Skip to main content
Tenders

Grading of roads in Häädemeeste municipality in 2026

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307981
Value
€20,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 23, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost per hour for one grading work70%
Cost per hour for emergency road repair work30%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Tender Opening

April 02, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€20,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the procurement is the construction, repair, and maintenance works of the road infrastructure belonging to the Häädemeeste Municipal Government.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (9)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-02 07:00:00.
--The bid will be evaluated based on the cost per hour for grading and the cost per hour for emergency road repairs.
--The lowest price for each criterion will receive the maximum score.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated, but general exclusion grounds for public procurement may apply.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must be a legal entity capable of entering into contracts.
--Must not be subject to international sanctions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Must be able to perform road grading and profiling services according to technical specifications.
--Must adhere to quality, schedule, and safety requirements.
--Must be able to perform emergency road repairs.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly stated beyond the contract value.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307981_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 3.7 KB

Bidders must confirm that they will not engage a subcontractor subject to replacement and that the offered goods are not subject to international sanctions.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307981_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.1 KB

The tender will evaluate bids based on two criteria: the cost per hour for planing and the cost per hour for emergency road repair, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307981_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 42.9 KB

The Procurement Pass (Hankepass) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected format of bidder responses.

Teede nimekiri ja kirjeldusXLS
Greiderdatavad teed 2026.xlsx -- 13.7 KB

This document lists the roads in Häädemeeste municipality and their lengths, which are necessary for fulfilling the road grading tender.

Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Tehniline kirjeldus - teede hööveldamine.pdf -- 107.1 KB

Bidders for the road grading and profiling services in Häädemeeste municipality must adhere to technical specifications, including work quality, schedule, and safety requirements.

TöövõtulepingPDF
Töövõtuleping - hööveldamine.pdf -- 148.2 KB

This draft contract outlines the terms, rights, and obligations for both the contracting authority and the contractor regarding road grading and profiling services.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road grading services in Häädemeeste municipality demonstrates good clarity and data consistency. While generally fair and compliant, it could improve on completeness regarding financial requirements and practicality with more detailed documentation.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to adhere to general public procurement regulations. Deadlines are specified and appear reasonable for the scope. The CPV code is provided, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The procedure type (VO) is identified.

Clarity80/100

The tender's objectives, including road construction, repair, and maintenance, are clearly described. Technical specifications and evaluation criteria (though not explicitly marked as 'Required') are mentioned, contributing to clarity. The reasoning for not dividing the tender into lots is also explained.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, estimated value, and deadlines. However, explicit details on financial requirements beyond the contract value are missing. While documents are attached, the absence of explicit 'Required' flags for key documents like Technical Specification and Evaluation Criteria slightly reduces completeness.

Lack of detailed explicit financial requirements beyond estimated value.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows full access to documents. The estimated value is disclosed, and deadlines appear reasonable. Evaluation criteria are based on relative weighting and lowest price, which are objective. The use of e-procurement and electronic submission promotes fairness.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported. A contract start date is provided. However, the AI cannot analyze XML formats, and the practicality of the provided ESPD format for bidders is noted as a potential issue. Financing information is not explicitly detailed. The duration is specified as 'PERIOD' but lacks a concrete timeframe beyond the start date.

Potential difficulty for bidders due to XML format analysis limitations.
Lack of explicit financing information.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, organization, estimated value, and dates are populated logically. There are no indications of suspensions or disputes. The timeline appears consistent and sequential.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded, which limits its sustainability score. These aspects are not a core requirement but their absence is noted.

No explicit green procurement requirements.
No explicit social responsibility aspects mentioned.

Strengths

Clear description of tender object and rationale for no lots.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Objective evaluation criteria based on price.
Good data consistency and populated key fields.

Concerns

Limited explicit financial requirements.
Potential practicality issues with XML format for ESPD.
Absence of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).

Recommendations

1. Provide more detailed financial requirements or examples within the tender documentation.
2. Clarify the practicality of the ESPD XML format or offer an alternative for bidders.
3. Consider integrating sustainability criteria in future tenders, even if optional.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline