Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Summer Maintenance of Põltsamaa Municipality Roads 2026

Open
Deadline
2 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
307882
Value
€71,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of works according to the cost table data100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€71,000
Duration
9 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€265,238
Avg. Bids
2.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
90%
843 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Profiling of gravel roads, delivery of covering material to gravel roads, repair of potholes on asphalt roads, chip sealing, ditch excavation, and brush cutting.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

60%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender is a price-driven procurement for essential road maintenance services. A winning strategy will focus on delivering the lowest possible price while demonstrating robust technical capability and meticulous adherence to all submission requirements. Efficiency and cost control are paramount.

Key Winning Messages

Unbeatable Price for Essential Road Maintenance

Reliable and Efficient Execution of Summer Road Works

Key Opportunities
Price-driven evaluation offers a direct path to winning if the lowest bid is submitted.
The scope of work is clearly defined, allowing for precise cost estimation and operational planning.
The absence of social value or innovative aspects simplifies the bid preparation, allowing focus on core requirements.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the 100% cost evaluation criterion.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all potential cost-saving measures in operations and material sourcing, and aim for the absolute lowest viable price. Explore economies of scale if bidding for multiple similar contracts.

Risk of disqualification due to non-compliance with mandatory requirements or submission errors.

Implement a rigorous internal review process for all bid components, especially the Hankepass and cost table. Ensure all mandatory confirmations are provided and that the bid is 100% compliant. Double-check submission deadlines and formats.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A local or regional contractor with proven experience in gravel and asphalt road maintenance, possessing the necessary equipment and skilled workforce to execute the specified tasks efficiently. They should have a strong understanding of cost management and a streamlined operational model to offer a highly competitive price.
Key Requirements
Confirmation of bid compliance with all tender conditions; no conditional bids.
Accurate and complete completion of the Hankepass (ESPD).
Detailed and accurate cost table submission, reflecting all specified work volumes.
Demonstrated technical capability to perform grading, material hauling, pothole repair, ditch digging, and brush mowing.
Submission by the deadline: 2026-04-06 07:00:00.
Key Discriminators
The lowest price submitted.
Demonstrated operational efficiency leading to a highly competitive price.
Flawless bid submission, indicating attention to detail and reliability.
Social Value Opportunities
While not a mandatory requirement, consider subtly highlighting any existing local employment practices or sustainable material sourcing if it can be done without increasing costs, as a minor differentiator if competitors are purely price-focused.
Bid Focus Areas
Total cost of works100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price by optimizing operational efficiency, minimizing overheads, and securing competitive material costs. Ensure all volumes in the cost table are accurately reflected and that no additional costs are inadvertently included.

Recommendations5
Aggressively Price for the Lowest Bid
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% cost evaluation, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible price that is still profitable. Conduct a detailed cost breakdown for each line item in the work volume table, identifying all potential efficiencies and cost-saving opportunities. This may involve optimizing equipment usage, efficient material sourcing, and streamlined logistics.

Directly maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Ensure 100% Hankepass Compliance
CriticalMed effort

The Hankepass (ESPD) is a critical component. Ensure it is completed accurately, comprehensively, and without any conditional statements. Any omissions or errors can lead to disqualification. Treat it as a self-declaration of capability and compliance.

Prevents disqualification and ensures the bid is considered.
Meticulous Cost Table Completion
CriticalMed effort

The 'Lisa 2. Töömahtude tabel - greiderdamine 2026' must be filled out with extreme precision. Any discrepancies between the stated volumes and the contractor's proposed costs can raise red flags or lead to miscalculations in the evaluation. Ensure all specified roads and lengths are accounted for.

Ensures accurate evaluation and prevents potential disputes or disqualification based on cost misrepresentation.
Implement a Bid Review Checklist
HighLow effort

Develop and use a comprehensive checklist for bid submission. This checklist should cover all mandatory requirements, eligibility criteria, Hankepass completeness, cost table accuracy, and submission deadline adherence. A final review by a senior team member not involved in the bid preparation is recommended.

Minimizes the risk of human error and disqualification due to overlooked requirements.
Highlight Operational Efficiency
MediumLow effort

While not explicitly evaluated, subtly communicate operational efficiency in the Hankepass or any accompanying documentation. This can be framed as the reason for the competitive pricing. For example, mentioning modern equipment or streamlined processes that allow for cost-effective service delivery.

Subtly reinforces the value proposition of a low price, making it seem more sustainable and less risky.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution for essential road maintenance, emphasizing efficiency and reliability. If competitors are likely to bid very low, focus on demonstrating that your low price is achievable through genuine operational advantages rather than unsustainable practices.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (4)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm that their bid complies with all conditions set out in the tender documents. Conditional bids are not allowed.
--The Hankepass is the bidder's own confirmation, serving as preliminary evidence in lieu of certificates issued by authorities or third parties. It contains the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses.
--The bid must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-06 07:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must confirm that their bid complies with all conditions set out in the tender documents. Conditional bids are not allowed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The Hankepass is the bidder's own confirmation, serving as preliminary evidence in lieu of certificates issued by authorities or third parties. It contains the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The tender involves summer maintenance of Põltsamaa municipality roads in 2026, including grading of gravel roads and adding surfacing material, with technical requirements and volumes specified.
--The scope of grading works is detailed in a table including road numbers, names, and section lengths.
--The contract project outlines the contractor's obligations for maintaining gravel roads, repairing potholes, digging ditches, and mowing brush.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The estimated cost of the procurement exceeds the public procurement threshold.
--The cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307882_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 2.6 KB

Bidders must confirm that their bid meets all conditions set forth in the tender documents; conditional bids are not permitted.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307882_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307882_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.1 KB

The procurement pass is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and the format of expected responses.

Lisa 1. Suvehoolde tehniline kirjeldus 2026DOC
Lisa 1 -Suvehoolde tehniline kirjeldus 2026.d... -- 21.0 KB

This document details the summer maintenance of Põltsamaa municipality's roads in 2026, including gravel road grading and material addition, specifying technical requirements and volumes for the works.

Lisa 2. Töömahtude tabel - greiderdamine 2026XLS
Lisa 2 - Töömahtude tabel - greiderdamine 202... -- 23.9 KB

This document presents a table of grading work volumes for the Põltsamaa municipality's summer road maintenance 2026 tender, detailing road numbers, names, and section lengths.

Lisa 3. Lepingu projekt - Suvehoole 2026DOC
Lisa 3 - Lepingu projekt - Suvehoole 2026.doc... -- 22.8 KB

This document is a draft contract for the summer maintenance of Põltsamaa municipality roads, outlining the contractor's obligations for gravel road maintenance, pothole repair, ditch digging, and brush cutting.

Lisa 4. Töömahtude ja maksumuste tabelXLS
Lisa 4 - Töömahtude ja maksumuste tabel.xlsx -- 11.3 KB

This document presents a detailed table of work volumes and costs that bidders must evaluate and fill out for the Põltsamaa municipality's summer road maintenance works in 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for summer road maintenance in Põltsamaa municipality is generally well-structured, with clear technical specifications and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on self-declaration for eligibility.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. The estimated value exceeding the national threshold is justified.

Clarity80/100

The description of works is detailed, and technical specifications are provided in separate documents. The evaluation criteria are clearly stated as the lowest price. The Hankepass format is specified.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the contract start date is not explicitly stated, and while documents are attached, the specific content of some (like the ESPD XML) is not fully analyzable by AI.

Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement and electronic submission, promoting fairness. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective. The use of Hankepass as preliminary evidence is a common practice, but full document access is assumed through the e-procurement platform.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. The contract duration is specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed beyond the estimated value. The contract start date is not provided, which could impact planning.

Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. Dates appear logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of green procurement criteria
Absence of social considerations

Strengths

Clear technical specifications and scope of work
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price)
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Well-defined CPV code and location

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria
Contract start date not specified
Reliance on self-declaration (Hankepass) for eligibility

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability or social criteria into the evaluation.
2. Specify the contract start date for better bidder planning.
3. Provide more detail on the expected format or interpretation of the ESPD XML document if it's critical.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline