Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Mõisavahe Circular Economy Station Design Works

Open
Deadline
25 days left
April 29, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
307684
Value
€225,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 27, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid cost excluding VAT100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 22, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 29, 2026

Tender Opening

April 29, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€225,000
Duration
7 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the procurement contract is design works - a circular economy building with associated infrastructure at Mõisavahe 75/77, Tartu.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

60%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for the Mõisavahe circular economy station design works requires a strong focus on compliance and clear documentation. While technical and financial requirements are not explicitly detailed, bidders must meticulously address exclusion grounds, eligibility, and submission formats. Differentiation will stem from demonstrating robust project understanding and a commitment to efficient, high-quality design delivery within the specified timeframe.

Key Winning Messages

Ensuring absolute compliance and risk mitigation through meticulous adherence to all tender documentation.

Demonstrating a clear understanding of circular economy principles and their application in design.

Proposing an efficient and well-managed design process to meet the 7-month duration.

Key Opportunities
The absence of specific technical and financial requirements suggests a focus on compliance and process. Bidders can leverage this by presenting a highly organized and compliant bid.
The explicit mention of 'Lisateave.doc' and 'Hankepass' indicates these documents are crucial. Thorough analysis and integration of their content will be a significant advantage.
The 7-month duration for design works is a defined project scope. Highlighting efficient project management and a clear timeline can be a differentiator.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize the bid for scoring. Bidders must assume a holistic evaluation focusing on compliance and perceived capability.

Focus on demonstrating a thorough understanding of the project, a compliant bid, and a clear, well-structured proposal that addresses all explicit and implicit requirements. Emphasize experience and a proactive approach to design challenges.

The absence of explicit technical requirements means bidders must infer the expected level of detail and expertise. Over- or under-specifying technical solutions could be detrimental.

Carefully review 'Lisateave.doc' and 'Tehniline kirjeldus' (if accessible) for any implicit technical expectations. Focus on a robust, well-reasoned design approach that aligns with circular economy principles and best practices, rather than overly complex or basic solutions.

The mandatory exclusion ground regarding Russian Federation connections requires diligent vetting of all potential subcontractors and suppliers.

Implement a rigorous due diligence process for all third parties involved in the bid. Maintain clear documentation of this vetting process to present if requested.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A design consultancy with proven experience in circular economy infrastructure projects, strong project management capabilities, and a clear understanding of Estonian procurement regulations. The ideal bidder will have a clean compliance record, particularly regarding international sanctions, and the capacity to deliver the design within the 7-month duration.
Key Requirements
Confirmation of no subcontractors or suppliers connected with the Russian Federation.
Adherence to conditions and expected response formats in 'Hankepass'.
Consideration of additional information in 'Lisateave.doc'.
Understanding of contract terms and conditions in 'Hankeleping.docx'.
Power of attorney for joint bidders (if applicable).
Explanation of business secrets (if applicable).
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated understanding of circular economy principles and their practical application in design for waste management facilities.
A meticulously organized and compliant bid that clearly addresses all requirements, especially those in 'Hankepass' and 'Lisateave.doc'.
A clear, efficient project management plan demonstrating the ability to deliver high-quality design within the 7-month timeframe.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider incorporating a commitment to local employment or skills development within the design team, if feasible and aligned with the bidder's capabilities. This can be a subtle differentiator if competitors do not address it.
Bid Focus Areas
Compliance with Exclusion and Eligibility Grounds

Ensure 100% adherence to the 'no Russian Federation connections' rule. Provide clear, documented confirmations. This is a non-negotiable gateway.

Adherence to Submission Requirements and Document Interpretation

Meticulously follow the 'Hankepass' format. Thoroughly analyze and integrate information from 'Lisateave.doc' and 'Hankeleping.docx'. Present information clearly and concisely.

Demonstration of Project Understanding and Capability

Even without explicit technical requirements, articulate a clear understanding of the project's goals (circular economy station) and propose a logical, efficient design approach. Showcase relevant past project experience in a concise manner.

Recommendations5
Rigorous Due Diligence on Russian Federation Connections
CriticalMed effort

Implement a stringent process to verify that no subcontractors, suppliers, or partners involved in the bid have connections to the Russian Federation. Maintain detailed records of this verification.

Prevents mandatory exclusion and ensures eligibility.
Master the 'Hankepass' and 'Lisateave.doc'
CriticalHigh effort

Thoroughly analyze the 'Hankepass' for response formats and the 'Lisateave.doc' for critical project details. Ensure all bid content directly addresses and integrates this information.

Ensures bid compliance and demonstrates attentiveness to tender specifics.
Articulate Circular Economy Design Expertise
HighMed effort

While technical requirements are vague, clearly explain how the proposed design approach embodies circular economy principles relevant to a waste management facility. Highlight efficiency and sustainability in the design process.

Positions the bidder as a knowledgeable and forward-thinking partner.
Develop a Concise Project Management Plan
HighMed effort

Outline a clear, efficient project plan demonstrating how the 7-month design duration will be met. Include key milestones and resource allocation.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver on time.
Address Business Secrets and Joint Bidding Clearly
MediumLow effort

If applicable, prepare a clear explanation of any business secrets. For joint bids, ensure the power of attorney is correctly executed and submitted.

Avoids administrative disqualification or confusion.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most compliant and risk-averse option, emphasizing meticulous attention to detail in meeting all explicit and implicit tender requirements. Highlight the absence of any compliance risks related to international sanctions.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

24 requirements across 10 categories

Submission (10)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (8)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must provide a power of attorney for joint bidders.
--Bidders must explain business secrets if applicable.
--Bidders must adhere to the conditions and expected response formats outlined in the "Hankepass".
ESITAMISE NOUDED5
--Esitama vajadusel ühispakkujate volikirja.
--Selgitama ärisaladust.
--Pakkumuse koostamisel tuleb arvestada "Lisateave.doc" sisuga.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not involve subcontractors or suppliers connected with the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm they do not involve subcontractors or suppliers connected with the Russian Federation.
--Joint bidders must provide a power of attorney.
--Bidders must explain business secrets if applicable.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific technical capability requirements identified in the provided text.]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific financial requirements identified in the provided text.]
KOHUSTUSLIKUD NOUDED1
--Pakkujad ei tohi kaasata alltöövõtjaid ega tarnijaid, kes on seotud Venemaa Föderatsiooniga.
VASTAVUSNOUDED5
--Pakkujad peavad kinnitama, et nad ei kaasata alltöövõtjaid ega tarnijaid, kes on seotud Venemaa Föderatsiooniga.
--Esitama vajadusel ühispakkujate volikirja.
--Selgitama ärisaladust.
TEHNILISED NOUDED1
--[No specific technical requirements identified in the provided text.]
FINANTSNOUDED1
--[No specific financial requirements identified in the provided text.]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307684_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.1 KB

Bidders must confirm they will not engage subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation, and provide a joint bidder authorization and explain trade secrets if applicable.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307684_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document outlines that the bid cost will be evaluated based on the 'lowest is best' principle, with 100% of the scoring allocated to the lowest offered price.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307684_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 65.8 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not intended for completion itself.

HankelepingDOC
Hankeleping.docx -- 35.3 KB

This tender contract template outlines the terms, deadlines, and party obligations for the design work procurement for Tartu city's Mõisavahe circular economy station project.

LisateaveDOC
Lisateave.doc -- 43.0 KB

This document provides additional information for the Mõisavahe circular economy station design works tender, which is important for preparing the bid.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for design works of a circular economy station in Tartu is generally well-structured, with clear evaluation criteria and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks specific details on technical and financial requirements and does not explicitly address sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The inclusion of a mandatory exclusion ground related to the Russian Federation is a specific geopolitical requirement.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, and the evaluation criteria are specified, with a straightforward weighting for price. However, the absence of explicit technical and financial requirements in the provided text could lead to ambiguity for bidders.

Lack of specific technical and financial requirements in the provided text.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the absence of detailed technical and financial requirements within the provided text means that crucial information for bid preparation is likely contained within attached documents, which were not fully analyzed.

Technical and financial requirements are not explicitly detailed in the provided text.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-procurement and electronic submission. The evaluation criterion is objective (lowest price). The exclusion criterion related to the Russian Federation, while specific, is applied universally to all bidders and does not appear to unfairly target specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-submission and e-procurement, which enhances practicality. However, the reliance on external documents like 'Lisateave.doc' and 'Hankeleping.docx' for crucial information, and the lack of explicit financing details, slightly reduce overall practicality.

Reliance on external documents for critical information.
No explicit financing information provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated logically. The dates for reveal, submission, and opening are consistent. No suspensions or disputes are indicated.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as EU funded, which often implies adherence to certain sustainability standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided text, limiting its sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria mentioned.

Strengths

Clear evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Reasonable deadlines and contract duration.
EU funded status.

Concerns

Lack of specific technical and financial requirements in the provided text.
Reliance on external documents for critical bid preparation information.
Absence of explicit sustainability criteria.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all technical and financial requirements are clearly detailed within the tender documents or easily accessible.
2. Consider incorporating explicit sustainability criteria to encourage green and social innovation.
3. Provide direct links or summaries of all essential attached documents within the main tender notice.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline