Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Repair of pavement on Laste street in Kehra town in 2026

Open
Deadline
15 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307678
Value
€72,900
Location
Estonia
Published
March 25, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total Cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€72,900
Duration
4 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of this procurement is the repair of the pavement on Laste street, connecting Kose mnt and Kooli street, in Kehra town, Anija municipality. The aim is to bring the deteriorated pavement to compliance with requirements and ensure safe traffic. The existing pavement on Laste street is deteriorated, with cracks and potholes, and the curbs of the access roads (driveways) to the plots crossing the sidewalk have crumbled. The trees have grown large, obstructing visibility in traffic, and their roots have broken the pavement.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

60%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for Laste Street sidewalk repair in Kehra town presents a straightforward opportunity focused on price. The key to winning lies in a highly competitive bid price, meticulous adherence to technical specifications, and demonstrating a clear understanding of the scope to minimize potential cost overruns. While social value and innovation are absent, demonstrating efficiency and reliability in execution will be crucial differentiators.

Key Winning Messages

The most cost-effective and reliable solution for Laste Street sidewalk repair.

Guaranteed quality and timely completion of essential local infrastructure improvements.

Key Opportunities
The tender explicitly states that the evaluation will be based solely on the total cost of the bid, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
The absence of social value and innovative aspects simplifies the bid, allowing focus on core technical and financial aspects.
The mention of 'or equivalent' for standards provides flexibility in material selection, potentially allowing for cost savings if equivalent, more affordable materials can be sourced.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the sole evaluation criterion being the lowest bid.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, optimize resource allocation, and explore all avenues for material and labor cost reduction without compromising quality or safety. Leverage efficient project management to minimize time and associated costs.

Potential for unforeseen site conditions (e.g., root damage extent, sub-base issues) not fully detailed in the provided documents, leading to cost overruns.

Conduct a detailed site visit to thoroughly assess the extent of root damage and the condition of the sub-base. Build a contingency into the bid price to account for potential unforeseen issues, clearly outlining what this contingency covers in the bid narrative if possible.

The requirement to not involve subcontractors means the bidder must have all necessary resources and expertise in-house.

Ensure internal capacity and expertise are fully assessed. If there are any gaps, consider if they can be filled through temporary staff or equipment rental rather than subcontracting. Clearly demonstrate this internal capability in the bid.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A small to medium-sized construction company with proven experience in local infrastructure repair, particularly sidewalk and pavement works. They should possess efficient operational capabilities, a strong understanding of local materials and conditions, and the ability to submit a highly competitive, cost-effective bid. Experience with Anija Vallavalitsus or similar municipal projects would be advantageous.
Key Requirements
Compliance with technical description for pavement repair, including preparation, coordination, execution, and environmental safety.
Submission of a price bid for the cost of repair work using the designated form.
Proof of qualification via procurement passport and other indicators.
No involvement of subcontractors.
Adherence to submission conditions and formats.
Justification of business secrets.
Key Discriminators
A demonstrably lowest price bid that is still profitable.
A clear and concise technical proposal that precisely addresses all requirements with a focus on efficiency and durability.
Evidence of past successful completion of similar municipal sidewalk repair projects, highlighting efficiency and client satisfaction.
Social Value Opportunities
While not a mandatory requirement, consider a brief statement in the bid about local employment or sourcing of materials if feasible, to subtly demonstrate community benefit, even if not formally evaluated.
Bid Focus Areas
Total Cost of Bid100%

Submit the absolute lowest possible price that ensures profitability and quality. This requires meticulous cost breakdown, efficient resource planning, and potentially leveraging economies of scale for materials. Analyze the estimated value and aim to bid significantly below it if possible, while ensuring it's still a viable offer.

Recommendations6
Aggressively Price for Lowest Bid
CriticalHigh effort

Given the sole evaluation criterion is lowest price, the primary focus must be on submitting the most competitive bid. Conduct a granular cost analysis, optimize labor and material costs, and build in efficiencies to ensure profitability at the lowest possible price point. Aim to be the lowest bidder by a significant margin if feasible.

Directly maximizes score for the evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Thoroughly Analyze Technical Specifications and Site Conditions
CriticalMed effort

Meticulously review 'Lisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldus' and conduct a detailed site visit to understand the full scope of work, including the extent of root damage and sub-base condition. This will inform accurate costing and prevent unforeseen issues from impacting the bid.

Ensures accurate pricing, minimizes risk of cost overruns, and demonstrates a clear understanding of the project.
Demonstrate In-House Capability
HighMed effort

As subcontractors are prohibited, clearly articulate and provide evidence of the bidder's in-house capacity, equipment, and expertise to undertake all aspects of the repair work. This might involve detailing internal teams, owned machinery, and relevant certifications.

Meets a critical eligibility requirement and builds confidence in the contracting authority.
Highlight Efficiency and Reliability
MediumLow effort

While price is paramount, a concise narrative in the bid can highlight the company's track record for efficient project delivery and reliability in completing similar municipal works on time and to a high standard. This subtly reinforces the value proposition beyond just the lowest price.

Builds trust and confidence in the bidder's ability to execute successfully, even if not formally scored.
Incorporate Contingency for Unforeseen Issues
HighMed effort

Given the potential for root damage and sub-base issues, build a reasonable contingency into the bid price. This should be calculated based on the site visit and experience with similar projects. While not explicitly stated, a well-managed contingency can prevent project failure and reputational damage.

Protects profitability and project success against unexpected site conditions.
Strict Adherence to Submission Format and Deadlines
CriticalLow effort

Ensure all documents are submitted in the correct format, as specified by Anija Vallavalitsus, and well before the deadline of 2026-04-20 06:00:00. Any deviation can lead to disqualification.

Avoids immediate disqualification and ensures the bid is considered.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most straightforward, cost-effective, and reliable solution for a common municipal infrastructure need. Emphasize the ability to deliver the required repairs efficiently and without complications, leveraging in-house capabilities and a deep understanding of local conditions. The core message should be 'maximum value for minimum cost'.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (1)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must comply with the conditions and submission formats specified by the contracting authority.
--The evaluation will be based solely on the total cost of the bid, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--The contracting authority will check the background of subcontractors to ensure their compliance with legal acts and to exclude individuals suspected of fraud or money laundering.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--All references to standards or other bases mentioned in RHS § 88 paragraph 2, § 88 paragraph 5 or § 89 paragraph 2 shall be read as supplemented by the notation "or equivalent".
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must prove their qualification based on the procurement passport and, if necessary, based on the indicators of other persons.
--Bidders must submit a power of attorney for joint bids.
--Bidders must justify business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The technical description specifies the requirements for the repair work of the pavement of the Laste street sidewalk in Kehra town, including preparation, coordination, execution of works, and environmental safety.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender is valued at 72900.0 EUR.
--Bidders must submit a price bid for the cost of the repair work of the Laste street sidewalk in Kehra town, by filling in the designated form.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307678_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 21.0 KB

The contracting authority will verify subcontractors' backgrounds to ensure compliance with legislation and exclude individuals suspected of fraud or money laundering.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307678_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.5 KB

The contracting authority requires bidders to submit a power of attorney for joint bids, justify trade secrets, not involve subcontractors, and ensure the bid complies with conditions and submission formats.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307678_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation process, where the assessment is solely based on the total bid price, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307678_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 66.0 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats.

Alusdokument (hankejuhend pakkujale)PDF
Alusdokument (hankejuhend pakkujale).pdf -- 148.0 KB

Anija Municipality invites bids for the repair of pavement on Laste Street in Kehra, requiring bidders to prove their qualifications through a tender pass and, if necessary, based on the indicators of other entities.

Hanke objektiga tutvumise aktDOC
Hanke objektiga tutvumise akt.doc -- 26.5 KB

The contracting authority invites potential bidders to familiarize themselves with the site of the Kehra town Laste street sidewalk pavement repair tender to ensure a full understanding of the scope of work and requirements.

Lisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 661.1 KB

This technical specification details the requirements for the repair of pavement on Laste Street in Kehra town, including preparation, coordination, execution of works, and environmental safety.

Lisa 2 - Töövõtulepingu projektPDF
Lisa 2 Töövõtulepingu projekt.pdf -- 350.1 KB

This is a draft of the contractor agreement, outlining the terms and obligations for the Kehra town Laste street sidewalk pavement repair tender.

Vorm 1 - Pakkumuse maksumuse esildisXLS
Vorm 1 Pakkumuse maksumuse esildis.xlsx -- 14.5 KB

Bidders must submit a price offer for the cost of sidewalk repair works on Laste Street in Kehra, by completing the designated form.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for sidewalk repair in Kehra town is generally well-structured, with clear technical specifications and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has some minor practical limitations regarding document formats.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including proper CPV classification and a reasonable submission deadline. There are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The reference to 'or equivalent' for standards enhances legal flexibility.

Clarity80/100

The description of the work required is clear, detailing the condition of the sidewalk and the need for repair. Technical specifications are provided, and the evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as the lowest price. The 'or equivalent' clause adds clarity to standard references.

Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like the technical specification and submission form are marked as required. However, the absence of a contract start date and detailed financing conditions beyond 'according to the contract project' could be improved.

Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness by disclosing the estimated value and using a clear, objective evaluation criterion (lowest price). The 'or equivalent' clause ensures a broader range of acceptable solutions. The requirement for e-submission and e-procurement further enhances accessibility.

Practicality65/100

The tender mandates e-submission, which is practical. However, the inclusion of .dwg and .xml file formats for certain documents (Asendiplaan, ESPD v2.0) may pose challenges for bidders if not readily supported by their systems or if specific software is required. The financing condition is vague.

Unsupported document formats for some attachments (.dwg, .xml).
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are consistently populated. The dates provided are logical and do not indicate any conflicts. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, contributing to high data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU-funded, which often implies a higher emphasis on sustainability. This area presents the most significant opportunity for improvement.

Lack of explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Clear technical specifications and scope of work.
Objective and transparent evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Inclusion of 'or equivalent' for standards.

Concerns

Absence of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).
Potential practical issues with unsupported document formats (.dwg, .xml).
Vague financing condition.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., use of recycled materials, waste reduction) into the evaluation.
2. Ensure all attached documents are in widely accessible formats or provide clear instructions/software requirements.
3. Provide more specific details on financing conditions.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline