Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Milk bottles and drinking cups

Open
Deadline
2 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307665
Value
€28,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 17, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost for 2 years excluding VAT100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€28,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€72,774
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
93%
884 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of this procurement is to conclude a framework agreement for the purchase of food utensils, kitchen utensils and supplies for the Tartu University Hospital Foundation.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

60%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for milk bottles and drinking cups is heavily weighted towards price. A winning strategy will focus on aggressive, cost-competitive pricing while ensuring meticulous compliance with all mandatory and eligibility requirements. Differentiation will be challenging but can be achieved through exceptional service and product quality assurance.

Key Winning Messages

Unbeatable Value: Delivering the lowest total cost of ownership for essential clinical supplies.

Reliable Supply Chain: Ensuring consistent availability of critical items to support uninterrupted hospital operations.

Trusted Partnership: Demonstrating unwavering commitment to compliance and contractual obligations.

Key Opportunities
Leverage economies of scale to offer the lowest possible unit prices.
Thoroughly review and adhere to all instructions in 'Juhised pakkujale' to avoid disqualification.
Carefully analyze the draft framework agreement to understand all obligations and potential risks.
Ensure all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements are met and documented precisely.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, optimize supply chain, explore bulk purchasing discounts, and consider lean operational processes to achieve the lowest possible bid price without compromising quality or compliance.

Lack of specific technical capability requirements may lead to a broad range of competitors, including those with lower overheads.

Focus on demonstrating consistent product quality and reliability through supplier certifications or quality control processes, even if not explicitly requested. Highlight efficient delivery and order fulfillment.

No specified duration for the contract, implying potential for long-term commitment, which needs careful pricing.

Model pricing scenarios for extended periods, factoring in potential inflation or supply chain volatility, and ensure the bid reflects a sustainable long-term cost structure. Clearly state any assumptions made regarding duration in the bid.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A supplier with established, efficient manufacturing or sourcing capabilities for high-volume disposable or reusable milk bottles and drinking cups, capable of offering highly competitive unit prices. They should possess robust supply chain management to ensure consistent availability and timely delivery, and a strong track record of compliance with public procurement regulations.
Key Requirements
Submission of prices for the supply of milk bottles and drinking cups according to the provided specifications and quantities.
Confirmation of absence of sanctions.
Initial proof of entrepreneur's qualification and compliance with the contracting authority's requirements, to be filled in electronically.
Statement of participation in the procurement procedure.
Draft framework agreement detailing contract terms, parties' rights and obligations, and annexes.
Key Discriminators
Exceptional responsiveness and proactive communication throughout the bid process and potential contract period.
Demonstrated commitment to product quality and safety standards, even if not explicitly mandated.
A highly efficient and transparent order fulfillment and delivery process.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a statement on responsible sourcing of materials or waste reduction initiatives in product packaging, framing it as a commitment to the hospital's broader sustainability goals.
Bid Focus Areas
Total cost for 2 years excluding VAT100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price by optimizing all cost components: raw materials, manufacturing/sourcing, logistics, and overhead. Utilize the provided formula to understand the scoring impact of price differentials and aim for the maximum score by being the lowest bidder.

Recommendations7
Aggressively Price for the Lowest Bid
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% weight on total cost, every effort must be made to submit the lowest possible price. This requires a deep dive into cost structures, supply chain optimization, and potentially accepting lower margins to secure the contract. Model the scoring formula to understand the impact of price variations.

Directly impacts the likelihood of winning the contract.
Meticulous Compliance with Eligibility and Exclusion Grounds
CriticalMed effort

Thoroughly review and complete all sections of the electronic qualification forms (ESPD if applicable, or equivalent electronic submission) and provide all required statements and confirmations. Any omission or error here will lead to immediate disqualification.

Prevents disqualification.
Thorough Review of Draft Framework Agreement
CriticalMed effort

Understand all terms, conditions, rights, and obligations outlined in the draft framework agreement. Identify any clauses that may pose a risk or require clarification. Ensure the bid implicitly or explicitly confirms acceptance of these terms.

Ensures understanding of contractual obligations and potential risks.
Clarify Product Specifications and Quantities
HighLow effort

Ensure a precise understanding of the required milk bottles and drinking cups, including specifications and quantities. Any ambiguity could lead to incorrect pricing or product selection, impacting competitiveness.

Ensures accurate and competitive pricing.
Address Potential Long-Term Contract Implications
HighMed effort

Although the duration is not specified, assume a potential for a longer-term contract. Price accordingly, considering potential cost fluctuations over time. If possible, include assumptions about contract duration in the bid.

Ensures long-term profitability and avoids underpricing.
Highlight Supply Chain Reliability and Quality Assurance
MediumLow effort

Even without explicit technical requirements, emphasize the robustness of your supply chain and any quality control measures in place. This can build confidence in consistent product availability and quality, a key factor for a healthcare institution.

Builds trust and provides a subtle advantage over purely price-focused competitors.
Consider Optional Social Value Statement
LowLow effort

While not mandated, a brief, genuine statement about responsible sourcing or waste reduction can align with the hospital's broader institutional values and offer a minor point of differentiation.

Minor positive perception, potential subtle differentiator.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective supplier without compromising on essential quality and reliability. Emphasize the 'value for money' proposition. Focus on demonstrating operational efficiency that allows for aggressive pricing.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bids will be evaluated based on the total cost over two years, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--Bidders must submit prices for the supply of milk bottles and drinking cups according to the provided specifications and quantities.
--The tender includes a draft framework agreement detailing contract terms, parties' rights and obligations, and annexes.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Confirmation of absence of sanctions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Initial proof of entrepreneur's qualification and compliance with the contracting authority's requirements, to be filled in electronically.
--Joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.
--Submission of a statement of participation in the procurement procedure.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--None specified.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--None specified.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307665_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 13.7 KB

The contracting authority, Tartu University Hospital, requires participants in the milk bottles and drinking cups tender to submit a joint bidder authorization, application for participation, description of trade secrets, and confirmation of absence of sanctions.

Lisa 1 Maksumuse vormXLS
Lisa_1 Maksumuse vorm 537 1303.xlsx -- 124.8 KB

The bidder must provide pricing for the supply of milk bottles and drinking cups according to the specifications and quantities provided.

Vorm II AvaldusDOC
Vorm_II_Hankemenetluses_osalemise_avaldus 537... -- 27.8 KB

This form is an application to participate in the procurement procedure, where the bidder confirms agreement with the terms and readiness to submit a bid.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307665_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.6 KB

The tender evaluation will be based on the total cost for two years, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307665_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.4 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is an initial declaration of the bidder's qualifications and compliance with the contracting authority's requirements, to be filled out electronically.

Juhised pakkujalePDF
Juhised pakkujale 537.pdf -- 344.6 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders participating in the public procurement for milk bottles and drinking cups, clarifying the procedure, participation conditions, and submission requirements.

Raamlepingu projektPDF
Lisa 2 Raamlepingu projekt.pdf -- 530.1 KB

This document is a draft framework agreement outlining the terms, rights, and obligations of parties for the procurement of milk bottles and drinking cups, including its annexes.

Vorm I Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Vorm_I_Ühispakkujate_volikiri 537.docx -- 27.2 KB

This power of attorney is required for joint bidders to designate a single representative to sign the bid and conclude the framework agreement for the public procurement "Milk bottles and drinking cups" organized by the contracting authority Tartu University Hospital.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for milk bottles and drinking cups is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on contract duration and sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, a relevant CPV code, and no immediate dispute flags. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission period. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the platform used.

Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement's objective is clear. Requirements are documented, and conditions are generally specified. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria introduces ambiguity.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value and duration of tender validity. However, the contract duration is not explicitly specified, and some documents are in XML format not directly analyzable.

Contract duration not specified
XML documents not directly analyzable
Fairness85/100

The tender allows full document access and discloses the estimated value. Criteria for participation are objective. The use of e-procurement enhances fairness. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a document URL is provided. However, the contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The duration of the contract itself is also missing.

Contract start date not specified
Financing information absent
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these areas.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Reasonable submission deadline
Estimated value disclosed
CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Contract duration not specified
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria beyond lowest price.
2. Include details on contract duration and potential start date.
3. Incorporate sustainability or innovation requirements if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline