Skip to main content
Tenders

Analysis of the Socio-Economic Impact of Extended Producer Responsibility for the Removal of Micropollutants from Wastewater (Ministry of Climate)

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
307689
Value
€40,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Service description60%
Cost of the bid40%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Tender Opening

April 09, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€40,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The updated Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive, which entered into force on January 1, 2025, requires Member States to remove micropollutants from medicines and cosmetics in certain wastewater treatment plants. To achieve this goal, the directive provides for the implementation of a fourth treatment stage and the development of an Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system for its financing. The results of this analysis should clarify the actual socio-economic impact of EPR requirements on the pharmaceutical and cosmetic sectors' market in Estonia, including product prices and market stability.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

24 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (15)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS15
--Bids will be evaluated based on cost (40%) and service description (60%).
--The lowest cost and the best service description will receive the highest points.
--The tender is not divided into lots; a service contract will be concluded with one bidder.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The bidder must be qualified to provide the service.
--The bidder must be able to provide a power of attorney for joint bidders if applicable.
--The bidder must be able to mark business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must provide detailed information on the proposed team members, including their education and work experience.
--The bidder must be able to conduct an analysis to assess the socio-economic impact of implementing extended producer responsibility for the removal of micro-pollutants from wastewater.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender value is 40,000.0 EUR.
--The bidder's cost will be weighted at 40% in the evaluation.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307689_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 13.4 KB

This document outlines compliance conditions regarding joint bidder authorization, business secret marking, bid submission, and cost, confirming acceptance of tender document terms.

Meeskonnaliikmete andmed hankija etteantud vormilDOC
Andmed meeskonnaliikmete kohta.docx -- 36.3 KB

The bidder must submit detailed information about the proposed team members, including their education and work experience, for the contracting authority to assess their compliance with requirements.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307689_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.3 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids based on both cost (40%) and service description (60%), with the lowest cost and best service description receiving the highest scores.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307689_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 65.6 KB

The Procurement Pass (Hankepass) is an initial declaration of the bidder's qualification, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats, but is not intended for completion.

HindamismetoodikaDOC
Hindamismetoodika_mõjud.docx -- 44.4 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation methodology, where economic advantage and service description are the primary criteria for selecting the winning bidder.

Lisateave pakkumuse koostamiseksDOC
Lisateave pakkumuse koostamiseks.docx -- 34.9 KB

This document clarifies tender procedure details, including non-division of the contract, joint submissions, bid confidentiality, submission requirements, and grounds for tender cancellation.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline_kirjeldus_mõjud.docx -- 47.9 KB

The tender seeks analytical services to assess the socio-economic impact of implementing extended producer responsibility for removing micropollutants from wastewater, based on the technical specification.

TöövõtulepingDOC
Töövõtuleping.docx -- 49.7 KB

The work contract defines the terms, scope of work, and integral parts of the contract for the public procurement "Socio-economic impact analysis of extended producer responsibility for the removal of micro-pollutants from wastewater".

Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 23.2 KB

This power of attorney authorizes one joint bidder to represent other joint bidders in the tender procedure and contract conclusion.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a socio-economic impact analysis of extended producer responsibility is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and evaluation criteria. However, it lacks explicit details on mandatory exclusion grounds and some sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements for public procurement, including a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission period. No disputes are indicated. The procedure code 'A' suggests an open procedure, which is generally compliant.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service required is clear, stemming from a new EU directive. Requirements for team members and the analysis itself are documented. Evaluation criteria are specified, although the weighting is provided in the AI-extracted requirements rather than a dedicated document summary.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. Key documents like the technical specification, contract template, and team member data form are indicated as required. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided summaries could be a minor gap.

Fairness85/100

The tender is accessible electronically, and the value is disclosed. The evaluation criteria are objective and based on relative weighting. The decision to award to a single bidder is justified by the contracting authority for efficiency, which is a reasonable approach. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are confirmed. The contract start date is specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the duration is defined as 'PERIOD' which is standard. The reliance on specific document formats for ESPD might pose a minor challenge if not universally compatible.

Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided for reveal, submission, and opening are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is positive. However, there are no specific details on social aspects, innovation, or whether the tender is EU funded, limiting the score in this category.

Strengths

Clear description of the analytical task linked to EU directive
Objective evaluation criteria with clear weighting
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled
Justification for single-bidder contract award

Concerns

Lack of explicit details on mandatory exclusion grounds
Limited information on social aspects and innovation in sustainability
Potential compatibility issues with ESPD XML format

Recommendations

1. Clarify mandatory exclusion grounds in tender documents.
2. Provide more specific details on social and innovation aspects within the 'Green Procurement' characteristic.
3. Ensure compatibility of ESPD format or provide alternative methods for data import.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline