Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Purchase of an ultra-low temperature freezer and a cell counter

Open
Deadline
16 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307796
Value
€19,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost (EUR, excluding VAT)100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€19,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€72,774
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
93%
884 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of this procurement procedure is the purchase of an ultra-low temperature freezer and a cell counter in accordance with the technical specification submitted by the contracting authority. The public procurement is divided into lots. Bids can be submitted for one or more lots: Lot 1 – Ultra-low temperature freezer (-86 C) kit for sample storage Lot 2 – Benchtop automatic cell counter kit The handover deadline for the equipment in both lots is no later than 4 (four) months from the conclusion of the procurement contract.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for an ultra-low temperature freezer and cell counter is heavily weighted on cost (100%). Bidders must meticulously meet technical specifications and offer a highly competitive price. Differentiation will come from demonstrating superior value through bundled offerings or extended support, despite the lack of explicit social or innovative aspects.

Key Winning Messages

Uncompromising Technical Compliance at the Most Competitive Price.

Reliable Delivery and Seamless Integration for Tartu Ülikool's Research Needs.

Key Opportunities
Bundling both lots for a potentially more attractive overall price and simplified logistics for the client.
Leveraging existing supplier relationships or framework agreements with Tartu Ülikool to demonstrate understanding of their needs and potentially offer preferential pricing.
Offering extended warranty or enhanced after-sales support as a value-add, even if not explicitly requested, to differentiate on service.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings. Explore supplier discounts, optimize logistics, and ensure efficient internal processes to present the lowest possible compliant price.

Strict adherence to technical specifications, especially for the ultra-low temperature freezer, with a requirement for proof of equivalence if not a direct match.

Carefully review all technical specifications. If offering an alternative, proactively gather all necessary documentation and certifications to demonstrate equivalence. Engage with technical teams to ensure full understanding and compliance.

Meeting the tight 4-month delivery deadline.

Assess current stock levels and supplier lead times for both items. Develop a robust project plan for procurement, assembly (if applicable), and delivery. Clearly communicate the delivery plan in the bid.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A supplier with a strong existing relationship with Tartu Ülikool, offering a cost-effective and technically compliant solution for both Lot 1 and Lot 2. They should have a streamlined procurement and delivery process to meet the 4-month deadline and possess excellent after-sales support capabilities.
Key Requirements
Meeting all technical specifications for both the ultra-low temperature freezer and the cell counter.
Submission of a compliant bid with accurate costings for both lots.
Adherence to the 4-month delivery deadline.
Confirmation of agreement to tender conditions and authorization.
Provision of proof of equivalence if not a direct match to standards for the freezer.
Key Discriminators
The lowest compliant price for one or both lots.
Demonstrated ability to deliver both the ultra-low temperature freezer and cell counter within the 4-month timeframe.
Exceptional after-sales support and technical assistance beyond the minimum requirements.
Social Value Opportunities
While not a requirement, consider including a commitment to local employment or training opportunities during the installation or maintenance phase, if feasible and cost-neutral. This can be a subtle differentiator.
Bid Focus Areas
Total bid cost (EUR, excluding VAT)100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible compliant price. Conduct detailed cost breakdowns for each component and accessory. Explore all avenues for cost reduction without compromising technical compliance or delivery timelines.

Recommendations5
Meticulously Verify Technical Specifications
CriticalHigh effort

Thoroughly review and cross-reference all technical specifications for both the ultra-low temperature freezer and the cell counter against the proposed equipment. Pay close attention to capacity, temperature, dimensions, storage solutions, cooling reagent, and warranty for the freezer, and cell concentration, viability, and morphological parameters for the cell counter. If offering an alternative for the freezer, ensure all documentation proving equivalence is readily available and clearly presented.

Ensures bid compliance and avoids disqualification.
Aggressively Price for Cost Leadership
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% weighting on total bid cost, every effort must be made to submit the most competitive price. This involves detailed cost analysis, negotiating with suppliers, optimizing logistics, and identifying internal efficiencies. Ensure the price is fixed and unconditional as per the tender requirements.

Directly maximizes score in the sole evaluation criterion.
Confirm and Document Delivery Capability
CriticalMed effort

Develop a clear and achievable delivery plan that guarantees equipment handover within the 4-month deadline from contract signing. This plan should be detailed enough to instill confidence in the contracting authority. Highlight any existing logistical advantages or streamlined processes.

Mitigates risk of disqualification due to non-compliance with delivery timeline.
Offer Enhanced Support or Extended Warranty
MediumMed effort

While cost is paramount, consider offering an extended warranty or superior after-sales support package for either or both pieces of equipment. This can be presented as a value-add that mitigates long-term operational risks for Tartu Ülikool, potentially swaying decision-makers if bids are very close on price.

Provides a competitive edge beyond pure cost.
Thoroughly Review and Complete All Forms
HighMed effort

Ensure all required forms, including those for cost submission, power of attorney, and any confirmation statements, are completed accurately and submitted in the correct format. Pay close attention to the electronic submission requirements and communication procedures.

Prevents administrative disqualification.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective provider that unequivocally meets all technical requirements and delivery timelines. Emphasize reliability and a proven track record if applicable, even if not explicitly requested.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (4)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders must submit their bids following the requirements set forth in the tender notice and base documents.
--Bids must be submitted electronically as per the instructions.
--Bidders must use the provided forms for submitting costs for the cell counter and the ultra-low temperature freezer.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific exclusion grounds mentioned, but general compliance with tender documents is implied.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm they have reviewed and fully agree to the tender conditions.
--Bidders must confirm that the offered equipment meets the requirements.
--Bidders must be authorized representatives or have proper power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The ultra-low temperature freezer (-86 °C) must meet specified capacity, temperature, dimensions, storage solutions, cooling reagent, and warranty requirements.
--The offered ultra-low temperature freezer must be accompanied by documentation proving equivalence if not a direct match to standards.
--The desktop automatic cell counter must be capable of determining cell concentration, viability, and morphological parameters based on brightfield image analysis.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The total value of the tender is 19000.0 EUR.
--Bidders must submit cost information for the desktop automatic cell counter and its accessories.
--Bidders must submit cost information for the ultra-low temperature freezer.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307796_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 23.3 KB

The bidder must confirm they have reviewed and fully accept the tender conditions, and that the offered equipment meets the requirements to participate in the procurement process.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307796_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 5.8 KB

The contracting authority, University of Tartu, will evaluate bids for the purchase of an ultra-low temperature freezer and cell counter primarily based on price, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307796_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 73.8 KB

The Procurement Pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but it is not filled out directly but electronically.

Juhised hankemenetluses osalemiseksPDF
Juhised hankemenetluses osalemiseks.pdf -- 127.1 KB

This document outlines the tender's foundational documents, communication procedures, and submission guidelines, serving as a crucial part of bid preparation.

Lisa 1.1 Maksumuse esitamise vormXLS
Lisa 11 Maksumuse esitamise vorm.xlsx -- 19.7 KB

The contracting authority Tartu University wishes to purchase an ultra-low temperature freezer and a cell counter, requiring the submission of a cost submission form where product prices must be filled in.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus - osa 1PDF
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus - osa 1.pdf -- 230.6 KB

Bidders must submit a proposal for an ultra-low temperature freezer (-86 °C) that precisely meets the technical specifications regarding capacity, temperature, dimensions, storage solutions, refrigerant, and warranty, providing proof of equivalence if offering alternative products.

Lisa 2.1 Maksumuse esitamise vormXLS
Lisa 21 Maksumuse esitamise vorm.xlsx -- 19.6 KB

This document is a form for submitting the cost of a benchtop automatic cell counter kit and its accessories, requiring fields for product, quantity, and unit price to be filled in.

Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldus - osa 2PDF
Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldus - osa 2.pdf -- 213.4 KB

Tartu University is seeking a benchtop automatic cell counter capable of determining cell concentration, viability, and morphological parameters based on bright-field image analysis, requiring autonomous operation with an integrated screen and software.

Lisa 3 - 4 (vormid)DOC
Lisa 3 - 4 (vormid).docx -- 30.8 KB

This document contains power of attorney forms required to authorize bidder representatives and designate joint bidder representatives for the University of Tartu tender.

Lisa 5 Hankelepingu kavandPDF
Lisa 5 Hankelepingu kavand.pdf -- 262.4 KB

This document is a draft contract for the University of Tartu's public procurement 'Purchase of Ultra-freezer and Cell Counter', outlining equipment technical specifications, price, payment terms, and delivery deadlines.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek - nõuded pakkujale ja pakkumusele (30)PDF
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek - nõuded pakkuj... -- 192.9 KB

The University of Tartu invites bidders to submit offers for the purchase of an ultra-low freezer and cell counter, following the requirements set forth in the tender notice and base documents.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an ultra-low temperature freezer and cell counter is generally well-structured with clear technical specifications and electronic submission. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on contract duration, impacting completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal requirements, including proper CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable. The absence of explicit dispute information and the presence of a clear procedure contribute positively. However, the lack of explicit contract duration information is a minor oversight.

Clarity80/100

The technical descriptions for both the ultra-low temperature freezer and the cell counter are clear and specific. The conditions for participation and the requirement for 'or equivalent' are well-articulated. The division into lots is also clear.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value and deadlines. However, the contract duration is not explicitly stated, and while the tender is divided into parts, the specific duration for each part is not detailed. The financing information is also not explicitly provided.

Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The value is disclosed, and the criteria for equivalence ('or equivalent') are stated, which is good. The primary evaluation criterion being price (lowest price gets maximum points) is objective, though a more nuanced approach could be considered. No specific company tailoring is apparent.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are facilitated. The contract start date is implied by the delivery deadline (4 months after contract signing), but not explicitly stated. Financing information is not detailed. The lack of explicit contract duration impacts practicality.

Contract start date not explicitly stated
Financing information not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There is no indication of suspension or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent within the provided information.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear technical specifications for equipment
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled
Division into lots for flexibility
Requirement for 'or equivalent' promotes wider participation

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration information
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Clearly state the evaluation criteria beyond just price.
2. Specify the contract duration.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects where applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline