Skip to main content
Tenders

Replacement of four bollards at Pier No. 6 of Paldiski South Harbour

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307870
Value
€150,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 23, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid price (EUR, excluding VAT)100%
Fulfilled contractExperience
Environmentally friendly conditionsEnvironmental
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€150,000
Duration
9 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€229,746
Avg. Bids
2.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
82%
1,056 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The public procurement concerns the replacement of four bollards at Pier No. 6 of Paldiski South Harbour, including the dismantling of existing bollard systems and the procurement, delivery, and installation of new bollards. The technical specification is provided in Annex 1 of the tender documents.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (8)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The deadline for submitting bids is April 7, 2026, at 09:00.
--The successful bidder must sign and return the contract to the contracting authority no later than 7 calendar days after receiving the prepared contract.
--The contracting authority may extend the signing deadline for a valid reason, notifying the successful bidder in writing.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must prove they do not have exclusion grounds as stipulated in Section 95 of the Public Procurement Act (RHS § 95).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Bidders must have fulfilled at least one contract for the procurement, delivery, and installation of port bollards with a value of at least EUR 75,000 within the last 60 months.
--Bidders must confirm compliance with the conformity requirements.
--Bidders must submit a technical description.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Submission of a technical description is required.
--Confirmation of environmentally friendly work is required.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The value of the fulfilled contract for procurement, delivery, and installation of port bollards must be at least EUR 75,000 within the last 60 months.
--The bid price must be specified.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307870_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.8 KB

The contracting authority requires bidders to confirm compliance conditions, submit technical specifications, detail the bid price, and confirm the absence of international sanctions, while ensuring environmentally friendly work.

Pakkuja esitab täidetud lepingu andmed Lisa 3 vormil.DOC
Lisa 3 Täidetud lepingu andmed viitenr 307870... -- 47.3 KB

Bidders must submit completed contract data on Form Annex 3, proving at least one prior contract for the procurement, delivery, and installation of two or more plate winches on port quay(s) valued at a minimum of 75,000 EUR within the last 60 months.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307870_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
307870_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 12.5 KB

Bidders must confirm the absence of exclusion grounds as per RHS § 95 and demonstrate at least one completed contract in the last 60 months for the procurement, supply, and installation of at least two quay fenders with a total value of at least €75,000.

Lisa 5 Teise isiku (alltöövõtja) nõusolek kvalifitseerimise tingimustele tuginem...DOC
Lisa 5 Teise isiku (alltöövõtja) nõusoleku vo... -- 24.2 KB

This document is a subcontractor's consent, confirming that the bidder may rely on the subcontractor's qualifications to prove tender eligibility.

Lisa 6 Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Lisa 6 Ühispakkujate_volikiri viitenr 307870.... -- 16.3 KB

This document is a joint bidder's power of attorney, authorizing one bidder to submit a tender on behalf of others for the Paldiski South Harbour pier no. 6 four bollard replacement tender.

RHAD Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekPDF
RHAD (lihthange) PL kai 6 vendrid viitenr 307... -- 294.0 KB

This document outlines the proposal for submitting bids for the replacement of fenders at Paldiski South Harbour pier no. 6, specifying deadlines, participation conditions, and referencing additional base documents.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the replacement of bollards at Paldiski South Harbour is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and good data consistency. However, it could benefit from more explicit sustainability integration and clearer guidance on specific document accessibility.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance requirements, with a clear CPV code and a stated procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the tender type. No major disputes are indicated. The references to the Public Procurement Act (RHS) suggest adherence to Estonian procurement law.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements are generally well-documented. The evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting, and conditions are outlined. The technical specification is referenced as an attachment, contributing to clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the specific contents of the .zip and .xls files (Technical Specification, Contract Project, Cost Table) are not fully analyzed, which might affect the completeness score if crucial details are contained within. The contract duration and tender validity are specified.

Key details might be within inaccessible file formats (.zip, .xls) for analysis.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access by referencing them. The estimated value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable. Evaluation is based on relative weighting, suggesting objective criteria. E-procurement is specified, promoting fairness.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are specified. However, the 'Contract start date' is not explicitly stated, only the 'Contract Duration' and a completion deadline based on contract signing. Financing information is linked to the contract project, which requires access to potentially inaccessible files.

Contract start date is not explicitly defined.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided for reveal, submission, and opening are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic. However, specific social aspects or innovation focuses are not detailed in the provided text. The funding source (EU funded) is not specified, which limits this score.

Lack of specific details on social criteria or innovation.

Strengths

Clear description of works and clear referencing of technical specifications.
Good data consistency with key fields populated and logical date sequencing.
Emphasis on e-procurement and electronic submission.
Specific eligibility requirements related to past performance are defined.

Concerns

Potential reliance on information within unanalyzed file formats (.zip, .xls) for full understanding of completeness.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Limited explicit detail on sustainability beyond 'Green Procurement'.

Recommendations

1. Ensure that all crucial information is accessible and interpretable by potential bidders, even if contained in complex file formats.
2. Explicitly state the contract start date or the mechanism for its determination.
3. Provide more detailed information regarding the 'Green Procurement' aspects and any social or innovation objectives.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline