Skip to main content
Tenders

Reconstruction of Põltsamaa heating pipelines

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307876
Value
€68,842
Location
Estonia
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€68,842
Duration
7 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Reconstruction of Põltsamaa heating pipelines in 2026, execution of construction works.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (9)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--Bidders must submit Form 3, a table for detailed description of the bid cost for the Põltsamaa heating pipeline reconstruction project.
--Bidders must submit Form 4 containing details of the project's lead key person's education, certificates, and work experience, including descriptions of previous pipeline reconstruction projects.
--Bidders must submit Form 1 listing previous similar projects with client details and work specifics to prove experience and qualification.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must confirm they do not fall under grounds for exclusion from the tender procedure, including crimes, tax debts, and sanctions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit conformity conditions covering trade secrets, power of attorney for joint bidders, bid submission, and bid security to ensure compliance with tender documents.
--Bidders must submit Form 1 listing previous similar projects with client details and work specifics to prove experience and qualification.
--Bidders must submit Form 4 containing details of the project's lead key person's education, certificates, and work experience, including descriptions of previous pipeline reconstruction projects.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit a detailed work organization plan and a weekly precise schedule, describing quality assurance, material storage, waste management, and work planning.
--Bidders must submit a list of materials consistent with Logstor products or equivalent alternatives, considering necessary supplies and specifying quantities during the works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids will be evaluated primarily on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--Bidders must submit Form 3, a table for detailed description of the bid cost for the Põltsamaa heating pipeline reconstruction project.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307876_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.5 KB

Bidders must submit compliance conditions covering trade secrets, joint bidder power of attorney, bid submission, and bid security to ensure adherence to tender documents.

Vorm 1 - Tehtud töödDOC
Vorm 1 - tehtud tööd (Põltsamaa).docx -- 23.5 KB

The bidder must submit Form 1, listing previous similar projects with client details and work specifics, to demonstrate their experience and qualifications.

Vorm 3 - Pakkumuse maksumuse tabelXLS
Vorm 3 - Hinnapakkumise vorm (Põltsamaa).xlsx -- 23.6 KB

Bidders must submit Form 3, a table detailing the cost breakdown for the Põltsamaa district heating pipeline reconstruction project.

Vorm 4 - spetsialistide andmedDOC
Vorm 4 - votmeisikute andmed (Põltsamaa).docx -- 24.7 KB

Bidders must submit Form 4, detailing the education, certifications, and work experience of the key project management personnel, including descriptions of previous pipeline reconstruction projects.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307876_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

In the Põltsamaa district heating pipeline reconstruction tender, bids will be evaluated primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
307876_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 8.4 KB

Bidders must confirm they do not fall under exclusion grounds, which cover criminal offenses, tax debts, and sanctions.

Ehitajale üleantava materjalide loeteluXLS
Ehitajale üleantava _materjalide-loetelu.xlsx -- 39.8 KB

Bidders must submit a list of materials consistent with Logstor products or equivalent alternatives, accounting for necessary accessories and specifying quantities during the works.

Hanke korraldusDOC
Hanke korraldus_Põltsamaa.docx -- 27.2 KB

The tender document outlines the organization of the Põltsamaa district heating pipeline reconstruction tender, including stages, bid submission, qualification, and negotiations.

Nõuded tööde läbiviimise kavale ja ajagraafikuleDOC
Nõuded tööde läbiviimise kavale ja ajagraafik... -- 25.6 KB

Bidders must submit a detailed work execution plan and a weekly schedule, describing quality assurance, material storage, waste management, and work planning.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the reconstruction of heating pipelines in Põltsamaa is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process primarily based on cost. However, it lacks explicit sustainability criteria and some practical aspects of e-submission could be improved.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to most legal compliance aspects, including a clear procedure and proper CPV code. The mention that it's not a public procurement under the Public Procurement Act and that disputes cannot be filed with the Public Procurement Disputes Committee is noted. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the tender's scope. The EU funding aspect is positive for regulatory alignment.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear. Requirements are documented through various forms and specifications. Evaluation criteria are specified as 'relative_weighting' with a primary focus on cost, which is clear. Conditions are stated to be in the contract project and other documents.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, value, and duration. Key documents like exclusion grounds, conformity conditions, evaluation criteria, technical specifications, and submission forms are indicated. However, the contract project and work project are in unsupported zip formats, hindering full analysis.

Contract project and work project documents are in unsupported .zip format.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. Deadlines are reasonable. The evaluation criteria are objective (lowest price). The use of 'or equivalent' for references to specific products or legal bases promotes fairness. E-procurement is indicated.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are mentioned, which is positive. However, the contract start date is not explicitly stated, and the financing information is limited to 'EU Funded'. The duration is specified, but the practicalities of accessing all tender documents (due to zip format) could pose a minor challenge.

Contract start date is not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, deadlines, and duration are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded, which implies adherence to certain EU standards. However, there are no explicit requirements for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information. This is a missed opportunity to promote sustainable practices.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear primary evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Inclusion of 'or equivalent' clause promotes competition.
Mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements are well-defined.
E-submission and e-procurement are supported.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Contract project and work project documents are in unsupported .zip format.
Contract start date is not explicitly stated.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility) into the evaluation.
2. Provide tender documents in accessible formats (e.g., PDF) instead of .zip files.
3. Clearly state the contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline