Skip to main content
Tenders

Intraocular fluid draining micros shunt

Open
Deadline
24 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307664
Value
€522,750
Location
Estonia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 17, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€522,750
Duration
24 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€92,792
Avg. Bids
2.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
3,220 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

1. The purpose of this procurement is to conclude a framework agreement for the purchase of intraocular fluid draining micros shunts. 2. The framework agreement will be concluded for a period of 2 (two) years from the date of conclusion of the agreement or until the maximum quantity of the agreement is reached, whichever occurs first. 3. The estimated quantity of micros shunts for two years is 615 units, distributed among hospitals as follows: Tartu University Hospital Foundation 260 units, Ida-Tallinn Central Hospital JSC 180 units, Pärnu Hospital Foundation 50 units, Ida-Viru Central Hospital Foundation 50 units, Viljandi Hospital Foundation 15 units, North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation 10 units, and OÜ Silmaarst Krista Turman 50 units.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--The tender is not divided into lots as the subject of the tender is an indivisible whole.
--The tender is for the procurement of intraocular fluid-draining microshunts.
--The framework agreement defines the terms for the procurement of intraocular fluid-draining microshunts by multiple hospitals, with Tartu University Hospital representing all buyers upon contract signing.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must confirm that they will not engage subcontractors or suppliers associated with the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Participation is restricted to bidders from EU and EEA countries.
--In case of a joint bid, a power of attorney must be submitted.
--Business secrets must be marked.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit a microshunt that meets the technical requirements specified in Annex 1.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The lowest price will receive the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307664_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 12.8 KB

The bidder must confirm that no subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation will be involved, and in case of a joint bid, provide a power of attorney and specify trade secrets.

Pakkuja esitab tehnilistele nõuetele vastava pakkumuse Lisa 1 Word-formaadis.DOC
Lisa_1_tehnilised_nõuded.docx -- 29.2 KB

Bidders must submit a micro-shunt proposal that meets technical requirements, by completing Annex 1 in Word format.

Esitada hankemenetluses osalemise avaldus vastavalt Lisa 3 vormile II.DOC
Lisa_3_vorm II.docx -- 31.3 KB

The bidder must submit an application for participation in the procurement procedure according to the provided Form II, which includes basic company information.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307664_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307664_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.3 KB

The procurement passport is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and expected response formats, but is not a document intended for completion itself.

Juhised pakkujalePDF
Juhised pakkujale.pdf -- 197.1 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders participating in an open tender procedure for the procurement of an intraocular fluid-draining micro-shunt, outlining eligibility rules for EU and EEA countries and general submission conditions.

Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Lisa_3_vorm I.docx -- 31.0 KB

This document is a joint bidder's power of attorney, authorizing one joint bidder to represent others in the tender procedure.

RaamlepingPDF
Raamleping.pdf -- 190.2 KB

This framework agreement outlines the terms for the procurement of intraocular fluid-draining microshunts by multiple hospitals, with the University of Tartu Hospital acting as the representative signatory for all buyers.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for intraocular fluid-draining microshunts is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has some minor practical limitations regarding document access.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines are reasonable. The procedure type 'A' and framework agreement type 'WITHOUT_REOPENING_COMPETITION' are standard.

Clarity80/100

The description of the tender's objective and the distribution of quantities among hospitals is clear. Technical requirements are referenced in Annex 1, and evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting with the lowest price receiving maximum score. Eligibility and submission requirements are also clearly outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and start date. However, the specific content of Annex 1 (technical specifications) and Form II (application for participation) is not directly accessible or summarized, impacting the completeness of the provided information for a full assessment.

Specific content of Annex 1 (technical specifications) and Form II (application for participation) not fully detailed.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open to EU and EEA countries, promoting fairness. The evaluation criterion is solely based on the lowest price, which is objective. The use of e-procurement and electronic submission further enhances fairness. The restriction on subcontractors/suppliers associated with the Russian Federation is a geopolitical consideration rather than a company-specific tailoring.

Practicality65/100

The tender mandates electronic submission, which is practical. However, the URL for the opening place is a general portal, and specific document URLs are not provided, requiring navigation within the portal. The contract start date is specified, but financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Specific document URLs are not provided, requiring navigation within the e-procurement portal.
Financing information is not explicitly detailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The timeline for reveal, submission, and opening dates is consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the sustainability score.

No explicit mention of green procurement.
No explicit mention of social aspects.

Strengths

Clear description of tender objective and quantity distribution.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Mandatory electronic submission and e-procurement.
Compliance with EU/EEA eligibility.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).
Specific technical specifications (Annex 1) and application forms (Form II) not fully detailed.
No direct links to specific tender documents.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria into the evaluation or technical requirements.
2. Provide direct links or more detailed summaries of key documents like Annex 1 and Form II.
3. Include information regarding the financing source for transparency.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline