Skip to main content
Tenders

Increasing the nominal current of fuses at Leedripuu street 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, Tartu county, Tartu municipality, Raadi alevik (LC4688, LC4687, LC4737, LC4736, LC4735, LC4686)

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307903
Value
€26,879
Location
Estonia
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€26,879
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The procurement is announced for: Increasing the nominal current of fuses at Leedripuu street 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, Tartu county, Tartu municipality, Raadi alevik (LC4688, LC4687, LC4737, LC4736, LC4735, LC4686). The deadline for completion of works is 16.06.026. NB! Please pay attention to the document "P135 Standard Conditions for Electrical Installation Construction Works Contract ver. 23" which entered into force on 18.06.2024.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly stated beyond confirming compliance and experience.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidder must confirm they have no mandatory and voluntary exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidder must confirm their offer complies with the tender conditions.
--Bidder must possess the necessary switching rights.
--The person responsible for work operations must be registered in the Elektrilevi partner portal.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidder must have previous experience in performing similar electrical construction works contracts.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly stated beyond the value of past contracts.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307903_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.1 KB

Bidders must confirm their offer meets tender conditions, possess necessary switching rights, and have a designated responsible person registered in Elektrilevi's partner portal.

Varasemate hankelepingute informatsioonDOC
Varasemate_hankelepingute_informatsioon.docx -- 22.4 KB

The bidder must have completed at least three similar electrical construction contracts in the last 60 months, with at least one valued at €40,000 (excluding VAT).

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307903_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids based on economic advantage, with the lowest price being the best.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
307903_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 7.2 KB

The bidder must confirm the absence of mandatory and voluntary exclusion grounds and demonstrate prior experience in fulfilling similar electrical construction contracts.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for electrical installation works in Tartu County is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some practical aspects of submission could be improved.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The financing conditions are clearly outlined, although the payment terms are standard for the contract value. No immediate legal red flags were detected.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is specific, and the requirements for exclusion grounds, eligibility, and technical capability are documented. Evaluation criteria are mentioned as relative weighting, with the lowest price being the best, which is clear. However, the full scope of 'similar electrical construction works' could be more precisely defined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, duration, and contract start date. Key documents related to qualification and tender conditions are attached. However, some crucial documents like the task description and cost breakdown are in unsupported formats (.zip, .xls), hindering full analysis and potentially complicating bidder preparation.

Unsupported file formats for key tender documents (task description, cost breakdown).
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair, with a disclosed estimated value and objective criteria for evaluation (lowest price). The use of e-procurement and electronic submission promotes accessibility. Requirements for past experience are standard and not tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is mandated, which is practical. However, the contract start date is very close to the submission deadline, potentially leaving little time for contract finalization. The financing conditions, while clear, require bidders to navigate an external link for details on the factoring program.

Short timeframe between submission deadline and contract start date.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated logically. The tender status and dates are consistent, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which implies adherence to certain EU standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents provided.

Lack of explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Clear and specific title and description of works.
Well-defined eligibility and exclusion criteria.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Disclosed estimated value and objective evaluation criteria.

Concerns

Key tender documents (task description, cost breakdown) are in unsupported file formats.
Short timeframe between submission deadline and contract start date.
Absence of explicit sustainability or innovation requirements.

Recommendations

1. Provide key tender documents in universally accessible formats (e.g., PDF).
2. Consider extending the contract start date to allow for adequate preparation and contract finalization.
3. Incorporate specific green procurement or social responsibility criteria in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline