Skip to main content
Tenders

Ordering of Security Services for the Estonian Museum of History from 01.10.2026-30.09.2029

Open
Deadline
21 days left
April 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Research
Reference
307837
Value
€497,939
Location
Estonia
Published
March 25, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 17, 2026

Tender Opening

April 17, 2026

Contract Start Date

September 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€497,939
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Research
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€100,264
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
87%
624 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of organizing the public procurement is to order security services for two objects of the Estonian Museum of History. The procurement is not divided into lots, as it concerns a single object. Dividing into lots (manned and technical security services) would lead to unreasonably high costs and security risks if different companies provided the security services.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bids must be submitted electronically.
--Bids can only be submitted after familiarizing oneself with the location of the manned guarding contract execution and signing a confirmation on-site by the bidder's representative.
--All clarification requests concerning property-specific technical descriptions, which participants must treat as confidential, will be answered by the contracting authority through the eRHR environment.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders will be evaluated based on exclusion grounds, including past contract breaches and submission of false information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm fulfillment of qualification requirements, including required net turnover and reference contracts for security services.
--Bidders must submit a declaration of participation in the public procurement, confirming agreement with the terms and compliance of the bid.
--For joint bids, one bidder must be authorized to represent the joint bid via a power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Project manager must have a professional qualification (Security Manager, level 5) and at least 3 years of experience in managing security services, including specific references.
--The contracting authority will verify the project manager's work experience as a security service project manager at the reference object submitted by the bidder.
--Bidders must provide a CV for the project manager detailing education, professional certificates, and at least 3 years of experience in managing security services, including specific references.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit a bid cost table detailing prices for security services, including regular and additional services, and accounting for the contracting authority's reserve.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307837_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.1 KB

The tender document "Compliance Conditions" outlines requirements for joint bidder representation, power of attorney submission, bid cost presentation structure, and project manager professional qualifications and work experience for the security services tender.

Vorm 1 – Kvalifitseerimistingimuste täitmise kinnitamiseks esitatavad andmedDOC
Vorm 1 – Kvalifitseerimistingimuste täitmise ... -- 27.8 KB

This document is a form to confirm fulfillment of qualification requirements stated in the tender notice, including required net turnover and reference contracts for security services.

Vorm 2 – Ühise pakkumuse volikiriDOC
Vorm 2 - Ühise pakkumuse volikiri.docx -- 13.8 KB

This document is a power of attorney, authorizing one bidder to represent a joint bid in the public procurement.

Vorm 3 – Pakkumuse maksumuse tabelXLS
Vorm 3 - Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel.xlsx -- 28.6 KB

Bidders must submit Form 3 – Tender Cost Table, detailing pricing for security services including regular and additional services, and accounting for the contracting authority's reserve.

Vorm 4 – Projektijuhi CVDOC
Vorm 4 - Projektijuhi CV.docx -- 26.5 KB

The bidder must submit a Project Manager's CV including education, professional certifications (Security Manager, level 5), and at least 3 years of experience in managing security services, with specific references.

Vorm 5 – Tellija kinnitusDOC
Vorm 5 - Tellija kinnitus.docx -- 24.4 KB

The client's confirmation verifies the project manager's work experience as a security service project manager at the bidder's reference object.

Vorm 6 – Riigihankel osalemise avaldusDOC
Vorm 6 - Riigihankel osalemise avaldus.docx -- 23.6 KB

This form is an application to participate in the public procurement, confirming acceptance of terms and compliance of the bid.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307837_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
307837_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 12.6 KB

This document outlines exclusion grounds and qualification conditions used for bidder evaluation, including past contract breaches and submission of false information.

Lepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt_korrashoiuteenus_... -- 105.6 KB

The draft contract defines the general and specific terms for the security service, including definitions, contact details for the client and contractor, and details for contract execution.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekDOC
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.docx -- 49.1 KB

Riigi Kinnisvara AS invites bids for the security services tender for the Estonian History Museum, covering manned and technical security services from 01.10.2026-30.09.2029, with bids to be submitted electronically.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for security services for the Estonian History Museum is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has some practical limitations regarding site visits.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements for public procurement. The CPV code is specified, and the procedure is identified. Deadlines are reasonable, and there is no indication of disputes. The reference to RHS § 77 lg 3 suggests adherence to specific Estonian legal frameworks for information protection.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service required is clear, and the documents outline the necessary qualification and technical requirements. The evaluation criteria are stated as relative weighting, with cost being the primary factor, which is understandable for this type of service.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the 'Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek' document, which contains crucial details like site visit information and specific technical requirements, is not explicitly attached but referenced, which could be a minor point of incompleteness for immediate review.

Key document ('Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek') referenced but not directly attached for immediate review.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting fairness. Objective criteria are used, with cost being the main evaluation factor. The requirement for an on-site visit and signing a confirmation before submission, while ensuring familiarity, could pose a logistical challenge for bidders located far from Tallinn.

Mandatory on-site visit and confirmation signing may pose logistical challenges for distant bidders.
Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, which is practical. However, the requirement for an on-site visit and signing a confirmation before submission adds a mandatory physical step that might not be ideal for all potential bidders, especially those not based locally. Financing information is not explicitly detailed beyond the estimated value.

Mandatory on-site visit and confirmation signing adds a physical step to the e-submission process.
Specific financing details beyond estimated value are not explicitly provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The contract start date is set well in advance of the submission deadline, allowing for contract award and preparation.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While the service itself might have indirect sustainability implications, there are no specific criteria or requirements to promote these aspects, which is a missed opportunity.

Lack of explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Clear and well-defined technical and qualification requirements.
Use of e-procurement for submission and communication.
Logical and consistent data presentation.
Specific CPV code provided.

Concerns

Mandatory on-site visit and confirmation signing may create logistical barriers.
Absence of explicit sustainability criteria.
Key document referenced but not directly attached.

Recommendations

1. Consider providing direct links to all essential tender documents within the main notice.
2. Explore options for virtual site visits or alternative confirmation methods to improve accessibility.
3. Incorporate sustainability criteria in future tenders to align with broader policy goals.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline