Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login21 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
6 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the conditions for controlling subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on preventing fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking.
Bidders must confirm agreement with tender conditions, submit a completed cost breakdown in Excel, and explain any business secrets to ensure a compliant bid.
The contracting authority requests the submission of a cost breakdown, detailing expenses for carrying out the works, including general costs and site preparation costs.
The tender contract cost is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest bid price receives the maximum score.
The tender pass is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as initial proof of compliance with the contracting authority's conditions, but it is filled out electronically.
This document outlines the general terms of the procurement procedure, exclusion grounds, and qualification requirements, presented within an electronic tender process.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for road repair works is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it could benefit from more explicit sustainability considerations and clearer guidance on certain submission formats.
The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are indicated. The procedure type 'E' and 'A' are standard. The 'Status: 11' likely indicates an active procurement phase.
The description of the works is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of what is expected. The evaluation criteria are specified as 'relative_weighting' with the contract cost being the sole criterion, which is understandable for this type of work.
Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the reliance on attached documents for crucial details like 'Riigihanke alusdokument' and the unanalyzable formats for some documents (ESPD, HD I, HD III, HD IV) reduce completeness. The justification for not dividing into parts is mentioned but not detailed in the provided text.
The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting transparency. The value is disclosed, and the evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a fair process.
Electronic submission and e-procurement are positive. However, the mention of unanalyzable file formats for key documents (ESPD, HD I, HD III, HD IV) poses a practical challenge for bidders relying solely on the provided text. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, only the duration.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender validity period aligns with the submission and opening dates.
The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is positive. However, there is no further detail on specific social aspects or innovation focus within the provided text. It is also not explicitly stated as EU funded.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required