Skip to main content
Tenders

Augmentations for hip joint deformities replacement

Open
Deadline
25 days left
April 21, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307722
Value
€260,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Mark the total cost of the implant for restoring one volume.100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 14, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 21, 2026

Tender Opening

April 21, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 17, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€260,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€92,792
Avg. Bids
2.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
3,220 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of this procurement is to conclude a framework agreement for the purchase of augmentations necessary for the replacement of hip joint deformities, with the provision of instruments for the installation of the augmentations or until the maximum cost is reached, whichever occurs first.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender is not divided into lots because it concerns functionally interacting products of different shapes and sizes.
--Bidders must submit a tender for the procurement of augmentations and instruments necessary for the replacement of hip joint deformities, explaining the purpose of the tender, technical requirements, and conditions for submitting a bid.
--The framework agreement regulates the sale of augmentations necessary for the replacement of hip joint deformities between Tartu University Hospital and the supplier, defining the terms of the agreement, product requirements, and the obligations of the parties.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders shall not involve subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit an application to participate in the procurement procedure according to the provided Form II, entering their company data.
--Joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.
--The "Hankepass" (procurement pass) is an initial confirmation of the company itself, necessary for participation in the procurement procedure, and contains conditions set by the contracting authority.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit a tender that complies with the technical specifications, including implants, components, and instruments for the replacement of hip joint deformities, according to the detailed requirements provided in Annex 1.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307722_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 13.8 KB

The bidder must confirm that subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation will not be involved in the contract execution, and joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.

Pakkuja esitab tehnilistele tingimustele vastava pakkumuse vastavalt Lisale 1 Wo...DOC
Lisa_1_tehnilised_tingimused.docx -- 18.9 KB

Bidders must submit a bid compliant with the technical specifications, including implants, components, and instruments for hip joint deformity replacement as per the detailed requirements in Appendix 1.

Pakkuja esitab hankemenetluses osalemise avalduse vastavalt Lisa 3 vormile IIDOC
Lisa_3_vorm_II.docx -- 31.7 KB

The bidder must submit an application to participate in the procurement procedure according to the provided Form II, entering their company details.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307722_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307722_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 66.7 KB

The Tender Pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, required for participation in the procurement procedure, and includes conditions set by the contracting authority.

Juhised pakkujalePDF
Juhised pakkujale.pdf -- 189.8 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders participating in the procurement of augmentations for hip socket deformities, clarifying the tender's objective, technical requirements, and submission conditions.

Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Lisa_3_vorm_I.docx -- 31.8 KB

A joint bidder authorization is a document that empowers one joint bidder to represent the others in the procurement procedure.

RaamlepingPDF
Raamleping.pdf -- 195.7 KB

This framework agreement governs the sale of augmentations for hip joint deformities between Tartu University Hospital and the supplier, outlining contract terms, product requirements, and party obligations.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for hip joint deformity augmentations is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has some minor practical limitations regarding document accessibility.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are noted. The procedure type 'A' is standard.

Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement's objective is clear, and technical requirements are detailed in Annex 1. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is explicitly stated. Conditions for participation are documented.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the specific financing source is not explicitly detailed, and the 'Hankepass' in international format (ESPD) is not AI-analyzable, potentially hindering full document completeness assessment.

Fairness85/100

The tender is open to e-submission and e-procurement, promoting fairness. The evaluation criterion is objective (lowest price). The exclusion of bidders connected to the Russian Federation is a specific requirement, but not necessarily unfair if justified by geopolitical context. The 'Max Participants: 1' is unusual and could be a point of concern if it implies a pre-selected supplier, though it might refer to the number of framework agreements.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. The contract start date is specified. However, the URL for the opening place is provided, but direct links to all required documents within the tender notice itself are not immediately apparent, requiring navigation through the e-procurement portal. The financing information is not detailed.

Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The timeline is consistent.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU-funded, which often encourages sustainability criteria.

Strengths

Clear technical specifications in Annex 1
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price)
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Well-defined basic tender information

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria
Ambiguity regarding 'Max Participants: 1'
Potential difficulty in accessing all required documents directly

Recommendations

1. Clarify the 'Max Participants: 1' criterion.
2. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria into future tenders.
3. Ensure direct links to all essential tender documents are provided within the notice.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline