Skip to main content
Tenders

Disposable paper pulp kidney dishes

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307686
Value
€140,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 17, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 03, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€140,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€92,792
Avg. Bids
2.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
3,220 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to conclude a framework agreement for the purchase of disposable paper pulp kidney dishes. Product descriptions are provided in Annex 1. The framework agreement will be concluded for three years from the date of signing the agreement or until the maximum cost is reached, whichever condition occurs first.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (8)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (4)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--The tender is not divided into lots as it is a whole that cannot be divided.
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-06 08:00:00.
--The "hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf" document provides initial confirmation of the bidder's self-declaration and the format of expected responses, but is not a document to be filled out.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm their eligibility based on conditions outlined in the "vastavustingimused.pdf" document.
--If submitting as a joint offer, a power of attorney for joint bidders (form I) is required.
--Bidders must submit an application for participation in the procurement procedure using the provided form II.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit a bid that complies with the technical specifications.
--The bid must be submitted in Excel format (Lisa 1).
--The bid must include unit prices and total cost.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--Cost submission requirements are detailed in "vastavustingimused.pdf".

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307686_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.1 KB

This document outlines requirements for joint bidder authorization, business secret declarations, bid submission conditions, and cost presentation, which are necessary for tender application.

Pakkuja esitab tehnilistele tingimustele vastava pakkumuse Lisa 1, koos ühikuhin...XLS
Lisa_1.xlsx -- 11.3 KB

The bidder must submit a bid compliant with technical specifications in Excel format as Annex 1, including unit price and total cost.

Pakkuja esitab hankemenetluses osalemise avalduse vastavalt Lisa 3 vormile II.DOC
Lisa_3_vorm_II.docx -- 31.5 KB

The bidder must submit an application to participate in the procurement procedure according to the provided Form II, entering their details.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307686_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307686_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 66.9 KB

The procurement passport is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not a document intended for completion itself.

Juhised pakkujalePDF
Juhised pakkujale.pdf -- 193.0 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders participating in the public procurement of disposable paper pulp kidney dishes, clarifying procedural rules and requirements.

RaamlepingPDF
Lisa_2_Raamleping.pdf -- 191.0 KB

This framework agreement outlines the terms for the sale of disposable paper pulp kidney dishes by Tartu University Hospital and Põlva Hospital, including product requirements, delivery conditions, and sustainability principles.

Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Lisa_3_vorm_I.docx -- 31.7 KB

This document is a joint bidder authorization letter, required when multiple companies submit a bid together to designate an authorized representative.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for disposable paper pulp kidney dishes is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable process. Key areas for improvement include more explicit sustainability criteria and clearer guidance on the ESPD usage.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The framework agreement structure is standard. No immediate legal red flags were detected.

Clarity80/100

The tender's objective and product description are clear, with specific annexes detailing technical requirements and submission formats. The role of the 'Hankepass' documents is explained, enhancing clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the specific content of 'vastavustingimused.pdf' and 'Juhised pakkujale.pdf' is not fully detailed, and the ESPD's practical application for bidders could be clearer.

Fairness85/100

The tender is open to e-submission and uses objective evaluation criteria (lowest price). The maximum number of participants (2) for a framework agreement might be restrictive, but it's not explicitly tailored to specific companies. Full document access is implied.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, which is practical. However, the reliance on multiple PDF and DOCX documents for requirements and submission forms, alongside an Excel format for the bid itself, could be streamlined. The ESPD's XML format is not directly usable by AI analysis, suggesting potential user interface challenges.

Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no indications of suspension or disputes.

Sustainability50/100

While the framework agreement mentions 'principles of sustainable development,' specific green procurement criteria or social aspects are not detailed. The tender is not explicitly EU-funded.

Lack of specific green procurement criteria
Absence of detailed social aspects

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Well-defined CPV code
Mandatory e-submission
Objective evaluation criteria (lowest price)

Concerns

Limited detail on sustainability and social aspects
Potential complexity in managing multiple document formats for submission
Unclear practical application of ESPD for bidders

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific, measurable green procurement criteria.
2. Provide a consolidated guide for bidders on all required documents and formats.
3. Clarify the mandatory use and integration of the ESPD in the submission process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline