Skip to main content
Tenders

Purchase of rail overlay welding and rail welding service

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
307935
Value
€11,250
Location
Estonia
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of overlay welding service for turnouts100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 19, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€11,250
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€265,238
Avg. Bids
2.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
90%
843 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of overlay welding service for 11 used rails owned by Enefit Industry OÜ. If necessary, the subject of the procurement can be viewed at Must station, address: Must station, Auvere village, Narva-Jõesuu city, 40107 Ida-Viru county. Site inspection must be arranged in advance with the contact person: Sergey Krylov, email: sergey.krylov@enefit.com (tel: +372 506 5287)
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Bidders must confirm that their bid complies with all conditions set out in the tender documents.
--Conditional bids are not allowed.
--Bidders must submit a list of similar works performed in the last 36 months on the form "Contract List", including client, work title, cost, and duration.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must prove they do not fall under exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must have at least one similar rail restoration reference contract within the last 36 months.
--The welder must possess the relevant qualification.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The service aims to restore the operational capacity of turnout crossings and extend their service life according to current standards.
--The service involves overlay welding of turnouts and rail welding.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The tender value is 11250.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307935_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 2.6 KB

Bidders must confirm that their bid meets all conditions set forth in the tender base documents; conditional bids are not allowed.

Pakkuja esitab vormil „Lepingute nimekiri“ hankele eelneva viimase 36 kuu jooksu...DOC
Vorm Lepingute nimekiri.docx -- 26.6 KB

The bidder must submit a list of similar works performed in the last 36 months on the form 'List of Contracts', including client, work title, cost, and duration details.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307935_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids based on the cost of the overlay welding service for crossing rails, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
307935_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 6.9 KB

Bidders must confirm they are not subject to exclusion grounds and have at least one similar rail restoration reference contract in the last 36 months, with qualified welders.

Juhised pakkujatelePDF
Juhised pakkujatele_Vaikehange RHR 16092022.p... -- 465.7 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders on the small tender process, requesting clarifications, and submitting and formatting bids, emphasizing compliance with the base documents' conditions.

Lepingu projektDOC
Lepingu projekt.docx -- 37.3 KB

This document is a draft of the service contract outlining the terms, deadlines, and cost for purchasing the service of overlay welding and rail welding.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 35.5 KB

Enefit Industry OÜ is seeking services for overlay welding and rail welding to restore the functionality and extend the lifespan of switch crossings, adhering to applicable standards.

Tööandjate vastutuse ja kohustuste jaotus töötervishoiu ja tööohutuse tagamiselDOC
Tööandjate vastutuse ja kohustuste jaotus töö... -- 33.6 KB

This document defines the responsibilities and obligations of employers in ensuring occupational health and safety and is an integral part of the tender documents.

Töövõtulepingu üldtingimusedPDF
Töövõtulepingu üldtingimused.pdf -- 222.0 KB

This document outlines the general terms and conditions for works contracts for Eesti Energia AS and its group companies, forming an integral part of the contract and governing work quality, handover, and party obligations.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for rail welding services is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on attached documents for detailed information.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable timeline. No immediate legal disputes or regulatory non-compliance issues are apparent. Deadlines are present and appear reasonable within the context of a small tender.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the requirements are documented within the provided AI-extracted list and referenced documents. The evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting, implying a clear process, though the specific weighting is not detailed here.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration type, and contract start date. However, the financing condition and performance conditions are stated as being in the base document, requiring bidders to access additional files for full understanding. The number of attached documents is high, which can sometimes obscure key information.

Financing condition and performance conditions are referenced in base documents, not explicitly detailed.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. The criteria for evaluation (lowest price) are objective. E-submission and e-procurement are specified, promoting fairness. The requirement for a similar rail restoration reference contract is standard and not tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, which is practical. A document URL is not explicitly provided, but the tender is accessible through a platform. The contract start date is specified. Financing information is linked to the contract project document, requiring an extra step for bidders.

Financing information is only referenced in the contract project document.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening, Contract Start) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender does not indicate if it is EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green procurement, social aspects, innovation).

Strengths

Clear description of services required.
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Reasonable timeline for a small tender.

Concerns

Reliance on multiple attached documents for complete understanding of conditions.
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations.
Financing and performance conditions are only referenced in other documents.

Recommendations

1. Consolidate key financing and performance conditions directly within the main tender document or provide direct links.
2. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria to encourage greener or more socially responsible bids.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline