Skip to main content
Tenders

Design of the reconstruction of Võnnu Secondary School

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
307860
Value
€80,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 26, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of design works100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€80,000
Duration
8 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Design works for the reconstruction of the Võnnu Secondary School building located at Tartu 34, Võnnu alevik, Kastre municipality.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (7)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-13 07:00:00.
--The tender is for design services with a duration of 8 months.
--The value of the tender is 80000.0 EUR.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tender is not divided into parts because the object of the procurement forms a single whole and it is not reasonable to divide it into parts to achieve a quality end result.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must accept the tender conditions by submitting a bid.
--Joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Bidders must submit CVs for the project manager and architect, including work experience and descriptions of previous projects.
--The project manager and architect's CVs will be used to assess qualifications.
--The tender is for architectural design services for the reconstruction of Võnnu Keskkool.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidding price must be submitted according to a defined structure.
--The cost of design works will be evaluated, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307860_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 4.3 KB

This document outlines the requirements for submitting a joint bidder power of attorney and confirms acceptance of tender conditions upon submission, also requiring the bid price to be presented in a specified structure.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307860_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.2 KB

The tender evaluates the cost of design works, where the lowest price receives the maximum score, and bidders must account for all necessary works.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307860_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.1 KB

The procurement pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and expected response format, but is not intended for completion.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 73.4 KB

This technical specification defines the requirements for the design work of the Võnnu Secondary School reconstruction, including functionality, compliance with legislation, material durability, and specific requirements for external utilities, ventilation, cooling, and heating supply.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 53.8 KB

This document is a draft design works contract outlining the obligations of the client and contractor, payment terms, and deadlines for the reconstruction design of Võnnu Secondary School.

Lisa 3 RuumiprogrammXLS
Lisa 3 Ruumiprogramm.xlsx -- 16.0 KB

The tender seeks design services for the reconstruction of Võnnu Secondary School, detailing required rooms and their sizes based on student and user numbers.

Lisa 4 Hooneautomaatika kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 4 Hooneautomaatika kirjeldus.docx -- 387.1 KB

This document outlines the required solutions for building automation, heating systems, and ventilation specific parts within the Võnnu Secondary School reconstruction design project.

RHAD alusdokument (Võnnu Keskkooli rekonstrueerimise projekteerimine)DOC
RHAD alusdokument (Võnnu Keskkooli rekonstrue... -- 31.2 KB

This tender's foundational document outlines an open procurement procedure for the design of the Võnnu Secondary School reconstruction, aiming to select a provider for architectural design services.

Vorm 1DOC
Vorm 1.doc -- 32.5 KB

Form 1 is a general document containing important information and requirements for the procurement procedure that must be considered during submission.

Vorm 2DOC
Vorm 2.docx -- 24.4 KB

The contracting authority requires the submission of CVs for the project manager and architect, detailing work experience and past project descriptions to assess qualifications.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for architectural design services for the Võnnu Secondary School reconstruction is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve on the accessibility of all required documents.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and there are no reported disputes. The procedure type 'A' (Open Procedure) is standard.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of the technical and eligibility criteria. Key documents like technical specifications and room programs are referenced, contributing to clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the AI notes that not all documents might be easily accessible or fully detailed within the provided text, impacting overall completeness.

Some documents may not be fully accessible or detailed within the provided text.
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the evaluation criteria are based on relative weighting, which is objective. The value is disclosed, and e-procurement is utilized. No specific tailoring to individual companies was detected.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are confirmed. The contract duration and start date (implied by reveal date and submission deadline) are reasonable. However, specific financing information beyond the estimated value is not detailed.

Specific financing details beyond the estimated value are not explicitly provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated correctly. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social responsibility considerations.

Strengths

Clear project description and objectives.
Well-defined technical and eligibility requirements.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Reasonable timeline and disclosed estimated value.

Concerns

Limited explicit sustainability considerations.
Potential accessibility issues with some supporting documents.
Lack of detailed financing information.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., energy efficiency, sustainable materials) into the evaluation.
2. Ensure all tender documents are easily accessible and clearly linked within the procurement portal.
3. Provide more detailed information regarding financing arrangements if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline