Skip to main content
Tenders

Design and construction of street lighting for Meegomäe-Kubija sports base

Open
Deadline
12 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307776
Value
€24,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 18, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of design and construction work100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Tender Opening

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€24,000
Duration
9 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the public procurement is the establishment of street lighting in accordance with the technical specification (TK) and additional tender documents. Design and construction of street lighting for the access road to the Kubija sports base in Meegomäe village, in accordance with TK Annex 1 site plan.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-08 09:00:00.
--A work schedule must be submitted, prepared according to provided instructions and adapted as necessary (Hankelepingu Lisa 2 - Tööde Ajakava vorm.xlsx).
--The tender document (HD) includes instructions for preparing the bid.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must confirm their compliance with the conditions set forth in the tender documents.
--Bidders must be able to provide equivalent alternatives for any specified brands, patents, types, origins, or manufacturing methods as per Section 88, Paragraph 2 of the Public Procurement Act.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be capable of undertaking the design and construction of street lighting for the Meegomäe-Kubija sports base.
--Technical specifications (TK Lisa 1) are a crucial part of the bid.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The total value of the tender is 24,000.0 EUR.
--The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--Requirements for presenting the cost are detailed in the document "vastavustingimused.pdf".

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307776_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 4.3 KB

This document clarifies conditions for joint tenders, subcontractor engagement, and bid submission, including requirements for cost presentation, for potential bidders.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307776_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307776_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 33.6 KB

The procurement passport (Hankepass) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

Hankedokument (HD)DOC
Hankedokument_pakkumuskutse(HD)_Meegomae-Kubi... -- 36.5 KB

The tender document (HD) includes an invitation to submit a bid for the design and construction of street lighting at Meegomäe-Kubija sports base, instructions for bid preparation, and a small tender reference number.

Lepingu lisa - Tööde Ajakava vormXLS
Hankelepingu Lisa 2 - Tööde Ajakava vorm.xlsx -- 11.7 KB

The contracting authority requires the submission of a work schedule, which must be prepared according to the provided instructions and adapted as needed.

Lisa 3 Hankelepingu projektDOC
Hankelepingu projekt - Meegomäe-Kubija spordi... -- 41.6 KB

This document is a draft main contractor agreement outlining the terms and obligations for the design and construction of street lighting for the Meegomäe-Kubija sports base.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus (TK)DOC
Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus (TK)_Meegomäe-Kubi... -- 26.0 KB

The tender seeks proposals for the design and construction of street lighting at the Meegomäe-Kubija sports base, with the technical specification being a crucial part of the bid preparation.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for street lighting design and construction is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a single, objective evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some administrative information is difficult to assess without full document access.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including clear CPV coding and a defined procedure. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are noted. The inclusion of 'or equivalent' for specified items and references to legal acts suggests regulatory awareness.

Clarity80/100

The description of the scope (street lighting design and construction) is clear. Technical specifications are referenced as essential. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is explicitly stated. Conditions for participation and bid preparation are detailed in referenced documents.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information like title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. Contract duration and tender validity are specified. However, the full extent of attached documents and their content is not entirely clear from the AI extraction, impacting the assessment of completeness regarding all essential documents.

Fairness85/100

The tender specifies 'e-submission' and 'e-procurement', promoting accessibility. The primary evaluation criterion is the bid price, which is objective. The use of 'or equivalent' for specified items ensures fairness. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are noted. A contract duration is given. However, the contract start date and financing information are not explicitly detailed in the provided extract, limiting the assessment of practical implementation for bidders. The reliance on external PDF/XLS/PNG documents for critical information also reduces immediate practicality.

Missing contract start date.
Financing information not explicitly detailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no flags for suspension or disputes. Dates are logically presented and consistent with a standard procurement timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded, which often mandates sustainability criteria. This aspect is therefore not a focus of the procurement.

No explicit mention of green procurement criteria.
No explicit mention of social aspects.

Strengths

Clear technical specifications and scope.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Use of 'or equivalent' for specified items.
E-submission and e-procurement methods.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria.
Limited information on contract start date and financing.
Reliance on non-AI-analyzable document formats for crucial details.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria to align with modern procurement best practices.
2. Clearly state the contract start date and provide details on financing mechanisms within the tender documentation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline