Skip to main content
Tenders

Purchase of ultrasound device with probes

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307682
Value
€50,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of the device excluding VAT100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€50,000
Duration
14 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€92,792
Avg. Bids
2.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
3,220 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of this procurement is to conclude a procurement contract for the purchase of one new ultrasound device with probes for the Tartu University Hospital Foundation, including a 12-month warranty.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-07 07:00:00.
--The tender is for a complete, indivisible unit (ultrasound device with sensors, installation, setup, and training).
--Bidders must submit a declaration of intent to participate and acceptance of tender conditions.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific exclusion grounds mentioned in the provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm compliance with tender conditions.
--For joint bidders, a power of attorney must be submitted.
--Bidders must declare absence of sanctions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit a detailed technical description of the offered ultrasound device, referencing product information materials.
--The offered device must meet all specified requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender value is 50,000.0 EUR.
--Cost is the primary evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307682_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.7 KB

The contracting authority requires a power of attorney for joint bidders, an application, and confirmation of absence of sanctions to ensure compliance with tender conditions.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus_UH.docx -- 38.0 KB

The bidder must provide a detailed technical specification for the offered ultrasound device, referencing product information materials to prove compliance with all requirements.

Lisa 4 Vorm II AvaldusDOC
Vorm II_Avaldus.docx -- 17.1 KB

This document is a form where the bidder confirms their intention to participate in the tender procedure and agrees to the tender conditions.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307682_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.1 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate ultrasound equipment bids primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307682_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.0 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats.

HD_Juhised pakkujale_UHPDF
HD_Juhised pakkujale_UH.pdf -- 869.8 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders participating in the public procurement for the purchase of an ultrasound device, clarifying the procedure, requirements, and submission conditions.

Lisa 2_Hankelepingu projektPDF
Lisa 2_Hankelepingu projekt.pdf -- 413.9 KB

This document is a draft contract for the purchase of an ultrasound device, outlining the parties, object, price, and annexes that form an integral part of the contract.

Lisa 3_AndmetöötluslepingPDF
Lisa 3_Andmetöötlusleping.pdf -- 430.2 KB

This data processing agreement defines the rights and obligations of the authorized processor regarding the processing of personal data on behalf of the controller for the performance of the procurement contract.

Vorm I_Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Vorm I_Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 13.3 KB

This power of attorney designates a representative for joint bidders, authorized to submit the bid and conclude the contract for the procurement of ultrasound equipment by Tartu University Hospital Foundation.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an ultrasound device is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation process favoring cost. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on a single evaluation criterion.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard procurement regulations, featuring a clear CPV code, defined opening and submission dates, and a reasonable contract duration. The absence of reported disputes or immediate legal flags contributes to a solid score.

Clarity80/100

The description of the ultrasound device purchase is clear, specifying the need for a complete unit and outlining the 12-month warranty. Technical specifications are required, and evaluation criteria, though heavily cost-focused, are documented.

Completeness70/100

Essential information such as the estimated value, contract duration, and a clear title are present. However, detailed financing information beyond the estimated value is not explicitly provided, and some required documents (like the technical specification) are crucial but not fully detailed in the provided summary.

Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, with full document access implied. The primary evaluation criterion being cost with relative weighting is objective. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting a good level of fairness.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, which is practical. However, the contract start date is not specified, which can impact planning. While financing is mentioned as 'classified,' specific details for bidders to assess feasibility are absent.

Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. The absence of suspensions or disputes, coupled with logical sequencing of dates, indicates high data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender does not specify if it is EU-funded, which limits its score in this category.

Lack of sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation)
No indication of EU funding

Strengths

Clear technical requirements
E-procurement and e-submission
Objective cost-based evaluation

Concerns

Lack of sustainability considerations
Absence of contract start date
Heavy reliance on cost as the sole evaluation criterion

Recommendations

1. Incorporate sustainability criteria into the evaluation or technical specifications.
2. Specify the contract start date to aid bidder planning.
3. Consider adding secondary, non-cost-related evaluation criteria to ensure a more balanced selection.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline