Skip to main content
Tenders

Procurement of furniture for Abja Gymnasium

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307740
Value
€113,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 18, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost, lowest is best100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 01, 2026

Tender Opening

April 01, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 15, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€113,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€72,774
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
93%
884 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the public procurement is to acquire high-quality, durable, and ergonomic furniture for the reconstructed building of Abja Gymnasium, which supports modern learning concepts, fits into the architectural integrity of the building, allows for flexible use of spaces, and ensures user-friendliness and reasonable lifecycle costs. The procurement covers the acquisition of furniture for the entire building, with furniture groups defined by priority, based on the need to ensure the school's core functions and the building's commissioning schedule.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (4)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-01 06:00:00.
--The tender is not divided into lots to ensure a functionally and visually cohesive solution and avoid coordination risks and delays.
--Bidders must adhere to the principles of business secrecy, submission conditions, and cost presentation as outlined in the 'Vastavustingimused' document.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific exclusion grounds mentioned, but general procurement law applies.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit a 'Hankepass' (self-declaration) as initial proof instead of certificates from authorities or third parties.
--Bidders must confirm compliance with tender conditions.
--Bidders must provide company data.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must provide descriptions, quantities, and links for specific furniture items (tables, chairs, etc.) as per the priority table.
--Furniture must form a functionally and visually cohesive solution that fits the reconstructed building's spatial solution and interior design.
--Furniture items must be compatible with each other, possess a uniform quality level, and be technically coordinated.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the tender is 113,000.0 EUR.
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on price, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307740_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the conditions for checking subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on grounds for exclusion related to criminal proceedings and human trafficking.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307740_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.1 KB

The tender document "Compliance Conditions" clarifies the submission of joint offers, marking of trade secrets, offer submission terms, cost presentation, and principles of equivalence, which are necessary for successful bid submission.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307740_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority primarily evaluates bids based on price, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307740_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.1 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as initial evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats.

Lähteülesanne ja tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lähteülesanne ja tehniline kirjeldus - Abja G... -- 33.7 KB

The contracting authority is seeking bids for the supply, installation, and disposal of furniture for Abja Gymnasium, adhering to the provided technical specifications and standards.

Vorm 1 - Ühise pakkumuse volikiriDOC
Vorm 1 – Ühise pakkumuse volikiri.docx -- 14.2 KB

This power of attorney is required when bidders submit a joint bid to designate a single representative.

Vorm 2 - Hankes osalemise taotluse vormDOC
Vorm 2 - Hankes osalemise taotluse vorm.docx -- 17.2 KB

This form is an application to participate in the tender, where the bidder confirms compliance with tender conditions and provides their company details.

Vorm 3 - Abja Gümnaaiumi sisustuse tabel prioriteetsuse järgiXLS
Vorm 3 - Abja Gümnaasiumi sisustuse tabel pri... -- 5.4 MB

The procurement of Abja Gymnasium furniture requires bidders to provide descriptions, quantities, and links for specific furniture items like tables and chairs, with a priority table outlining the requirements.

Vorm 4 - Hankelepingu projektDOC
Vorm 4 - Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 18.0 KB

The draft contract outlines the terms for the supply of Abja Gymnasium's furnishings, defining the rights and obligations of the parties involved.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for school furniture procurement is well-structured with clear technical requirements and a defined evaluation process. While generally fair and legally compliant, its practicality could be improved with more detailed financing information and a stronger sustainability focus.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement law, uses a proper CPV code, and has reasonable deadlines and a clear procedure. No disputes are indicated. The reliance on self-declaration ('Hankepass') is a standard, legally accepted practice in EU procurement. The 'Vastavustingimused' document ensures adherence to legal submission terms.

Clarity80/100

The description clearly outlines the objective of procuring quality, durable, and ergonomic furniture that supports modern pedagogy and fits the building's design. Specific requirements for furniture compatibility and cohesive solutions are well-documented. The 'Lähteülesanne ja tehniline kirjeldus' and the priority table provide detailed technical guidance.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration (tender valid for 3 months), and contract start date. However, the financing details are not explicitly stated beyond the estimated value, and while several essential documents are attached or referenced, some technical details are in formats not readable by AI.

Fairness85/100

The tender is fair with full document access and disclosed value. The evaluation is primarily based on price, which is clearly stated, and the criteria use relative weighting. E-submission and e-procurement are mandated, promoting accessibility. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are well-supported. A clear contract start date is provided. However, detailed financing information beyond the estimated value is missing, which can impact bidder planning. The duration is specified as 'PERIOD' with a 'Tender Valid' of 3 months, which is standard but could be more specific if contract duration differed.

Lack of detailed financing information beyond estimated value.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and CPV code are all populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logical, with a reasonable gap between submission and opening. The contract start date follows the tender validity period.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'mõistlikud elukaarekulud' (reasonable lifecycle costs) which hints at sustainability, but explicit green procurement criteria or social aspects are not detailed. Innovation is not a prominent focus. The 'EU Funded' characteristic is noted, but specific sustainability targets are absent.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social procurement aspects.

Strengths

Clear technical and functional requirements.
Objective evaluation criteria (primarily price-based).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Well-defined legal and submission procedures.

Concerns

Limited information on financing beyond the estimated value.
Lack of explicit sustainability and social impact criteria.
Some technical documents are in unreadable formats for AI analysis.

Recommendations

1. Provide more granular financial details regarding payment schedules and potential financing options.
2. Integrate specific green and social procurement criteria into the evaluation or technical specifications.
3. Ensure all technical documents are provided in universally accessible formats.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline