

This tender document outlines the exclusion grounds and qualification conditions required for participation in the reconstruction of the Turba village district heating pipeline tender.

HankedokumentDOC
Hankedokument.docx -- 44.8 KB

The tender document includes instructions for bidders and technical specifications for the reconstruction of the district heating pipeline in Turba settlement.

Lisa 1.1 soojavõrgu plokkskeemPDF
Lisa 1_1 Soojusvõrgu plokkskeem.pdf -- 346.6 KB

This document presents a block diagram of the district heating pipeline reconstruction in Turba settlement, illustrating pipeline layout and dimensions.

Lisa 1.2 TP spetsifikatsioonDOC
Lisa 1_2 TP_Spetsifikatsioon.doc -- 418.0 KB

This document contains technical specifications for the reconstruction of the district heating pipeline in Turba settlement, which are necessary for tender submission.

Lisa 1.3 Saue valla kiriPDF
Lisa 1_3 Saue valla kiri.pdf -- 157.6 KB

The Saue Municipal Government agrees to leave the old heating pipeline and concrete channels in the ground during the reconstruction of the Turba heating pipeline, except under Lille street, where they must be removed.

Lisa 2 Ehituse töövõtulepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Ehituse töövõtulepingu projekt.docx -- 50.3 KB

This draft construction contract defines the terms, rights, and obligations between the client and the contractor for the reconstruction of the Turba village district heating pipeline.

Lisa 6_1 Ehituse dokumentatsiooni sisukordXLS
Lisa 6_1 Ehituse dokumentatsiooni sisukord.xl... -- 13.8 KB

The tender document outlines the construction documentation required to commence the reconstruction of the district heating pipeline in Turba settlement, including schedules, work safety plans, qualification certificates, and technological maps.

Lisa 6 Nõuded ehitusdokumentatsioonileDOC
Lisa 6 Nõuded ehitusdokumentatsioonile.docx -- 32.1 KB

The contracting authority requires the submission of construction documentation, including work schedules, a work safety plan, necessary permits, insurance, and documentation proving personnel composition and specialist qualifications.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the reconstruction of the Turba district heating pipeline is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation based on price. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has some minor practical drawbacks regarding document accessibility.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and the financing source is identified. No disputes are noted. The exclusion grounds related to the Russian Federation are a specific regulatory requirement.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, and technical requirements are well-documented, including specific standards and the 'or equivalent' clause. Evaluation criteria are stated as relative weighting, primarily based on price. Conditions for participation are specified.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. Key documents like technical specifications, qualification requirements, and bid price tables are attached or referenced. However, some crucial documents like the full work project (.zip) and construction permit (.asice) were not fully analyzable by AI, potentially impacting completeness for bidders relying solely on AI analysis.

Some critical tender documents (.zip, .asice) were not fully analyzable by AI, potentially hindering immediate bidder understanding.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The evaluation criteria are objective (primarily price), and the value is disclosed. The 'or equivalent' clause in technical specifications promotes broader participation. The exclusion of bidders associated with the Russian Federation is a specific geopolitical requirement, not company-tailored.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are positive. The contract start date is specified. Financing information is provided. However, the accessibility of some technical documents in non-standard formats (.zip, .asice) might pose a practical challenge for bidders.

Some technical documents are in formats (.zip, .asice) that may require additional steps or software for bidders to access and analyze.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The timeline for tender validity and contract start is consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded, which often implies adherence to certain sustainability standards. However, there are no explicit requirements for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents themselves. The financing condition mentions the European Regional Development Fund, which may have associated sustainability goals.

Lack of explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Clear technical specifications with 'or equivalent' clause
Objective evaluation criteria (primarily price)
E-submission and e-procurement enabled
EU funding identified

Concerns

Some critical tender documents not fully AI-analyzable
Limited explicit sustainability requirements
Potential practical issues with document formats

Recommendations

1. Ensure all tender documents are provided in universally accessible formats.
2. Consider incorporating explicit sustainability criteria in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline