Skip to main content
Tenders

Conservation of the ring wall of Põltsamaa Castle

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307769
Value
€40,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Offer price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Tender Opening

April 09, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€40,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Conservation of parts of the ring wall of Põltsamaa Castle (conservation of west corner fragments, southeast, southwest wall and northeast wall section).
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

22 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (13)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (4)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS13
--Submit a price offer using the provided form ('Pakkumuse mahutabel.xlsx').
--The bid must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-09 07:00:00.
--Joint offers are permitted.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated, but general exclusion grounds may apply based on legal frameworks.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must be a legal entity capable of entering into contracts.
--Must not be subject to exclusion grounds.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Experience in conservation works of historical buildings/structures.
--Ability to execute restoration works according to the provided plan and technical specifications.
--Knowledge and application of appropriate conservation methods and materials.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Ability to finance the project.
--Bidders must submit a price offer.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307769_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 4.3 KB

This document outlines compliance conditions regarding joint bids, subcontractor engagement rules, bid submission terms and format, and cost submission requirements for the Põltsamaa Castle ring wall conservation tender.

Pakkumuse esitamise vormXLS
Pakkumuse mahutabel.xlsx -- 10.6 KB

Bidders must submit a price offer for the conservation work of the Põltsamaa Castle ring wall by completing the provided form.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307769_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307769_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 38.0 KB

The tender pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as initial evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats.

TEGEVUSKAVA RINGMÜÜRI VARISEMISE OHTLIKE PIIRKONDADE AVARIILISE OLUKORRA LIKVIDE...PDF
Restaureerimise tööde kava, Põltsamaa loss-li... -- 3.5 MB

The action plan for liquidating the emergency situation of the Põltsamaa Castle's curtain wall describes the object's condition, the purpose of the work, methodology, and materials to ensure visitor safety and preserve the heritage structure.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 4.2 MB

The technical specification defines the technical requirements, standards, and quality requirements for the conservation works of the Põltsamaa Castle ring wall, which construction companies must adhere to.

Töövõtulepingu projektDOC
Töövõtulepingu projekt.doc -- 113.5 KB

The draft contract for the conservation of the Põltsamaa castle's ring wall outlines the contract terms and legal framework.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the conservation of Põltsamaa Castle's curtain wall is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation based on the lowest price. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve on the accessibility of certain required documents.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal frameworks for public procurement. Deadlines are reasonable, and the procedure is outlined. The CPV code is provided, and there are no reported disputes. The use of ESPD and Hankepass aligns with standard practices.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and technical specifications are provided. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is explicitly stated. However, the exact format and accessibility of the 'ESPD_v2.0_laiendatud.xml' for AI analysis is unclear, and the 'Vastavustingimused.pdf' and 'Töövõtulepingu projekt.doc' are not summarized, leaving some conditions less transparent.

Lack of summary for 'Vastavustingimused.pdf' and 'Töövõtulepingu projekt.doc'.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the 'ESPD_v2.0_laiendatud.xml' is not fully analyzed, and the summaries for 'Vastavustingimused.pdf' and 'Töövõtulepingu projekt.doc' are missing, which could impact a bidder's full understanding of all requirements.

Incomplete AI analysis of 'ESPD_v2.0_laiendatud.xml'.
Missing summaries for 'Vastavustingimused.pdf' and 'Töövõtulepingu projekt.doc'.
Fairness85/100

The tender is fair, with full document access (except for the AI-analyzed XML). The estimated value is disclosed, deadlines are reasonable, and the evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective. E-procurement is utilized, and joint offers are permitted, promoting broader participation.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a document URL is implied through the tender platform. The contract start date is specified. However, the financing information is not detailed, and the duration is presented as 'PERIOD' without a specific number of months for the contract itself, only for tender validity.

Lack of specific financing details.
Contract duration not explicitly stated in months/years.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening, Contract Start) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded. This area is underdeveloped.

No explicit mention of green procurement.
No explicit mention of social aspects.

Strengths

Clear technical specifications and description of works.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Use of e-procurement and Hankepass for initial proof.
Reasonable deadlines and logical date sequencing.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Incomplete AI analysis of ESPD XML and missing summaries for key documents.
Limited detail on financing and contract duration.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., use of eco-friendly materials, waste management plans).
2. Provide full summaries for all essential documents and ensure all required file formats are fully analyzable.
3. Clarify financing sources and the exact contract duration.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline