Skip to main content
Tenders

Renovation of the organ of the Estonia Concert Hall of the Foundation Eesti Kontsert

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307871
Value
€150,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of works100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Tender Opening

March 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 03, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€150,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Information in technical specification Annex 1
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

8 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit the cost and technical description according to the required structure.
--The tender cannot be divided into parts.
--Deadline for submission: 2026-03-27 10:00:00
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds mentioned in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must confirm their bid complies with all tender document conditions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders' technical competence and experience will be assessed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on the cost of the works, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--The value of the tender is 150,000.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307871_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 4.2 KB

Bidders must confirm that their bid meets all tender document conditions, including submitting the bid price and technical description according to the required structure.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307871_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids primarily based on the cost of works, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307871_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 65.3 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the company, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not intended for completion.

HDDOC
Estonia oreli remont 3.docx -- 47.9 KB

Sihtasutus Eesti Kontsert invites bids for the renovation of the Estonia concert hall organ, assessing bidders' technical competence and experience.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the renovation of the Estonia concert hall organ is generally well-structured, with clear financial information and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit details on sustainability and innovation, and the reliance on external documents for technical specifications could be improved.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations. The CPV code is provided, and the procedure type is indicated. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. The value is classified, which is standard practice.

Clarity80/100

The core information is present, but detailed technical specifications are referenced in 'Lisa 1' (Annex 1), which is not directly accessible in the provided text. The evaluation criteria are stated as 'relative_weighting' with a focus on cost, but the exact weighting is not detailed here.

Technical specifications are referenced externally.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the full technical description is not embedded, and the 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega' is noted as not for completion, which might cause confusion. The ESPD document is in an XML format not analyzed.

Full technical description not embedded.
Ambiguity regarding the purpose of 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega'.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open to electronic submission and e-procurement. The evaluation is primarily based on the lowest price, which is an objective criterion. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. Full document access is assumed via the e-procurement portal.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are facilitated. The contract start date is specified. However, the financing information is not detailed, and the reliance on external documents for technical details impacts practicality.

Reliance on external documents for technical specifications.
Lack of detailed financing information.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. The tender is active and not suspended. Dates are logically sequenced (Reveal, Submission, Opening).

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation as mandatory criteria, although 'Innovation Focus' is listed as a characteristic. The tender is not explicitly stated as EU funded.

Lack of explicit green or social procurement criteria.
Innovation focus is listed as a characteristic but not detailed as a requirement.

Strengths

Clear financial information and estimated value.
Reasonable and logical timeline for submission and opening.
Utilizes e-procurement and electronic submission.
Objective primary evaluation criterion (lowest price).

Concerns

Technical specifications are referenced externally, requiring bidders to access additional documents.
Limited explicit information on sustainability and social aspects.
The purpose of 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega' could be clearer.

Recommendations

1. Embed key technical specifications directly within the tender documents or provide direct, stable links.
2. Clearly outline any sustainability or social value criteria to encourage broader participation and align with modern procurement standards.
3. Clarify the role and intended use of all provided documents, especially those marked as 'not for completion'.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline