Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Obstetrics and gynecology supplies

Open
Deadline
20 days left
April 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307961
Value
€279,508
Location
Estonia
Published
March 23, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of the lot100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 24, 2026

Tender Opening

April 24, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€279,508
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€92,792
Avg. Bids
2.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
3,220 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to conclude a framework agreement for the purchase of obstetrics and gynecology supplies. Product descriptions are provided in Annex 1. The subject of the procurement also includes the provision of training on the use of each offered product upon request by the contracting authority. The training must be conducted for the employees of the contracting authority's women's clinic within two weeks of the contracting authority's request. The bidder must ensure the training covers the extent necessary for the safe and proper use of the offered products. The training must be conducted in Estonian and take place at the Tartu University Hospital Foundation, L. Puusepa 8, Tartu. The procurement is divided into 19 lots. Bids may be submitted for one or more lots. Framework agreements will be concluded under the conditions of Annex 2 for a period until 31.05.2029. In the event that the same bidder is successful in multiple lots, a single framework agreement will be concluded with them, encompassing all relevant procurement lots.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for obstetrics and gynecology supplies is heavily weighted towards cost. A winning strategy will focus on aggressive pricing, meticulous adherence to technical specifications, and demonstrating robust training capabilities. Leveraging economies of scale and efficient supply chain management will be crucial for cost optimization.

Key Winning Messages

Cost Leadership: Delivering the most competitive pricing for essential medical supplies.

Reliable Supply & Expertise: Ensuring consistent availability of high-quality products with guaranteed, effective training.

Partnership for Patient Care: Committing to supporting Tartu University Hospital's mission through efficient and compliant procurement.

Key Opportunities
Potential for a single framework agreement covering multiple lots if the same bidder is successful in several parts.
The tender is divided into 19 parts, allowing bidders to specialize and focus on specific product categories where they have a competitive advantage.
The estimated value of 279,508.0 EUR suggests a significant, ongoing demand for these supplies.
Key Challenges
The evaluation criterion is 100% based on total cost, creating intense price competition.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all cost drivers. Explore economies of scale, optimize logistics, and consider strategic partnerships for raw material sourcing to achieve the lowest possible price without compromising quality or compliance.

The requirement for training to be conducted in Estonian within two weeks of request requires immediate logistical and personnel readiness.

Develop a pre-approved pool of Estonian-speaking trainers and ensure they are readily available. Establish a clear internal process for receiving and responding to training requests within the stipulated timeframe.

The tender does not explicitly mention Green or Social Procurement, but future tenders might, indicating a potential shift in priorities.

While not a current requirement, consider incorporating sustainable practices into operations and supply chain management. This can provide a competitive edge in future tenders and align with evolving institutional values.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established medical supply distributor with a strong existing presence in Estonia, capable of offering competitive pricing due to bulk purchasing power. They must possess a proven track record in supplying similar medical consumables and have the logistical infrastructure to ensure timely delivery and effective on-site training in Estonian.
Key Requirements
Supply of childbirth and gynecology supplies as detailed in Lisa 1
Conducting product training in Estonian at Tartu University Hospital within two weeks of request
Submission of cost information using Lisa 4 - maksumuse vorm.xls
Compliance with framework agreement terms (Lisa 2 - Raamleping.pdf)
Adherence to procedural rules and submission requirements (Juhised pakkujale.pdf)
Completion and submission of ESPD (v2.0 extended) in XML format
Key Discriminators
Demonstrating superior cost-efficiency through optimized supply chain and bulk purchasing.
Providing a highly responsive and effective training program delivered by native Estonian speakers.
Offering a comprehensive product portfolio that covers a significant number of the 19 lots, potentially leading to a consolidated framework agreement.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, a bidder could voluntarily commit to sourcing a percentage of supplies from local Estonian manufacturers or suppliers where feasible, contributing to the local economy. This could be framed as a commitment to supporting the Estonian healthcare ecosystem.
Bid Focus Areas
Total cost of the lot100.0%

Aggressively price each lot to be the lowest. Conduct detailed cost-benefit analysis for each product to identify areas for margin optimization without sacrificing quality. Leverage bulk purchasing and efficient logistics to drive down unit costs. Consider offering tiered pricing for higher volumes if applicable within the framework.

Recommendations5
Aggressive Costing Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Develop a highly competitive pricing model for each of the 19 lots. This requires a deep understanding of cost structures, supplier negotiations, and efficient logistics. Aim to be the lowest bidder on as many lots as possible.

Directly impacts the primary evaluation criterion, maximizing the chances of winning.
Robust Training Plan and Resources
CriticalMed effort

Prepare a detailed plan for delivering product training in Estonian within the two-week window. Ensure sufficient qualified trainers are available and have a clear process for receiving and executing training requests promptly.

Meets a critical technical requirement and demonstrates operational readiness.
Thorough Document Review and Compliance Check
HighMed effort

Meticulously review all provided documents (Lisa 1, Lisa 2, Juhised pakkujale, Hankepass, etc.) to ensure full compliance with all technical, procedural, and legal requirements. Pay close attention to the framework agreement terms.

Prevents disqualification and ensures a compliant bid.
Proactive Communication and Clarification
MediumLow effort

If any ambiguities exist in the tender documents, proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority. This demonstrates engagement and a commitment to understanding the requirements fully.

Can lead to a more accurate and competitive bid, and potentially uncover nuances missed by competitors.
ESPD and Hankepass Preparation
HighMed effort

Ensure the ESPD (v2.0 extended) is correctly completed in XML format and the Hankepass is accurately filled out. These are foundational eligibility requirements.

Essential for bid admissibility.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective supplier without compromising on product quality or training delivery. Emphasize efficiency and reliability in supply chain management to justify competitive pricing. Highlight the ability to consolidate multiple lots under one framework agreement as a benefit for the contracting authority.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

21 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (8)
Technical (4)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must follow the procedural rules and submission requirements detailed in "Juhised pakkujale.pdf".
--Bidders must adhere to the format and conditions set by the contracting authority as described in "hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf".
--Bidders must submit their bids by the deadline: 2026-04-24 08:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tender does not explicitly detail mandatory exclusion grounds, but they are typically covered by national procurement laws and the ESPD.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Bidders must be legally registered entities.
--Bidders must not be subject to exclusion grounds as per national procurement legislation.
--Bidders must confirm their eligibility through the provided Hankepass (initial self-declaration).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must be able to supply childbirth and gynecology supplies as detailed in "Lisa 1 - tehniline kirjeldus.docx".
--Specific items include, but are not limited to, PSA rapid test, metal syringe rack, and Bartholin catheter set.
--The technical specifications and quantities for an estimated three-year period are provided.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The total value of the tender is 279508.0 EUR.
--Bidders must submit their cost information using the provided form (Lisa 4 - maksumuse vorm.xls), though AI analysis is not supported for this format.
--The primary evaluation criterion is the total cost.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307961_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 234.1 KB

This document outlines requirements for joint bidder authorization, trade secrets, and equivalency, which are necessary for tender submission.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 - tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 43.1 KB

The contracting authority, Tartu University Hospital Foundation, is seeking obstetric and gynecological supplies, including a PSA rapid test, a metal syringe frame, and a Bartholin catheter set, providing detailed technical specifications and estimated quantities for a three-year period.

AvaldusDOC
Lisa 3 vorm III.docx -- 33.1 KB

The application is a form by which the bidder confirms their desire to participate in the tender procedure and their agreement with the tender conditions.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307961_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 25.2 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria and scoring methodology for assessing bids on various obstetric and gynecological supply lots, with the primary criterion being the total cost.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307961_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.2 KB

The procurement pass is an initial self-declaration by the company, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not intended for completion itself.

Juhised pakkujalePDF
Juhised pakkujale.pdf -- 219.3 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders participating in the public procurement of obstetrics and gynecology supplies, clarifying procedural rules and submission requirements.

RaamlepingPDF
Lisa 2 - Raamleping.pdf -- 188.8 KB

This is a framework agreement for the purchase of obstetrics and gynecology supplies by Tartu University Hospital, outlining contract terms, product lists, and seller requirements.

Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Lisa 3 vorm I.docx -- 32.9 KB

This document is a joint bidder's power of attorney, authorizing one joint bidder to represent others in submitting the bid and concluding the contract.

VolikiriDOC
Lisa 3 vorm II.docx -- 28.5 KB

A power of attorney document authorizing an individual to officially represent the bidding company and sign the tender submission.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for obstetrics and gynecology supplies is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable process. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance standards with a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission period. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the tender's objective and scope is clear, detailing the need for supplies and associated training. Requirements are documented in various attached files, and the conditions for participation are outlined. The primary evaluation criterion (cost) is mentioned, though a detailed methodology is missing.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, duration of the framework agreement (until 31.05.2029), and a clear submission deadline. However, the contract start date is not explicitly specified, and the absence of explicit evaluation criteria impacts completeness.

Missing contract start date
Evaluation criteria not explicitly detailed
Fairness85/100

The tender offers full document access and discloses the estimated value. Deadlines are reasonable, and the process is e-procurement-based. The criteria are objective (primarily cost), and there are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting a fair competition.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, and document URLs are provided through the e-procurement portal. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and while the framework agreement duration is specified, the exact contract start date is missing, impacting overall practicality.

Financing information not explicitly detailed
Contract start date missing
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This lack of focus on sustainability aspects results in a moderate score.

No explicit mention of green procurement
No explicit mention of social aspects

Strengths

Clear description of tender objective and scope
Comprehensive set of required documents provided
E-procurement and e-submission facilitated
Reasonable submission deadline

Concerns

Absence of explicit evaluation criteria and scoring methodology
Missing contract start date
Lack of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation)

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria and scoring methodology.
2. Specify the contract start date to enhance clarity and planning for bidders.
3. Incorporate sustainability criteria to align with modern procurement practices.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline