Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login12 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
7 documents available with AI summaries
Bidders must confirm they have familiarized themselves with the contract performance site, submit the bid according to the tender document conditions and structure, and clarify equivalency if necessary.
The contracting authority evaluates bids solely based on the total cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.
The procurement passport (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and expected response format.
This document provides instructions for bidders participating in the tender for the design works of Kärla Primary School building, clarifying tender conditions and requirements.
This technical specification details the technical requirements, timeline, and foundational documents for the Kärla Primary School building design works, which the contractor must consider when preparing their bid.
This document is a draft tender contract for design works, defining the parties, subject, documents, and general terms for the design of the Kärla Primary School building.
This document is a joint bidder's power of attorney, authorizing one bidder to represent others in the public procurement and confirming joint and several liability for contract performance.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for architectural and engineering design services for Kärla Primary School is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a reasonable timeline. Key documents are provided, and the evaluation is based on cost. However, it lacks explicit sustainability criteria and detailed technical capability requirements.
The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The procedure type 'A' (Open procedure) is standard. No disputes or suspensions are noted. The mention of 'or equivalent' for standards is a good practice for regulatory compliance.
The description of the project is clear, specifying the location and the stage of design (main project). Key documents like 'Instructions for Bidders' and 'Technical Specification' are referenced. The evaluation criteria are stated as relative weighting, with cost being the sole factor.
Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, specific details on technical capability requirements and financial requirements are not explicitly detailed in the provided text, relying on bidders to refer to attached documents.
The tender allows for 'or equivalent' for standards, promoting fairness. The evaluation is based on cost, which is objective. E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.
E-submission is mandated. A contract start date is not explicitly stated, but the duration is clear. Financing information is not detailed. The site visit dates are provided, which aids practicality for bidders.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no noted suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.
The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area has significant room for improvement.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required