Skip to main content
Tenders

Haabneeme Beach Lifeguard Service 2026-2030

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
307841
Value
€180,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of lifeguard service for 51 months100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€180,000
Duration
51 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Lifeguard service will be provided during the beach seasons of 2026-2030 as follows: June 1st - August 31st daily from 10:00 to 20:00, except for the period from July 1st to July 31st, when the service must be provided daily from 09:00 to 22:00. Period length 51 months.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--The tender is for the Haabneeme lifeguard service from 2026-2030.
--The contract duration is 51 months.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-06 07:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The contracting authority has not divided the public procurement into parts because the subject of the public procurement is a uniform service (lifeguard service), the division of which into parts is not expedient (RHS § 27 para 2).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must confirm that their lifeguards possess a professional certificate.
--Bidders must confirm that their lifeguards have completed first aid training.
--Bidders must confirm that their lifeguards meet language requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Lifeguards must possess professional qualifications.
--Lifeguards must possess first aid skills.
--The service includes detailed data on first aid provided, rescues from drowning risk, public order violations, and other incidents related to the provision of lifeguard services.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total cost of the lifeguard service is the evaluation criterion.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307841_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 4.0 KB

Bidders must confirm that their lifeguards hold a professional certificate, have completed first aid training, and meet language requirements, and that joint bidders have submitted a power of attorney.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307841_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The tender evaluation criteria focus on the total cost of the lifeguard service, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307841_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.6 KB

The procurement passport (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats.

Lisa 2- Haabneeme rannavalveteenuse statistilise aruande tabelXLS
Lisa 2- Haabneeme rannavalveteenuse statistil... -- 9.8 KB

The tender requires a statistical report detailing first aid provided, rescues from drowning, public order violations, and other incidents related to the provision of beach lifeguard services.

Rannavalveteenuse tehnilised tingimused Lisa 1DOC
Rannavalveteenuse tehnilised tingimused Lisa ... -- 28.4 KB

This document outlines the technical conditions and requirements for the Haabneeme lifeguard service, including the professional qualifications and first aid skills of lifeguards.

Töövõtulepingu projekt, Rannavalveteenus 2026-2030DOC
Töövõtulepingu projekt, Rannavalveteenus 2026... -- 208.4 KB

This document is a draft contract outlining the terms and requirements for the Haabneeme beach lifeguard service from 2026-2030, including service provision details and the obligations of the contracting parties.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for lifeguard services is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve in terms of document accessibility for certain formats.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The financing condition is linked to the draft contract, which is standard.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service, including operating hours and seasonal variations, is clear. Eligibility and technical requirements are documented, and evaluation criteria are specified. Conditions for participation are also outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the XML format of the ESPD is not directly analyzable, and the 'Required: No' for some key documents like 'Hindamiskriteeriumid' and 'Lepingu Mall' could be confusing, although their content is summarized.

XML format of ESPD not directly analyzable.
Key documents marked as 'Required: No' despite being essential for understanding the tender.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the value is disclosed. Criteria are objective (total cost). The access to documents is generally good, though the XML ESPD is a minor hurdle. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. The contract start date is implied by the duration and reveal date, but not explicitly stated. Financing information is linked to the contract draft. The duration is clearly specified.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logical.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded, which limits the potential for integrated sustainability measures.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social or innovation considerations.

Strengths

Clear service description and operational hours.
Well-defined eligibility and technical requirements.
Objective evaluation criterion (total cost).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.

Concerns

Limited sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).
Inconsistent marking of document requirements ('Required: No' for key documents).
XML ESPD format not directly accessible for analysis.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate explicit sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility).
2. Clearly mark all essential tender documents as 'Required: Yes'.
3. Provide key documents in more universally accessible formats if possible.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline