Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Repair and waterproofing of Muuga Port quay no. 5 with ramp and quay no. 33 concrete head

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307937
Value
€367,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 25, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid price (excluding VAT)100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€367,000
Duration
7 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the public procurement is the repair and waterproofing of the concrete head of quay no. 5 with a ramp and quay no. 33 in Muuga Port. The technical specification is provided in Annex 1 of RHAD.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for Muuga Port quay repair is heavily price-driven (100% evaluation). A winning strategy will focus on delivering a highly competitive price while rigorously meeting all technical and eligibility requirements. Demonstrating a strong track record in similar port infrastructure projects and efficient project management will be crucial for differentiation.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-Effective and Compliant Quay Repair

Proven Expertise in Port Infrastructure Projects

Efficient Project Delivery within Tight Deadlines

Key Opportunities
Leverage economies of scale and efficient supply chains to offer a highly competitive price.
Highlight specific experience with concrete repair and waterproofing on port structures to meet technical requirements.
Demonstrate a clear understanding of the site visit and its importance for accurate cost estimation and technical planning.
Utilize the option to rely on subcontractor qualifications, provided consent forms are submitted, to bolster technical capabilities if needed.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% weightage on bid price.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, optimize resource allocation, and explore all avenues for cost reduction without compromising quality or safety. Consider lean construction principles.

Strict deadline for contract signing (7 days) and project completion (6 months + 1 month).

Develop a detailed project execution plan with clear milestones and resource allocation. Ensure internal capacity and subcontractor availability are confirmed prior to submission. Have contract review and signing personnel on standby.

Ensuring all mandatory exclusion grounds are addressed and eligibility criteria are met.

Conduct a thorough review of all exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements. Prepare all necessary documentation in advance, including subcontractor consent forms and Form Annex 3.

Meeting 'environmentally friendly requirements' without explicit details in the provided AI summary.

Thoroughly review 'Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus' for specific environmental mandates. Proactively incorporate sustainable practices in the bid, such as waste management, material selection, and emissions reduction, even if not explicitly detailed in the summary.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A construction company with proven experience in marine infrastructure, specifically port quay construction and repair. They must possess strong cost control capabilities, efficient project execution methodologies, and a robust understanding of environmental compliance in port operations. Experience with concrete repair and waterproofing is essential.
Key Requirements
Proof of at least one completed port quay construction or repair contract within the last 60 months (Form Annex 3)
Adherence to environmentally friendly requirements
Submission of bid price according to the provided form
Signing and returning the contract within 7 calendar days
Confirmation that bid meets conditions in tender documents (Technical Capability)
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated ability to deliver similar port quay repair projects on time and within budget, supported by strong references.
Innovative approaches to concrete repair and waterproofing that offer long-term durability and reduced maintenance.
A highly efficient and experienced project management team with a proven track record in marine construction.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to employing local labor where feasible, contributing to the local economy and community development. Specify the percentage of local employment targeted.
Bid Focus Areas
Bid price (excluding VAT)100.0%

Achieve the lowest possible price by optimizing all cost components. Conduct detailed cost engineering, secure competitive material and labor rates, and ensure efficient site logistics. Benchmark against market rates for similar projects.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly Document Past Performance
CriticalMed effort

Ensure Form Annex 3 is completed accurately and comprehensively, providing clear evidence of at least one successfully completed port quay construction or repair contract within the last 60 months. Include project details, client testimonials, and contract values to strengthen the submission.

Ensures eligibility and demonstrates capability, directly addressing a mandatory requirement.
Aggressively Price for 100% Score
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct in-depth cost analysis to identify opportunities for price reduction. This includes optimizing material sourcing, labor deployment, equipment utilization, and overhead allocation. Consider the full project lifecycle and potential for cost efficiencies.

Maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Attend Site Visit and Conduct Detailed Technical Review
CriticalMed effort

Mandatory attendance at the site visit on April 1, 2026, is crucial. Use this opportunity to thoroughly assess the condition of Kai nr 5 and Kai nr 33, understand site constraints, and gather all necessary information to inform a precise and cost-effective technical solution. Review 'Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus' in detail.

Reduces risk of unforeseen costs, improves accuracy of bid, and demonstrates commitment.
Prepare for Rapid Contract Signing
HighMed effort

Have a dedicated team ready to review and sign the contract within 7 calendar days of receipt. Ensure legal and procurement departments are briefed and available. Pre-emptively identify any potential points of contention in the draft contract ('Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt') and prepare for swift resolution.

Avoids disqualification due to failure to meet contractual obligations.
Highlight Environmental Compliance and Best Practices
MediumMed effort

Even though 'Green Procurement' is marked 'Yes' and 'Innovative Aspects' is 'No', proactively detail how your bid will meet or exceed 'environmentally friendly requirements'. This could include waste reduction plans, use of sustainable materials, or emissions control measures during construction.

Demonstrates responsible bidding and may appeal to the contracting authority's broader sustainability goals.
Subcontractor Due Diligence and Consent
MediumMed effort

If relying on subcontractors, ensure their consent forms are submitted and that they meet the contracting authority's background check requirements for corruption and terrorism. Conduct your own due diligence on key subcontractors.

Ensures compliance with submission requirements and avoids disqualification.
Incorporate Local Employment Commitment
LowLow effort

While social aspects are not explicitly weighted, a commitment to local employment can be a positive differentiator. Quantify the expected percentage of local workforce to be engaged.

Enhances bidder's corporate social responsibility image.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective provider of high-quality quay repair services, leveraging efficient operations and supply chain management. Emphasize a proven track record in similar, complex marine construction projects to build trust and confidence in your ability to deliver on price and schedule.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (11)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS11
--The successful bidder must sign and return the contract to the contracting authority no later than 7 calendar days from receipt of the prepared contract.
--The contracting authority may extend the signing deadline for a valid reason.
--Failure to sign the contract or commence performance within the given deadline may result in the application of provisions from Section 119 of the Public Procurement Act.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must prove they do not have grounds for exclusion.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must have at least one properly completed port quay construction or repair contract within the last 60 months.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must confirm their bid meets the conditions set out in the tender documents.
--Bidders must follow environmentally friendly requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid price must be submitted according to the provided form.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307937_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 39.2 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds for corruption and terrorism, requiring relevant explanations for first-round subcontractors.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307937_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.8 KB

Bidders must confirm that their bid meets the conditions set out in the tender documents, including submitting the bid price according to the provided form and adhering to environmentally friendly requirements.

Pakkuja esitab täidetud lepingu andmed Lisa 3 vormil.DOC
Lisa 3 Täidetud lepingu andmed viitenr 307937... -- 45.9 KB

Bidders must submit completed contract data on Form Annex 3, proving the existence of at least one properly fulfilled port quay construction or repair contract within the last 60 months.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307937_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The tender evaluates the bid price, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
307937_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 12.6 KB

Bidders must confirm the absence of exclusion grounds and demonstrate at least one properly executed port quay construction or repair contract within the last 60 months.

Lisa 5 Teise isiku (alltöövõtja) nõusolek kvalifitseerimise tingimustele tuginem...DOC
Lisa 5 Teise isiku (alltöövõtja) nõusoleku vo... -- 24.3 KB

This document is a subcontractor's consent confirming that the bidder may rely on the subcontractor's qualifications to prove tender eligibility.

Lisa 6 Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Lisa 6 Ühispakkujate_volikiri viitenr 307937.... -- 16.3 KB

This document is a power of attorney authorizing one bidder to submit a tender on behalf of other joint bidders.

RHAD Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekPDF
RHAD (lihthange) MS kaid 5, 33 viitenr 307937... -- 296.4 KB

This document is a proposal for submitting a bid, containing tender notice details, work descriptions, deadlines, and participation conditions for the Muuga Port quay repair tender.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Muuga Port quay repair is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable process. Key areas for improvement include the explicit mention of financing sources and the integration of more robust sustainability criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including proper CPV codes and a clear process. Deadlines appear reasonable, and no disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is presumed based on the available information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and requirements are documented in various annexes. Evaluation criteria are specified with relative weighting, and conditions for participation are outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, specific financing details beyond referencing the contract project could enhance completeness.

Fairness85/100

The tender offers full document access and discloses the estimated value. Criteria are objective, and e-procurement is utilized. Deadlines are reasonable, and there are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, and document URLs are implicitly available through the tender portal. The contract start date is not explicitly stated but can be inferred from the duration. Financing information is referenced but not detailed. Duration is specified.

Financing information could be more explicit.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes, and the dates provided are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, indicating some consideration for environmental aspects. However, specific social criteria or innovation focus are not explicitly detailed.

Lack of specific social criteria or innovation focus.

Strengths

Clear description of works and technical specifications.
Well-defined eligibility and technical capability requirements.
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Objective evaluation criteria based on relative weighting.

Concerns

Limited explicit detail on financing conditions.
Sustainability aspects could be more comprehensively defined beyond 'Green Procurement'.

Recommendations

1. Provide more explicit details regarding the financing of the contract.
2. Elaborate on specific social and innovation criteria within the sustainability framework.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline