Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Tartu Traffic Study 2026

Open
Deadline
3 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
308031
Value
€35,500
Location
Estonia
Published
March 26, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of work100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 26, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€35,500
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€100,264
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
87%
624 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to collect, update, and analyze traffic data for the city of Tartu and to update the urban traffic model (including the creation of a city-wide daily average traffic map – AKÖL), in order to provide high-quality input for Tartu's strategic noise map for 2026.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

60%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for the Tartu Traffic Study 2026 is heavily weighted towards cost, making price a critical success factor. Bidders must submit a highly competitive, low-cost proposal while meticulously adhering to all submission and compliance requirements. Differentiation will be challenging but can be achieved through demonstrating exceptional efficiency and a clear understanding of the project's core objective: providing quality input for the 2026 strategic noise map.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-Effective Excellence: Delivering high-quality traffic data and modeling for Tartu's 2026 strategic noise map at the most competitive price.

Precision and Compliance: A meticulous approach to data, analysis, and submission, ensuring full adherence to all tender requirements.

Key Opportunities
Leveraging efficient methodologies to drive down costs.
Focusing on the core objective of supporting the strategic noise map.
Streamlining data collection and analysis processes.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting.

Conduct a thorough cost analysis to identify all possible efficiencies and overhead reductions. Explore partnerships or shared resources if feasible to further reduce costs without compromising quality. Be prepared to bid at a very low margin.

Lack of specified technical capability requirements may lead to a wide range of bidder quality.

While not explicitly evaluated, subtly demonstrate technical competence through the clarity and professionalism of the bid proposal and any supporting documentation. Highlight experience in similar projects.

No explicit emphasis on innovation, social value, or green procurement.

Focus efforts on the primary evaluation criterion (cost) and essential compliance. Avoid over-investing in areas not directly rewarded by the evaluation.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A lean, efficient consultancy or research firm with proven experience in traffic data collection and modeling, capable of delivering high-quality analysis at a highly competitive price point. They should have streamlined operational processes to minimize overhead and maximize cost-effectiveness.
Key Requirements
Confirmation of agreement to all terms of the tender documents and submission according to the specified structure.
Electronic submission of the bid.
Compliance with Hankepass (ESPD) requirements.
Submission by the deadline: 2026-04-07 07:00:00.
Lowest cost bid for maximum score.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrating a clear understanding of how the traffic data directly contributes to the strategic noise map, showing a focus on the client's ultimate goal.
A highly professional and error-free bid submission that instills confidence in the bidder's attention to detail and reliability, even with a low price.
Social Value Opportunities
While not a requirement, consider a brief mention of how the traffic data analysis might indirectly support sustainable transport planning or reduce noise pollution, framing it as a positive byproduct of the core service.
Bid Focus Areas
Cost of work100.0%

Develop a highly competitive pricing strategy. Conduct a granular cost breakdown to identify all areas for optimization. Aim for the lowest possible bid while ensuring the project can be delivered profitably, even with slim margins. Clearly articulate the value proposition at this price point.

Recommendations5
Aggressively Price for the Win
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% cost weighting, the primary strategy must be to submit the lowest possible price. Conduct a detailed cost-benefit analysis of your operational processes to identify areas for maximum efficiency and cost reduction. Be prepared to accept very slim profit margins.

Directly maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion.
Meticulous Compliance and Submission
CriticalMed effort

Ensure absolute adherence to all mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and submission instructions. Double-check all documentation for completeness and accuracy, especially the Hankepass (ESPD). A single error can lead to disqualification.

Prevents disqualification and ensures the bid is considered.
Understand the 'Why' Behind the Data
HighLow effort

While not explicitly evaluated, demonstrate a clear understanding of how the collected traffic data and updated model will serve as 'quality input for Tartu's 2026 strategic noise map'. This shows client focus.

Subtly differentiates the bid by showing strategic alignment.
Scenario Planning for Cost Underestimation
HighMed effort

Develop a contingency plan for potential unforeseen costs. While aiming for the lowest price, ensure there's a buffer or a clear understanding of what scope might be reduced if actual costs exceed projections, without compromising the core deliverable.

Mitigates financial risk and ensures project viability.
Professionalism in Presentation
MediumLow effort

Even with a focus on cost, ensure the bid document is professionally written, well-structured, and free of errors. This conveys reliability and competence, which can be a subtle differentiator in a price-driven tender.

Builds confidence in the bidder's capabilities.
Competitive Positioning
Position your bid as the most cost-effective solution that meets all essential requirements. Emphasize efficiency and a streamlined approach to delivering the required traffic data and model updates. Highlight your ability to provide high-quality input for the noise map at an unparalleled price point.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders must confirm that they agree to all the terms of the tender documents and submit their bid according to the specified structure.
--The bid must be submitted electronically.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-07 07:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must confirm that they agree to all the terms of the tender documents and submit their bid according to the specified structure.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The Hankepass is the entrepreneur's own confirmation, which is initial proof of compliance with the conditions and qualification requirements set by the contracting authority, but it is not filled out directly, but electronically.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--None specified in the provided text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on the cost of the work, where the lowest price will receive the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
308031_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 2.9 KB

Bidders must confirm their acceptance of all tender document conditions and submit their bid according to the provided structure.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308031_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority primarily evaluates bids based on the cost of the work, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
308031_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 36.9 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator serving as preliminary evidence of compliance with the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements, but it is filled out electronically, not directly.

Hanke alusdokumentPDF
Liiklusuuring alusdokument.pdf -- 192.9 KB

Tartu City Government invites bids for conducting the Tartu Traffic Study 2026, with the terms of the service contract detailed in the tender documents.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a traffic study in Tartu is generally well-structured with clear objectives and financial information. However, it lacks specific details on technical capabilities and sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, with a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are noted. The financing condition is clearly stated.

Clarity80/100

The description of the tender's objective is clear, outlining the need for traffic data analysis and model updates for strategic noise mapping. Requirements for bid submission are documented, and evaluation criteria are mentioned.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, specific technical capability requirements are not detailed in the provided text, and the financing condition, while present, could be more explicit regarding the payment schedule beyond '7 working days'.

Technical capability requirements not specified.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. Criteria are objective, focusing on cost with the lowest price receiving maximum score. E-procurement is utilized. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a document URL is implied through the tender documents. The contract start date is specified. Financing is from the Tartu city budget, with no advance payment. The duration is defined as 'PERIOD'.

Specific document URLs are not directly provided in the extracted text, requiring navigation through the e-procurement platform.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded.

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).

Strengths

Clear objective and description of the traffic study.
Well-defined financial information and payment terms.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).

Concerns

Absence of specified technical capability requirements.
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations.
Limited detail on the structure of the bid beyond general confirmation.

Recommendations

1. Specify minimum technical capabilities or experience required for bidders.
2. Incorporate sustainability criteria into the evaluation or requirements.
3. Provide more detailed guidance on the expected bid structure.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline