Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Groundwater resource reassessment and study

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
308015
Value
€80,645
Location
Estonia
Published
March 25, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of groundwater resource reassessment and study100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€80,645
Duration
14 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to reassess groundwater resources and, if necessary, identify possibilities for their increase in deeper water layers, particularly in the Ordovician-Cambrian and Cambrian-Vendian groundwater systems. The study is necessary for accurately assessing the growing water demand of municipalities and ensuring sustainable water supply in developing regions. The procurement will be carried out as a joint procurement in cooperation with several municipalities, as they are affected by similar hydrogeological conditions and the water needs arising from development activities are comparable.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender focuses on a critical groundwater resource reassessment for multiple municipalities. Given the sole reliance on price for evaluation, a winning strategy must prioritize cost-efficiency while demonstrating deep technical expertise and a clear understanding of the hydrogeological complexities across the specified regions. Leveraging existing data and proposing an efficient, unified methodology will be key.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-effective, unified hydrogeological expertise for sustainable water resource management.

Precise reassessment of groundwater resources to meet growing municipal demand.

Key Opportunities
Consolidating services for multiple municipalities under a single contract offers economies of scale.
The limited number of specialists in the market suggests a potential for less intense competition if a bidder can demonstrate strong capacity.
The focus on deeper water layers (Ordovician-Cambrian and Cambrian-Vendian) presents an opportunity to showcase specialized knowledge.
Key Challenges
Sole reliance on the lowest price for evaluation means extreme price pressure.

Develop a highly efficient project plan that minimizes overhead and maximizes resource utilization. Clearly articulate the cost-saving benefits of your proposed methodology. Consider lean project management techniques.

The tender is for a single, indivisible unit, requiring a bidder to have the full capacity to deliver across all specified municipalities.

Ensure robust project management and resource allocation plans are in place to cover all five municipalities (Kuusalu, Kiili, Saku, Rae, and Jõelähtme). If a joint bid, ensure clear roles and responsibilities and joint and several liability.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A specialized hydrogeological consultancy with a proven track record in groundwater resource assessment, particularly within the Ordovician-Cambrian and Cambrian-Vendian systems. The ideal bidder will possess a strong understanding of Estonian hydrogeology, have the capacity to manage a multi-municipal project efficiently, and be able to offer a highly competitive price without compromising on the quality of the scientific output.
Key Requirements
Valid water research attestation
Unified methodology and coordinated work for groundwater resource reassessment
Analysis of existing data and creation of new assessments
Adherence to specified submission format
Addressing business secrets
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience in the specific geological formations (Ordovician-Cambrian, Cambrian-Vendian) relevant to the tender.
A highly efficient and cost-optimized methodology for groundwater reassessment that leverages existing data effectively.
A clear and concise project plan that highlights cost savings and timely delivery for all participating municipalities.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a brief statement on commitment to sustainable water resource management and its long-term benefits for the communities, framing it as a responsible approach to the project.
Bid Focus Areas
Price100%

Submit the lowest possible competitive price that still allows for profitable execution. Conduct thorough cost analysis and identify all potential efficiencies. Benchmark against similar projects if possible.

Recommendations6
Aggressively Price for Lowest Bid
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% price-based evaluation, the primary focus must be on submitting the absolute lowest competitive price. Conduct a detailed cost breakdown to identify all areas for efficiency and cost reduction without compromising essential quality.

Directly maximizes score for the evaluation criterion.
Secure and Present Valid Water Research Attestation
CriticalLow effort

Ensure the bidder possesses a current and valid water research attestation as per Estonian regulations. This is a mandatory requirement and failure to provide it will lead to disqualification.

Ensures eligibility and avoids immediate disqualification.
Highlight Unified Methodology and Efficiency
HighMed effort

Emphasize how your proposed methodology will ensure a unified, coordinated, and cost-effective approach across all five municipalities. Showcase how this integration leads to a more usable and consistent end result.

Addresses a key technical requirement and demonstrates added value beyond just price.
Thoroughly Analyze Existing Data
HighMed effort

Demonstrate a clear plan for analyzing existing data from all municipalities to form the basis of new assessments. This shows efficiency and a data-driven approach, potentially reducing the need for extensive new fieldwork.

Reduces project costs and time, contributing to a lower bid price and demonstrating technical competence.
Prepare for Joint Bidding Requirements
MediumMed effort

If considering a joint bid, ensure all necessary documentation, including powers of attorney and confirmation of joint and several liability, is meticulously prepared and compliant with the tender requirements.

Ensures eligibility and smooth processing of the bid if a consortium approach is chosen.
Address Business Secrets Clearly
MediumLow effort

Ensure the submission clearly outlines how business secrets will be handled, as required by the tender. This demonstrates compliance and professionalism.

Avoids potential issues related to confidentiality and compliance.
Competitive Positioning
Position your bid as the most cost-efficient solution for a comprehensive and unified groundwater reassessment, leveraging specialized expertise in the target geological systems. Highlight the integrated approach that benefits all participating municipalities.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

24 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (9)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (6)
Technical (6)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--The tender is organized as a single, indivisible unit.
--Bidders must confirm adherence to tender conditions.
--Bidders must submit a valid water research attestation.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific exclusion grounds mentioned, but general adherence to tender law is implied.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Must confirm adherence to tender conditions.
--Must provide a valid water research attestation.
--Must follow the specified submission format.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--The tender is organized as a single unit due to the need for a unified methodology and coordinated work for groundwater resource reassessment.
--Market has a limited number of specialists, so division into parts would not increase competition.
--Joint procurement ensures cost-effectiveness and a unified, usable end result for all participating municipalities.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Tender value: 80645.0 EUR
--Bids will be evaluated solely on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
308015_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.6 KB

Bidders must confirm compliance with tender conditions, provide valid water research certifications, adhere to submission formats, and address business secrets and joint bidder authorizations.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308015_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 5.1 KB

The tender evaluation will be based solely on cost, with the lowest bidder receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
308015_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.7 KB

The procurement pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, required for tender participation, but it is not filled out directly on this PDF document.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 28.6 KB

The draft contract outlines the terms and legal framework for the groundwater resources reassessment and study project between the contractor and multiple contracting authorities.

Kiili valla põhjaveevarude ümberhindamise läheülesannePDF
Kiili valla põhjaveevarude ümberhindamise läh... -- 186.7 KB

The tender document outlines the terms of reference for the reassessment and study of groundwater resources in Kiili municipality, aiming to ensure sufficient water supply for the municipality's development.

Kuusalu valla põhjaveevarude ümberhindamise lähteülesannePDF
Lähteülesanne Kuusalu vald.pdf -- 147.0 KB

The contracting authority seeks a service provider to re-evaluate groundwater resources in Kuusalu municipality and prepare a study report, involving analysis of existing data and creation of new assessments.

Saku valla põhjaveevarude ümberhindamise lähteülesannePDF
Saku valla põhjaveevarude ümberhindamise läht... -- 390.9 KB

The contracting authority seeks services for reassessment and study report preparation of Saku municipality's groundwater resources, focusing on existing and prospective boreholes and water resource deficits.

Volikiri dokumentide allkirjastamiseksDOC
Volikiri dokumentide allkirjastamiseks.docx -- 14.6 KB

This document is a power of attorney authorizing the representative to act on behalf of the bidder, sign the tender submission, and related qualification documents.

Volikiri ühispakkujate esindamiseksDOC
Volikiri ühispakkujate esindamiseks.docx -- 16.4 KB

This power of attorney is required for representing joint bidders in the procurement procedure and confirms their joint and several liability for contract performance.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for groundwater resource reassessment is well-structured with clear objectives and a reasonable timeline. The joint procurement approach is justified, and the evaluation criteria are straightforward. However, there is limited information on sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations. The CPV code is appropriate, and the procedure is clearly defined. Deadlines are reasonable, and there are no immediate red flags regarding disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The financing condition is clearly stated.

Clarity80/100

The description of the tender's objective is clear, outlining the need for reassessment and potential expansion of groundwater resources. Requirements are documented, and the evaluation criteria (cost-based) are specified. Conditions for participation and contract performance are generally clear.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like the draft contract and qualification requirements are attached. However, the specific technical requirements for each municipality are not fully detailed in a single accessible document, and some documents are in formats not directly analyzable by AI.

Some municipality-specific technical requirements are not fully detailed in an easily accessible format.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting transparency. The value is disclosed, and the evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective. The joint procurement approach is explained and justified, suggesting it aims to increase efficiency rather than restrict competition. Access to documents is generally good, though some are in less accessible formats.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, which is practical. The contract start date is implied by the submission deadline and contract duration. Financing conditions are specified. However, the duration of the contract (14 months) and the reporting deadlines within it are detailed, but the overall practicality for bidders might be slightly impacted by the complexity of the joint procurement and the need to coordinate with multiple municipalities.

The complexity of coordinating with multiple municipalities in a joint procurement might present practical challenges for bidders.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While the objective of ensuring sustainable water supply is mentioned, it is not translated into specific sustainability criteria for the tender evaluation or contract execution. The tender is not explicitly stated as EU funded.

Lack of explicit green procurement or social criteria.

Strengths

Clear objective and justification for joint procurement.
Well-defined evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Logical and reasonable timeline.

Concerns

Limited explicit sustainability considerations.
Some technical details for individual municipalities could be more consolidated.
Potential complexity for bidders in a multi-municipality joint procurement.

Recommendations

1. Consider incorporating specific sustainability criteria into future tenders.
2. Ensure all municipality-specific technical requirements are easily accessible and consolidated for clarity.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline