Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Purchase of fire extinguisher maintenance service for educational buildings in Tartu city

Open
Deadline
3 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
307933
Value
€70,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of fire extinguisher maintenance service100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€70,000
Duration
72 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€265,238
Avg. Bids
2.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
90%
843 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the public procurement is the provision of fire extinguisher inspection and maintenance services at the educational facilities described in the procurement documents.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

75%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for fire extinguisher maintenance services in Tartu's educational buildings is heavily weighted on price. A winning strategy will focus on aggressive cost management and demonstrating operational efficiency to offer the lowest possible bid, while ensuring full compliance with all mandatory and technical requirements.

Key Winning Messages

Unbeatable Value: Delivering compliant and reliable fire extinguisher maintenance at the most competitive price.

Trusted Partner: Ensuring the safety of Tartu's educational institutions with proven expertise and strict adherence to regulations.

Key Opportunities
Aggressive Pricing Strategy
Site Inspection for Accurate Costing
Demonstrate Operational Efficiency
Key Challenges
Intense Price Competition

Conduct thorough cost analysis, optimize operational workflows, and explore economies of scale to present the absolute lowest viable price. Consider lean service delivery models.

Ensuring 100% Compliance with Technical Requirements

Develop a detailed checklist based on the tender's technical requirements and ensure all aspects of the service plan and submission documentation address them comprehensively. Leverage internal expertise or external consultants if needed.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established fire safety service provider with a strong track record in public sector contracts, possessing efficient operational processes, a lean cost structure, and a deep understanding of Estonian fire safety regulations. The bidder should have no ties to the Russian Federation and be capable of delivering the service across multiple educational sites.
Key Requirements
Lowest Bid Price
Compliance with Mandatory Exclusion Grounds (No Russian Federation connections)
Detailed Fire Extinguisher Information (Control/Maintenance Schedules)
Technical Capability (Inspection, Maintenance, Mapping, Placement Proposals)
Subcontractor Data (if applicable)
Key Discriminators
The ability to demonstrate a significantly lower cost base through optimized logistics, efficient technician deployment, or bulk purchasing of consumables, which can be passed on as a lower bid price.
A highly detailed and accurate site survey leading to a precise and cost-effective service plan that minimizes unforeseen costs during contract execution.
Social Value Opportunities
While social value is not a stated requirement, a bidder could voluntarily commit to employing local technicians from Tartu, contributing to local employment and community development. This could be mentioned in the bid as a value-add, though it won't directly impact scoring.
Bid Focus Areas
Cost of fire extinguisher maintenance service100.0%

Achieve the lowest possible bid price by meticulously calculating all direct and indirect costs, optimizing operational efficiency, and potentially accepting a lower profit margin to secure the contract. Leverage any economies of scale or bulk purchasing power.

Recommendations6
Aggressively Price the Bid
CriticalHigh effort

Given that price is the sole evaluation criterion (100%), dedicate significant resources to cost analysis. Conduct a thorough site inspection to accurately estimate all costs associated with inspection, maintenance, mapping, and reporting across all educational buildings. Explore all avenues for cost reduction in labor, materials, and logistics.

Directly maximizes score for the only evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Strictly Adhere to Exclusion Grounds
CriticalMed effort

Thoroughly vet all potential subcontractors and suppliers to ensure absolutely no connections to the Russian Federation. Document this vetting process as part of the submission to demonstrate due diligence.

Ensures eligibility and avoids immediate disqualification.
Provide Comprehensive Technical Details
CriticalMed effort

Submit detailed information on the fire extinguishers to be serviced, including precise control and maintenance schedules as requested. This demonstrates a clear understanding of the scope and capability to meet technical demands.

Meets a critical technical requirement, avoiding disqualification and building confidence in service delivery.
Conduct Thorough Site Inspections
HighMed effort

Utilize the unlimited opportunity to inspect buildings. This is crucial for accurate cost estimation and identifying any unique challenges or requirements that could impact pricing and service delivery. Document findings meticulously.

Enables precise costings for the bid, reduces risk of cost overruns, and allows for a more competitive price.
Document Subcontractor Compliance
HighMed effort

If subcontractors are used, meticulously document their names, registration codes, addresses, services provided, and costs. Crucially, include confirmation of their compliance with the exclusion grounds (no Russian Federation connections).

Ensures compliance with submission requirements and avoids disqualification due to subcontractor issues.
Highlight Operational Efficiency
MediumLow effort

While not directly evaluated, subtly highlight in the bid narrative (where appropriate, e.g., in the technical proposal section if allowed) how your operational model leads to cost efficiencies. This can reinforce the perception of value for money, even if only price is scored.

Subtly reinforces the value proposition and can build confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver at the low price.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective provider without compromising on essential safety and compliance. Emphasize streamlined operations and a lean business model that allows for the lowest possible price, while still meeting all technical specifications.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (8)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Bidders have the opportunity to independently inspect the buildings that are the subject of the public procurement and conduct necessary studies for submitting a bid.
--The number of inspection visits is not limited.
--Buildings can be inspected by prior agreement with the person responsible for the procurement.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders shall not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm they have received all necessary information and have reviewed the conditions.
--Bidders must agree to the bid price and obligations related to contract performance.
--Bidders must confirm they are not engaging subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The service includes inspection, maintenance, mapping of fire extinguishers, and proposals for improving placement according to current legislation.
--Bidders must provide detailed information on the fire extinguishers to be serviced, including their control/maintenance schedules.
--Bidders must provide data on subcontractors used, including their names, registration codes, addresses, services provided, and costs, based on their economic, financial, technical, and professional competence if necessary.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307933_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.6 KB

The bidder must confirm that subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation will not be involved in the contract execution and must provide information regarding trade secrets.

Vorm 1DOC
VORM 1.docx -- 16.0 KB

The bidder confirms receipt of all necessary information, review of terms, and agreement with the bid cost and contractual obligations.

Vorm 2DOC
VORM 2.docx -- 15.0 KB

The bidder must provide information about subcontractors used, including their names, registration codes, addresses, services provided, and costs, relying on their economic, financial, technical, and professional competence as needed.

Vorm 3XLS
VORM 3_Maksumuse tabel.xlsx -- 85.8 KB

The tender seeks offers for the maintenance service of fire extinguishers in Tartu city's educational buildings, providing a detailed list of extinguishers to be serviced and their inspection/maintenance schedules.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307933_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307933_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.9 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's stipulated conditions.

Hankelepingu olulised tingimusedDOC
Hankelepingu olulised tingimused.docx -- 23.0 KB

The essential terms of the procurement contract outline the scope of the fire extinguisher maintenance service for Tartu city's educational buildings, the obligations of the contractor and the contracting authority, and the contract duration.

Hooldusteenuse tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Hooldusteenuse tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 19.1 KB

The contracting authority seeks fire extinguisher maintenance services, including inspection, maintenance, mapping, and suggestions for placement improvements according to current legislation.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for fire extinguisher maintenance services in Tartu's educational buildings is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could benefit from more detailed financial information.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and there are no immediate indications of disputes. The mention of 'Maksetingimused on reguleeritud tehnilises kirjelduses ja hankelepingu projektis' (Payment terms are regulated in the technical specification and draft procurement contract) suggests regulatory compliance is addressed within the documentation.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of what is expected. The technical specifications are detailed enough to understand the scope of work. The evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as the lowest bid price.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the financing condition is stated as being in the technical specification and contract draft, which could be more directly presented. The number of attached documents is reasonable.

Fairness85/100

The tender is fair, with full document access implied through the e-procurement platform. The value is disclosed, deadlines are reasonable, and the evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective. The requirement to exclude subcontractors connected to the Russian Federation is a specific geopolitical consideration rather than a company-tailored requirement.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a URL for the opening place is provided. The contract duration is specified. However, detailed financing information beyond 'payment terms regulated in technical specification and contract draft' is not readily available in the basic information, and the contract start date is not explicitly stated.

Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates appear logical within the tender timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Strengths

Clear service description and technical requirements
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price)
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement platform
Specific exclusion criteria related to geopolitical concerns

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation)
Limited detail on financing conditions in basic information
Contract start date not explicitly stated

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability objectives or criteria.
2. Provide a clearer summary of payment terms and financing in the basic information section.
3. Specify the intended contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline