Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Analysis of the payment system for the implementation of extended producer responsibility for the removal of micropollutants from wastewater (Ministry of Climate)

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
307670
Value
€30,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Service description60%
Bid price40%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Tender Opening

April 09, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€30,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The updated Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive entered into force on January 1, 2025, requiring Member States to remove micropollutants from pharmaceuticals and cosmetic products in certain wastewater treatment plants. To achieve this goal, the directive provides for the implementation of a fourth treatment stage and the development of an Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system for its financing. The purpose of this study is to analyze and propose solutions for designing the payment system, including clarifying how payments will be made from pharmaceutical and cosmetic product manufacturers to producer responsibility organizations and subsequently to water companies for the establishment and maintenance of the fourth treatment stage.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

75%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender requires a detailed analysis of an Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) payment system for micro-pollutant removal in wastewater, driven by a new EU directive. A winning bid will demonstrate deep understanding of the directive's technical requirements, propose a robust and cost-effective payment mechanism, and highlight relevant expertise in environmental policy analysis and financial modeling. Given the high weighting of the service description and the significant cost component, a balanced approach focusing on both quality and price is crucial.

Key Winning Messages

Expertly designed and cost-effective EPR payment system aligned with EU directive for micro-pollutant removal.

Proven analytical capability and deep understanding of environmental policy and financial mechanisms in the water sector.

Key Opportunities
To establish a clear, transparent, and financially sustainable payment system that meets the requirements of the new EU directive.
To leverage expertise in environmental regulation and financial modeling to provide a high-value, technically sound solution.
To differentiate through a highly detailed and practical service description that clearly outlines the methodology and expected outcomes.
Key Challenges
Balancing the high weighting of the service description (60%) with the significant weighting of the bid price (40%).

Develop a high-quality, technically robust service description that clearly articulates value and expertise, while simultaneously ensuring the bid price is competitive and reflects efficient resource allocation. Avoid over-engineering the solution to keep costs down.

Ensuring all technical requirements of the EU directive and the tender's technical specification are comprehensively addressed in the analysis.

Thoroughly deconstruct the EU directive and the technical specification, mapping each requirement to specific deliverables and methodologies within the proposed service description. Engage subject matter experts to validate the technical approach.

Potential for strong competition from established consultancies with existing relationships or deep expertise in the Estonian market.

Focus on clear differentiation through the quality of the proposed methodology, the expertise of the proposed team, and a compelling narrative that highlights unique insights or efficiencies. Emphasize the team's understanding of the specific challenges of implementing this directive in Estonia.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced consultancy firm with a strong track record in environmental policy analysis, regulatory compliance, and financial modeling, particularly within the water sector or EPR schemes. The ideal bidder will possess a team with demonstrated expertise in EU environmental directives, wastewater treatment technologies, and the design of complex payment and funding mechanisms. Prior experience with Estonian or similar EU member state regulatory frameworks would be a significant advantage.
Key Requirements
Analysis of EPR payment system for micro-pollutant removal in wastewater, aligned with EU directive.
Detailed explanation of payment flows from producers to producer responsibility organizations (PROs) and then to water utilities.
Demonstrated understanding of the technical specifications for micro-pollutant removal (fourth treatment stage).
Submission of a comprehensive service description addressing all aspects of the analysis.
Competitive bid price, considering the 40% weighting.
Electronic submission via the specified platform and adherence to all submission conditions.
Proof of qualification and compliance via 'Hankepass' (tender pass).
Detailed information on team members' education and work experience.
Key Discriminators
A novel or particularly efficient approach to structuring the payment flows between producers, PROs, and water utilities.
Demonstrated experience in designing EPR schemes for emerging contaminants or similar complex environmental challenges.
A highly experienced and specialized team with specific knowledge of Estonian environmental regulations and the water sector.
A clear and actionable implementation roadmap for the proposed payment system.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to knowledge sharing by offering to present the findings of the study to relevant stakeholders (e.g., Ministry, water utilities, industry associations) in a public forum or webinar, contributing to broader understanding and capacity building in micro-pollutant removal strategies.
Bid Focus Areas
Service description60.0%

Develop a detailed, structured, and compelling service description that clearly outlines the methodology, analytical approach, deliverables, and timeline. Emphasize the team's expertise, understanding of the EU directive and its implications for Estonia, and how the proposed payment system will be robust, transparent, and cost-effective. Use clear language and visual aids where appropriate to illustrate complex concepts. Highlight the team's experience in similar complex policy and financial analysis projects.

Bid price40.0%

Conduct a thorough cost estimation process, ensuring all direct and indirect costs are accounted for. Optimize resource allocation to deliver the required quality at a competitive price. Benchmark against similar projects if possible. Clearly articulate the value proposition, demonstrating that the proposed price represents excellent value for money given the quality and comprehensiveness of the proposed service.

Recommendations7
Master the EU Directive and Technical Specification
CriticalHigh effort

Thoroughly analyze the updated Asulareovee puhastamise direktiiv and the tender's technical specification. Ensure the proposed analysis directly addresses all requirements, particularly concerning the fourth treatment stage and the specific micro-pollutants targeted.

Ensures compliance and demonstrates technical competence, directly impacting the service description score.
Craft a Superior Service Description
CriticalHigh effort

Develop a detailed, logical, and persuasive service description. Clearly outline the methodology for analyzing payment system design, including data sources, analytical tools, risk assessment, and proposed solutions for payment flows. Showcase the team's expertise and relevant experience.

Directly influences the 60% weighted service description score, providing the primary basis for winning.
Optimize for Price Competitiveness
CriticalMed effort

Conduct a rigorous cost-benefit analysis to ensure the bid price is competitive while reflecting the quality and scope of the proposed service. Clearly justify the proposed costs and demonstrate efficiency.

Crucial for the 40% weighted bid price, directly impacting the overall economic advantage.
Highlight Expertise in EPR and Financial Modeling
HighMed effort

Emphasize the team's specific experience in designing and analyzing Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes, particularly those involving complex financial flows and environmental regulations. Showcase expertise in financial modeling and forecasting for such systems.

Positions the bidder as a specialist, enhancing credibility and the perceived quality of the service description.
Assemble a Strong, Relevant Team
HighMed effort

Ensure the proposed team members have demonstrably relevant education and work experience, as required. Highlight specific expertise in environmental law, wastewater treatment, public finance, and regulatory analysis.

Directly addresses eligibility and technical capability requirements, and strengthens the service description.
Address 'Hankepass' and Submission Requirements Meticulously
MediumLow effort

Complete the 'Hankepass' (tender pass) accurately and electronically. Pay close attention to all submission requirements, including deadlines, format, and any specific instructions regarding joint bids or business secrets.

Prevents disqualification and ensures the bid is considered on its merits.
Incorporate Knowledge Sharing Commitment
MediumLow effort

Propose a commitment to share key findings or insights from the analysis with relevant stakeholders, contributing to broader understanding and capacity building in micro-pollutant removal strategies.

Adds a positive social value dimension, potentially influencing the overall perception of the bid.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as offering the most comprehensive and cost-effective solution by demonstrating a deep understanding of the EU directive's technical and financial implications, coupled with a highly efficient and practical payment system design. Emphasize the team's specialized expertise in EPR and environmental finance, presenting a clear advantage over generalist consultancies. Highlight the clarity and actionable nature of the proposed deliverables.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--The tender is not divided into lots; a service contract will be awarded to a single bidder.
--Bids must be submitted electronically.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-09 07:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must provide initial proof of qualification and compliance with tender conditions electronically via the "Hankepass" (tender pass).
--Bidders must adhere to conditions regarding joint bidders' power of attorney, marking of business secrets, submission conditions, and cost submission requirements.
--Bidders must submit detailed information about team members, including their education and work experience.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The analysis must address the implementation of extended producer responsibility for removing micro-pollutants from wastewater, in accordance with the new EU directive.
--The technical description defines the requirements for the analysis concerning the implementation of extended producer responsibility for removing micro-pollutants from wastewater.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the tender is 30,000.0 EUR.
--Cost is a key evaluation criterion with a 40% weighting.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307670_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 13.3 KB

This document outlines requirements for joint bidder power of attorney, business secret declaration, bid submission conditions, and cost presentation, which are necessary for bid submission.

Meeskonnaliikmete andmed hankija etteantud vormilDOC
Andmed meeskonnaliikmete kohta.docx -- 35.5 KB

The bidder must submit detailed information about team members, including their education and work experience, for the contracting authority to assess their compliance with requirements.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307670_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.2 KB

The bid price and service description are the main evaluation criteria, with the price weighted at 40% and service quality at 60%.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307670_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 65.6 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is an initial self-declaration of the bidder's qualifications and compliance with tender conditions, to be filled out electronically.

HindamismetoodikaDOC
Hindamismetoodika_maksed.docx -- 44.3 KB

This document outlines the tender procedure, evaluation criteria, and scoring system used to assess bids based on economic advantage.

Lisateave pakkumuse koostamiseksDOC
Lisateave pakkumuse koostamiseks.docx -- 34.9 KB

This document provides additional information for bid preparation, including details on tender lot division, joint bids, marking of business secrets, and grounds for bid rejection.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline_kirjeldus_maksed.docx -- 48.0 KB

This technical specification outlines the requirements for an analysis on the implementation of extended producer responsibility for the removal of micro-pollutants from wastewater, in accordance with the new EU directive.

TöövõtulepingDOC
Töövõtuleping.docx -- 49.5 KB

This draft work contract outlines the terms and integral parts of the agreement related to the public procurement for the analysis of an extended producer responsibility payment system.

Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 23.1 KB

This power of attorney authorizes one joint bidder to represent all joint bidders in the tender procedure and contract execution.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an analysis of an extended producer responsibility payment system for micro-pollutant removal is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and evaluation criteria. However, it could benefit from more explicit details on sustainability aspects and a slightly more streamlined submission process.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and a reasonable submission deadline. No disputes are indicated. The procedure type 'A' (Open Procedure) is standard. The duration of the tender validity (4 months) is also reasonable.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service required is clear, detailing the context of the new EU directive and the specific objectives of the analysis. Requirements are documented, and evaluation criteria are specified, although the weighting of 'service quality' could be more granularly defined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, estimated value, and duration. Key documents like the 'Hankepass', 'Vastavustingimused', and 'Meeskonnaliikmete andmed' are required. However, the draft contract is not explicitly stated as a mandatory attachment for bidders, and the 'Hindamiskriteeriumid' document is marked as 'Required: No', which is unusual for a key evaluation document.

Hindamiskriteeriumid document marked as not required.
Fairness85/100

The tender is not divided into lots, which is acceptable for this value. Full document access is implied through the e-procurement portal. The value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable. Evaluation criteria are objective, and e-procurement is used. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are mandated. A document URL for the opening place is provided. The contract start date is specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed beyond the estimated value. The duration type is 'PERIOD', which is standard.

Financing information not explicitly detailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic. However, there are no specific social criteria or innovation focus detailed within the provided text. It is not explicitly stated as EU funded, though the context of the directive implies EU involvement.

Lack of specific social criteria and innovation focus.
No explicit mention of EU funding.

Strengths

Clear description of objectives and context.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Objective evaluation criteria with clear weighting for cost.
Reasonable deadlines and validity period.

Concerns

Hindamiskriteeriumid document marked as not required.
Limited explicit detail on sustainability aspects beyond 'Green Procurement'.
Financing information could be more detailed.

Recommendations

1. Clarify the mandatory status of the 'Hindamiskriteeriumid' document for bidders.
2. Provide more specific details on how sustainability and innovation will be assessed or incorporated.
3. Include a section on financing sources or confirmation of budget availability.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline