Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Maintenance of road markings in Narva city 2026

Open
Deadline
3 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
307653
Value
€132,800
Location
Estonia
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of road marking maintenance100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€132,800
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€87,523
Avg. Bids
2.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
89%
82 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The Narva City Government's Urban Management Department proposes to participate in the public procurement 'Maintenance of road markings in Narva city 2026' and to submit a bid in accordance with the conditions contained in the procurement notice (hereinafter referred to as PN) and the public procurement register.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender heavily favors price-driven bids for road marking maintenance. A winning strategy will focus on aggressive cost optimization while ensuring strict adherence to technical standards and a robust, transparent pricing structure. Proactive risk management regarding subcontractor vetting is also crucial.

Key Winning Messages

The most cost-effective and compliant solution for Narva's road marking needs.

Reliable execution meeting EVS 614:2022 standards at an unbeatable price.

Transparent and efficient service delivery for Narva Linnavalitsuse Linnamajandusamet.

Key Opportunities
Aggressive pricing due to 100% cost-based evaluation.
Streamlined submission process using the procurement pass (ESPD) as self-declaration.
Opportunity to demonstrate operational efficiency and cost control.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost evaluation.

Conduct a thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings. Explore bulk purchasing of materials, optimize labor scheduling, and invest in efficient application machinery. Consider a slightly lower profit margin if feasible to secure the contract.

Potential for subcontractor issues impacting compliance and reputation.

Thoroughly vet all potential subcontractors. Request detailed information on their compliance history and implement strict contractual clauses regarding their conduct. Have contingency plans for critical subcontractors.

Ensuring strict adherence to EVS 614:2022 standards while maintaining low costs.

Document all quality control processes and material certifications. Train staff on the specific requirements of EVS 614:2022 and implement regular site inspections. Highlight these quality assurance measures in the bid to reassure the client.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A road marking contractor with a proven track record of efficient operations, strong supply chain management for thermoplastic and paint, and a lean cost structure. Experience with similar municipal contracts and a deep understanding of Estonian road marking standards (EVS 614:2022) are essential. The ability to demonstrate cost-effectiveness without compromising quality is paramount.
Key Requirements
Adherence to standard EVS 614:2022 for road marking restoration, application, and removal.
Submission of a detailed price table for installation, restoration, and removal costs.
Confirmation of acceptance of tender conditions via the procurement pass (ESPD).
Contractor's own confirmation as initial evidence instead of certificates (tender pass).
Subcontractor vetting for criminal organizations and corruption.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrable cost savings through operational efficiency and bulk material procurement.
A clear and transparent pricing breakdown that justifies the low cost.
A robust quality assurance plan that guarantees compliance with EVS 614:2022.
Proactive and transparent subcontractor management process.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a commitment to using locally sourced materials where feasible, or a pledge to employ local labor for a portion of the work, framed as a benefit to the Narva community and potentially a cost-saving measure through reduced travel.
Bid Focus Areas
Total cost of road marking maintenance100.0%

Develop an aggressive pricing strategy by meticulously analyzing all cost components (materials, labor, equipment, overhead). Ensure the price table is detailed, accurate, and clearly demonstrates value for money. Aim to be the lowest bidder while ensuring profitability.

Recommendations6
Aggressive Cost Optimization
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct a granular cost breakdown of all tender elements (materials, labor, equipment, overhead, profit). Identify opportunities for cost reduction through efficient logistics, bulk purchasing, and optimized work processes. Aim to submit the lowest possible price that still ensures a sustainable profit margin.

Directly maximizes score on the 100% cost-based evaluation criterion.
Meticulous EVS 614:2022 Compliance
CriticalMed effort

Thoroughly review and understand all aspects of standard EVS 614:2022. Ensure all proposed materials and application methods strictly adhere to these requirements. Highlight quality control procedures and certifications in the bid to demonstrate compliance.

Prevents disqualification and builds client confidence in service quality.
Detailed and Transparent Pricing Table
HighMed effort

Create a comprehensive price table as requested, detailing costs for installation, restoration, and removal. Break down costs per square meter or unit where possible. Clarity and transparency will build trust and justify the proposed price.

Meets submission requirements and supports the low-price strategy.
Proactive Subcontractor Vetting
HighMed effort

Implement a rigorous vetting process for all potential subcontractors, focusing on their history regarding criminal organizations and corruption. Request detailed documentation and references. Clearly outline your subcontractor management plan in the bid.

Mitigates risk of disqualification or contract termination due to subcontractor issues.
Demonstrate Operational Efficiency
MediumLow effort

While price is key, subtly highlight operational efficiencies that enable the low cost. This could include modern equipment, experienced teams, or streamlined project management. Frame this as a benefit to the client through timely and efficient service delivery.

Adds credibility to the low-price offer and positions the bidder as a competent service provider.
Accurate Procurement Pass (ESPD) Completion
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the procurement pass (ESPD) is completed accurately and comprehensively, serving as the primary self-declaration. Double-check all confirmations of acceptance of tender conditions.

Essential for bid eligibility and initial qualification.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most economically advantageous offer that fully meets all technical and legal requirements. Emphasize reliability and compliance to offset the pure price focus, assuring the client they are not sacrificing quality for cost.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit a bid that includes a detailed price table.
--The tender pass is the entrepreneur's own confirmation, which serves as initial evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected answers.
--The contracting authority will check the background of subcontractors for membership in criminal organizations and corruption, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The contracting authority has the right to check the absence of grounds for exclusion and qualification only from the successful bidder (so-called reverse procedure).
--The contracting authority reserves the right to apply Section 52, Paragraph 3 of the Public Procurement Act.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must confirm acceptance of the conditions set out in the tender documents upon submission of the bid.
--Bidders must provide a declaration of acceptance of the conditions set out in the tender documents.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The subject of the contract is the restoration, application, and removal of approximately 13,000 m² of road marking using thermoplastic and paint, in accordance with standard EVS 614:2022 and the client's requirements.
--The contracting authority finds it necessary to order the services as a whole, as dividing the tender into parts is not expedient.
--Dividing the tender into parts may lead to a significant increase in the price of the ordered services.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The bid evaluation criteria focus on the cost of road marking maintenance, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.
--Bidders must submit a price table detailing the costs of installation, restoration, and removal of road markings.
--The total value of the tender is 132,800.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307653_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 35.2 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors for involvement in criminal organizations and corruption, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307653_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 5.7 KB

This compliance conditions document confirms the acceptance of terms set forth in the tender documents upon submission of the bid, including requirements for bid cost submission and joint bidder authorizations.

Lisa 2. MaksumustabelXLS
Lisa 2 Pakkumuse maksumustabel.xlsx -- 11.9 KB

The bidder must submit a cost table detailing the expenses for applying, restoring, and removing road markings.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307653_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The tender evaluation criteria focus on the cost of road marking maintenance, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307653_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 67.5 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is the economic operator's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 30.8 KB

The subject of the tender contract is the restoration, application, and removal of approximately 13,000 m² of road markings using thermoplastic and paint, in accordance with standard EVS 614:2022 and the client's requirements.

Lisa 3. Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 3 Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 43.8 KB

This document is the draft of the work contract for the maintenance of road markings in Narva city in 2026, outlining the parties, scope of work, contractor's obligations, and confirmations.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road marking maintenance in Narva is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation process focused on price. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has a relatively short submission window.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations. The CPV code is provided, and the procedure is standard. Deadlines are reasonable for an e-procurement process. No immediate legal disputes are indicated.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, detailing the scope of work and the relevant standard (EVS 614:2022). Requirements for bidders, including the use of the procurement pass and subcontractor checks, are documented. The evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting based on price.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. Key documents like the technical specification, cost table, and contract draft are available. However, the financing condition could be more detailed regarding the process for additional funds if bids exceed the estimate.

Financing condition could be more detailed regarding the process for additional funds if bids exceed the estimate.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, ensuring broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and the evaluation criteria are objective (lowest price). The requirement for a 'procurement pass' as self-declaration is standard. No specific company is favored.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a URL for the e-procurement portal is provided. The contract start date is specified. Financing is from the municipal budget. The duration is defined by the contract term ending 31.12.2025, which is clear.

The submission deadline is relatively short (19 days from reveal date).
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening, Contract Start) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Clear technical specifications and scope of work.
Objective evaluation criteria focused on price.
Standard e-procurement process for accessibility.
All essential tender documents provided.

Concerns

Limited sustainability considerations.
Relatively short submission deadline.
Financing condition could be more detailed.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate sustainability criteria (e.g., eco-friendly materials, waste reduction) in future tenders.
2. Consider extending the submission deadline to allow more time for bidders.
3. Provide more detailed information on the contingency plan for budget overruns.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline