Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Repair of reinforced concrete elements of Muuga Port quays No. 1A and 9/10

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307969
Value
€202,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 25, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid price (excluding VAT)100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Tender Opening

April 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€202,000
Duration
7 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the public procurement is the repair of reinforced concrete elements of Muuga Port quays No. 1A and 9/10. The technical description is provided in Annex 1 of the RHAD.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

60%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for Muuga port quay repair is heavily weighted towards price, making cost-efficiency paramount. Bidders must demonstrate a strong track record in port quay construction and meticulously adhere to all submission requirements. Leveraging experience and a lean operational model will be key to securing this contract.

Key Winning Messages

Most Cost-Effective Solution for Muuga Port Quay Repair

Proven Expertise in Port Quay Rehabilitation

Commitment to Sustainable and Efficient Construction Practices

Key Opportunities
The sole evaluation criterion being price presents a clear path to victory for the lowest bidder.
The short contract duration (7 months) favors bidders with agile project management and readily available resources.
The requirement for environmentally friendly work practices allows for differentiation through specific sustainable methods.
The site visit offers an opportunity to gain critical insights into the scope and condition of the quays, enabling more accurate and competitive pricing.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the 100% price weighting.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, optimize resource allocation, and explore all avenues for cost reduction without compromising quality. Consider lean construction methodologies.

Meeting the strict deadline for bid submission and contract signing.

Establish internal timelines well in advance of the deadline, assign dedicated resources for bid preparation and review, and have a clear process for contract review and signing.

Proving eligibility with a specific port quay construction contract within the last 60 months.

Ensure all relevant past projects are well-documented and readily available. If relying on subcontractors for this requirement, ensure their consent forms are correctly completed and submitted.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A construction company with proven experience in marine infrastructure, specifically port quay construction or repair, within the last 60 months. They should possess a highly efficient project management and execution capability, enabling them to offer a competitive price while ensuring quality and timely delivery. Experience with concrete element repair and a robust understanding of environmental best practices are also beneficial.
Key Requirements
At least one successfully completed port quay construction work contract in the last 60 months.
Confirmation of absence of mandatory exclusion grounds.
Bid price (excluding VAT) as the sole evaluation criterion.
Submission of bid in the format specified in Annex 4 (Bid Price Table).
Confirmation of environmentally friendly work practices.
Site visit attendance (April 6, 2026, at 14:00).
Contract signing within 7 calendar days of receipt.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrating a highly optimized cost structure that allows for a significantly lower bid price while maintaining quality.
Presenting a detailed and credible plan for environmentally friendly work practices that goes beyond basic compliance.
Showcasing a highly efficient and experienced project team capable of delivering the works within the tight timeframe.
Providing a clear and concise technical proposal that aligns with the 'Tehniline kirjeldus' (Technical Specification) and demonstrates a deep understanding of concrete element repair.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'Social Aspects: No' is indicated, a bidder could proactively propose a commitment to local employment or training opportunities during the project execution phase. This could be framed as a voluntary initiative to enhance community engagement and potentially be viewed favorably, even if not a formal evaluation criterion.
Bid Focus Areas
Bid price (excluding VAT)100.0%

Develop a highly competitive and accurate cost model. Focus on operational efficiency, material sourcing, and labor optimization to achieve the lowest possible price. Conduct detailed cost breakdowns to justify the bid and ensure profitability.

Recommendations7
Aggressively Price for the Lowest Bid
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% weighting on bid price, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible viable price. Conduct a thorough cost analysis, optimize resource allocation, and explore all avenues for cost reduction without compromising quality or safety.

Directly impacts the score and likelihood of winning.
Meticulously Document Port Quay Experience
CriticalMed effort

Ensure Annex 3 is completed accurately and comprehensively, providing clear evidence of at least one successfully completed port quay construction or repair contract within the last 60 months. This is a non-negotiable eligibility requirement.

Ensures eligibility and avoids disqualification.
Attend the Site Visit
HighMed effort

Mandatory attendance at the site visit on April 6, 2026, at 14:00 is crucial for understanding the scope of work, site conditions, and potential challenges. This knowledge is vital for accurate pricing and technical planning.

Enables more accurate bidding and identification of potential risks.
Thoroughly Review and Adhere to Submission Format
HighMed effort

Strictly follow the format specified in Annex 4 (Bid Price Table) and all other submission requirements outlined in the RHAD. Errors in formatting or missing documents can lead to disqualification.

Prevents disqualification due to administrative errors.
Highlight Environmentally Friendly Practices
MediumLow effort

While not a primary evaluation criterion, detailing specific, verifiable environmentally friendly work practices can serve as a positive differentiator and demonstrate commitment beyond the minimum requirement.

Enhances bidder's image and may influence subjective aspects if any emerge.
Confirm Absence of Exclusion Grounds
HighMed effort

Ensure all mandatory exclusion grounds as per RHS § 95 are thoroughly checked and confirmed to be absent. This requires a diligent internal review of the company's history and compliance.

Prevents disqualification based on legal or ethical grounds.
Prepare for Swift Contract Signing
HighLow effort

Have a streamlined internal process for contract review and signing to ensure the 7-day deadline is met. Delays can lead to contract award withdrawal and penalties.

Ensures successful award and avoids penalties.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most economically advantageous offer, emphasizing cost-efficiency and value for money. Highlight a lean operational model and streamlined processes that enable competitive pricing. Showcase a proven track record of delivering similar projects on time and within budget, reinforcing reliability and expertise.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (7)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The final completion date for the works is no later than six (6) months from the signing of the procurement contract, with an additional up to 1 month for the fulfillment of mutual obligations.
--Site visit will take place on April 6, 2026, at 14:00. Further information is in the RHAD document "Proposal for Submission of Bid" section 2.2.
--The bidder whose bid is declared successful must sign and return the procurement contract to the contracting authority no later than 7 (seven) calendar days from the receipt of the prepared procurement contract. The contracting authority may extend the signing deadline for a valid reason, notifying the successful bidder in a form reproducible in writing. Refusal to sign the contract within the given deadline or failure to commence contract performance gives the contracting authority the right to apply the provisions of RHS § 119.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must prove they do not have exclusion grounds as per RHS § 95.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Bidders must have at least one successfully completed port quay construction work contract in the last 60 months.
--Bidders must confirm compliance with tender conditions.
--Bidders must confirm correct bid formatting.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must have at least one successfully completed port quay construction work contract in the last 60 months.
--Bidders must provide details of completed contracts on Form Annex 3 to prove the existence of at least one properly completed port quay construction or repair contract in the last 60 months.
--The contracting authority will check the background of subcontractors regarding convictions for corruption and terrorism, requiring relevant explanations and proof of reliability.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid price will be evaluated, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307969_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 39.2 KB

The contracting authority verifies subcontractors' backgrounds regarding convictions for corruption and terrorism, requiring relevant explanations and proof of reliability.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307969_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.8 KB

This compliance conditions document requires bidders to confirm adherence to tender terms, correct bid submission, absence of sanctions, and environmentally friendly work practices.

Pakkuja esitab täidetud lepingu andmed Lisa 3 vormil.DOC
Lisa 3 Täidetud lepingu andmed viitenr 307969... -- 46.1 KB

Bidders must submit completed contract data on Form Annex 3, proving the existence of at least one properly fulfilled port quay construction or repair contract within the last 60 months.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307969_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The tender evaluates the bid price, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
307969_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 12.6 KB

Bidders must confirm the absence of exclusion grounds as per RHS § 95 and demonstrate at least one properly fulfilled contract for port quay construction works within the last 60 months.

Lisa 5 Teise isiku (alltöövõtja) nõusolek kvalifitseerimise tingimustele tuginem...DOC
Lisa 5 Teise isiku (alltöövõtja) nõusoleku vo... -- 24.3 KB

This document is a subcontractor's consent, confirming that the bidder may rely on the subcontractor's qualifications to meet eligibility requirements.

Lisa 6 Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Lisa 6 Ühispakkujate_volikiri viitenr 307969.... -- 16.3 KB

This document is a power of attorney, authorizing one bidder to submit a tender on behalf of another bidder in the given procurement.

RHAD Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekPDF
RHAD (lihthange) MS kaid 1A, 9_10_viitenr 307... -- 296.7 KB

This document outlines the proposal for submitting bids for the repair of Muuga port piers, specifying deadlines, participation conditions, and referencing further base documents.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Muuga port pier repair is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable process. Key areas for improvement include the accessibility of all tender documents and a more explicit focus on sustainability beyond 'Green Procurement'.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the tender's scope. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements are generally well-documented. Evaluation criteria are specified as 'relative_weighting', which is a standard approach. Conditions are outlined in the contract project.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, value, and duration. However, the AI could not analyze all attached documents (e.g., .zip, .xls), potentially impacting the completeness of the review. The contract start date is not explicitly stated.

Some critical tender documents (e.g., Technical Specification, Contract Project, Bid Price Table) are in formats not supported by AI analysis, potentially hindering full understanding of completeness.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The value is disclosed, and criteria are objective. Deadlines are reasonable. Access to all documents is crucial for fairness, and the inability to analyze some formats is a concern.

While not explicitly tailored to specific companies, the reliance on specific Annex forms (Annex 3, 4, 5, 6) requires careful attention from bidders to ensure full compliance.
Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are positive. The contract duration is specified. However, the contract start date is not explicitly stated, and financing conditions are only referenced in the contract project, which was not fully analyzed.

Contract start date is not explicitly mentioned.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, and value are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent within the provided information.

Sustainability50/100

The tender includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic. However, there is no explicit mention of social aspects or innovation, and it is not indicated as EU funded. This limits the overall sustainability score.

Lack of explicit social criteria or innovation focus.

Strengths

Clear description of works and location.
Use of e-procurement and e-submission.
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed value.
Specific CPV code provided.

Concerns

Inability to fully analyze all attached tender documents due to file format limitations.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Limited explicit sustainability criteria beyond 'Green Procurement'.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all tender documents are provided in universally accessible formats for future tenders.
2. Explicitly state the contract start date or a clear mechanism for its determination.
3. Consider incorporating specific social and innovation criteria to enhance sustainability.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline