Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login18 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
11 documents available with AI summaries
The bidder must confirm they have reviewed and fully accept the tender conditions, and that the offered equipment meets the requirements to participate in the procurement process.
The contracting authority, University of Tartu, will evaluate bids for the purchase of an ultra-low temperature freezer and cell counter primarily based on price, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.
The Procurement Pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but it is not filled out directly but electronically.
This document outlines the tender's foundational documents, communication procedures, and submission guidelines, serving as a crucial part of bid preparation.
The contracting authority Tartu University wishes to purchase an ultra-low temperature freezer and a cell counter, requiring the submission of a cost submission form where product prices must be filled in.
Bidders must submit a proposal for an ultra-low temperature freezer (-86 °C) that precisely meets the technical specifications regarding capacity, temperature, dimensions, storage solutions, refrigerant, and warranty, providing proof of equivalence if offering alternative products.
This document is a form for submitting the cost of a benchtop automatic cell counter kit and its accessories, requiring fields for product, quantity, and unit price to be filled in.
Tartu University is seeking a benchtop automatic cell counter capable of determining cell concentration, viability, and morphological parameters based on bright-field image analysis, requiring autonomous operation with an integrated screen and software.
This document contains power of attorney forms required to authorize bidder representatives and designate joint bidder representatives for the University of Tartu tender.
This document is a draft contract for the University of Tartu's public procurement 'Purchase of Ultra-freezer and Cell Counter', outlining equipment technical specifications, price, payment terms, and delivery deadlines.
The University of Tartu invites bidders to submit offers for the purchase of an ultra-low freezer and cell counter, following the requirements set forth in the tender notice and base documents.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for an ultra-low temperature freezer and cell counter is generally well-structured with clear technical specifications and electronic submission. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on contract duration, impacting completeness and practicality.
The tender adheres to general legal requirements, including proper CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable. The absence of explicit dispute information and the presence of a clear procedure contribute positively. However, the lack of explicit contract duration information is a minor oversight.
The technical descriptions for both the ultra-low temperature freezer and the cell counter are clear and specific. The conditions for participation and the requirement for 'or equivalent' are well-articulated. The division into lots is also clear.
Most basic information is present, including estimated value and deadlines. However, the contract duration is not explicitly stated, and while the tender is divided into parts, the specific duration for each part is not detailed. The financing information is also not explicitly provided.
The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The value is disclosed, and the criteria for equivalence ('or equivalent') are stated, which is good. The primary evaluation criterion being price (lowest price gets maximum points) is objective, though a more nuanced approach could be considered. No specific company tailoring is apparent.
E-submission and e-procurement are facilitated. The contract start date is implied by the delivery deadline (4 months after contract signing), but not explicitly stated. Financing information is not detailed. The lack of explicit contract duration impacts practicality.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There is no indication of suspension or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent within the provided information.
The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required