Skip to main content
Tenders

Design and construction of Kiiu waste station

Open
Deadline
24 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307897
Value
€719,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 24, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Kiiu waste station design and construction works100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€719,000
Duration
8 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The tender aims to carry out design and construction works for the purpose of establishing a new waste station at the address Kiiu-Valkla wastewater treatment plant, Kiiu village, Kuusalu municipality.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The tender duration is 8 months.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-20 06:00:00.
--Joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The contracting authority checks subcontractors for fraud, money laundering, terrorist financing, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.
--Bidders must confirm that their subcontractors and suppliers are not affiliated with the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The bidder must provide a bidder's pass as initial proof instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and expected response format.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Technical specifications define the technical requirements for the design and construction of the Kiiu waste station, including site preparation, infrastructure construction, utility connections, and service building construction.
--A site plan of the Kiiu waste station is provided for understanding the design and construction tender.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender value is 719,000.0 EUR.
--The bid price submission requires detailed pricing for design and construction works, including preparatory work and coverings.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307897_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds for fraud, money laundering, terrorist financing, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307897_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.6 KB

The bidder must confirm that their subcontractors and suppliers are not linked to the Russian Federation, and joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307897_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The tender evaluates the bid price, where the lowest price will receive the maximum score for the Kiiu waste station design and construction tender.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307897_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 75.0 KB

The tender pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as initial proof instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats.

HD Juhend pakkujaleDOC
HD Juhend pakkujale.docx -- 21.1 KB

This guide for bidders outlines the tender conditions, work requirements, and procurement process for the design and construction of the Kiiu waste station.

HD Lisa 1 lisa Kuusalu jäätmejaame asendiskeemPDF
HD Lisa 1 lisa_Kuusalu jäätmejaama asendiskee... -- 972.2 KB

This document presents the site plan for the Kiiu waste station, essential for understanding the design and construction tender requirements.

HD LISA 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
HD LISA 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 35.9 KB

This technical specification defines the technical requirements for the design and construction of the Kiiu waste station, including site preparation, infrastructure development, utility connections, and the construction of a service building.

HD LISA 2 Lepingu projektDOC
HD LISA 2 Lepingu projekt.docx -- 56.7 KB

This document is a draft contract outlining the terms and legal framework for the design and construction contract of the Kiiu waste station.

HD LISA 3 Pakkumuse maksumuse esildisXLS
HD LISA 3 Pakkumuse maksumuse esildis.xlsx -- 30.1 KB

The tender requires a bid cost submission detailing the pricing for design and construction works, including preparatory tasks and coverings.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the design and construction of a waste station in Kiiu is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some documentation formats are not machine-readable.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard procurement regulations, including proper CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The use of e-procurement is noted.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, and the requirements are documented through various attached documents. Evaluation criteria are specified, although the weighting is not detailed beyond cost being the primary factor. Conditions are generally clear.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the 'Additional Info' field states 'No' without further explanation, which could be more detailed. Some crucial documents like the contract draft and technical specifications are not marked as mandatory, which could lead to incomplete understanding for bidders.

Lack of detailed explanation in 'Additional Info' field.
Mandatory status not assigned to key documents like contract draft and technical specifications.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The value is disclosed, and criteria are objective (lowest price). The requirement for bidders to confirm subcontractors are not affiliated with the Russian Federation, while potentially justifiable for security reasons, could be perceived as a tailored requirement if not universally applied or clearly justified. Full document access is provided.

Requirement for bidders to confirm subcontractors are not affiliated with the Russian Federation may be perceived as tailored if not universally applied or clearly justified.
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-submission and e-procurement, which enhances practicality. A contract start date is not explicitly stated, and financing information is absent. The duration is specified, and a URL for the opening place is provided.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Financing information is absent.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logical within the context of the tender timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While EU funding is indicated, there are no specific sustainability criteria integrated into the evaluation or requirements.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social procurement criteria.

Strengths

Clear project description and objectives.
Use of e-procurement and e-submission.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Reasonable deadlines and clear procedure.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability considerations.
Absence of contract start date and financing information.
Potential for perceived tailored requirements regarding Russian Federation affiliation.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific green and social procurement criteria.
2. Provide clarity on the contract start date and financing details.
3. Ensure any specific affiliation requirements are universally applicable or clearly justified.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline