Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Rehabilitation of the pavement of State Road 4 Tallinn - Pärnu - Ikla from km 175 to 191.4 and repair of the Metsküla parking lot road in 1990

Open
Deadline
15 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307648
Value
€1,978,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 24, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of rehabilitation of the pavement of State Road 4 Tallinn - Pärnu - Ikla km 175 - 191.4 and repair of the Metsküla parking lot road in 1990100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€1,978,000
Duration
4 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Rehabilitation of the pavement of State Road 4 Tallinn - Pärnu - Ikla from km 175 to 191.4 and repair of the Metsküla parking lot road in 1990 in accordance with the conditions set out in the public procurement base documents.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender focuses solely on cost, making a highly competitive price the primary driver of success. Bidders must meticulously detail their cost breakdown, demonstrating efficiency and value. While social and innovative aspects are absent, a strong emphasis on technical capability and adherence to green procurement principles will be crucial for differentiation.

Key Winning Messages

Unbeatable Value: Delivering the most cost-effective solution for high-quality road rehabilitation.

Efficient Execution: A proven ability to complete complex roadworks within tight deadlines.

Sustainable Infrastructure: Commitment to environmentally responsible construction practices.

Key Opportunities
Leveraging economies of scale and efficient project management to offer a highly competitive price.
Demonstrating a clear understanding of the technical specifications (HD III Tehniline kirjeldus) to build confidence in execution capability.
Highlighting any existing sustainable practices or materials that align with the 'Green Procurement: Yes' requirement, even if not explicitly detailed in the AI-extracted requirements.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the 100% cost-based evaluation.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all potential cost-saving measures, and ensure the cost breakdown is meticulously detailed and justifiable to avoid any perception of underbidding without a clear rationale.

Potential for unforeseen site conditions or material price fluctuations impacting the submitted cost.

Include a reasonable contingency within the general costs, clearly explain the assumptions made in the cost breakdown, and ensure robust supply chain management.

The absence of specific social or innovative aspects in the tender may limit differentiation beyond price and technical execution.

Focus on excelling in the defined criteria: cost, technical capability, and green procurement. Ensure the cost breakdown is flawless and the technical proposal is robust.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced road construction company with a proven track record in similar rehabilitation projects, possessing strong cost management capabilities and a commitment to sustainable practices. They should be adept at detailed cost breakdown preparation and capable of delivering the project within the specified four-month timeframe.
Key Requirements
Submission of a completed cost breakdown in Excel, including detailed costs for execution of works, general costs, and site preparation.
Confirmation of agreement with tender conditions and completion of the electronic tender pass (ESPD).
Explanation of business secrets.
Compliance with green procurement requirements.
Demonstrated technical capability for road construction works.
Key Discriminators
A meticulously detailed and transparent cost breakdown that clearly articulates cost efficiencies and value for money.
Demonstrated experience in similar-scale road rehabilitation projects with a focus on efficient project delivery.
Proactive integration of green procurement principles beyond minimum requirements, showcasing a genuine commitment to sustainability.
Social Value Opportunities
While social aspects are not explicitly requested, consider including a statement on commitment to local employment or responsible waste management within the general costs or as an addendum, framing it as a natural extension of efficient and responsible project execution.
Bid Focus Areas
Cost of rehabilitation of the pavement of State Road 4 Tallinn - Pärnu - Ikla km 175 - 191.4 and repair of the Metsküla parking lot road in 1990100.0%

Develop a highly competitive and well-justified cost breakdown. Ensure all costs (execution, general, site preparation) are detailed and reflect efficient operations. Benchmark against similar projects to ensure competitiveness while maintaining profitability. The lowest bid price receives maximum points, so aggressive pricing is key.

Recommendations5
Master the Cost Breakdown
CriticalHigh effort

Dedicate significant resources to preparing the Excel cost breakdown. Ensure it is detailed, transparent, and defensible. Every line item should be justifiable and reflect efficient operational practices. Benchmark against industry standards and recent similar projects to ensure competitiveness.

Directly impacts the primary evaluation criterion, maximizing the chance of winning.
Flawless Tender Pass and Condition Confirmation
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the electronic tender pass (ESPD) is completed accurately and all mandatory confirmations of agreement with tender conditions are provided. Any errors here can lead to immediate disqualification.

Ensures eligibility and avoids disqualification.
Proactive Green Procurement Integration
HighMed effort

Even though not heavily detailed, actively integrate and highlight sustainable practices in the bid. This could include using recycled materials where appropriate, efficient waste management plans, or low-emission equipment. Document these in the technical proposal or cost breakdown's general costs.

Provides a competitive edge beyond price and demonstrates alignment with the contracting authority's stated green procurement objective.
Thorough Risk Assessment for Costing
HighMed effort

Conduct a comprehensive risk assessment for potential cost overruns, including material price fluctuations, unforeseen ground conditions, and labor availability. Build appropriate contingencies into the general costs and clearly state any assumptions made.

Protects profitability and avoids issues during contract execution.
Clarify Business Secrets Explanation
MediumLow effort

Prepare a clear and concise explanation of any business secrets that need to be disclosed. Ensure it meets the tender's requirements without compromising sensitive information.

Fulfills a mandatory requirement and avoids potential issues.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on quality or adherence to green procurement. Emphasize efficiency in project delivery and a clear understanding of the technical requirements. Highlight any specific expertise in road rehabilitation that translates to cost savings and timely completion.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

21 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (11)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (4)
Technical (1)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS11
--Bidders must confirm their agreement with the tender conditions.
--Bidders must submit a completed cost breakdown in Excel.
--Bidders must explain business secrets.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders must confirm their agreement with the tender conditions.
--Bidders must explain business secrets.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm their agreement with the tender conditions.
--Bidders must submit a completed cost breakdown in Excel.
--Bidders must explain business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The tender is for road construction works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender value is 1978000.0 EUR.
--The contract duration is 4 months.
--The cost breakdown must include detailed costs for the execution of works, including general costs and costs for the preparation of the construction site.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307648_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 29.9 KB

This document outlines the conditions for controlling subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on preventing fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307648_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.8 KB

Bidders must confirm agreement with tender conditions, submit a completed cost breakdown in Excel, and explain any business secrets to ensure a compliant bid.

HD IV KululoendXLS
HD IV Kululoend.xlsx -- 25.5 KB

The contracting authority requests the submission of a cost breakdown, detailing expenses for carrying out the works, including general costs and site preparation costs.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307648_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The tender contract cost is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest bid price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307648_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 76.3 KB

The tender pass is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as initial proof of compliance with the contracting authority's conditions, but it is filled out electronically.

Riigihanke alusdokumentDOC
Riigihanke alusdokument.docx -- 34.4 KB

This document outlines the general terms of the procurement procedure, exclusion grounds, and qualification requirements, presented within an electronic tender process.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road repair works is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it could benefit from more explicit sustainability considerations and clearer guidance on certain submission formats.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are indicated. The procedure type 'E' and 'A' are standard. The 'Status: 11' likely indicates an active procurement phase.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of what is expected. The evaluation criteria are specified as 'relative_weighting' with the contract cost being the sole criterion, which is understandable for this type of work.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the reliance on attached documents for crucial details like 'Riigihanke alusdokument' and the unanalyzable formats for some documents (ESPD, HD I, HD III, HD IV) reduce completeness. The justification for not dividing into parts is mentioned but not detailed in the provided text.

Some essential documents are in unanalyzable formats (.xml, .zip), hindering full assessment.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting transparency. The value is disclosed, and the evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a fair process.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are positive. However, the mention of unanalyzable file formats for key documents (ESPD, HD I, HD III, HD IV) poses a practical challenge for bidders relying solely on the provided text. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, only the duration.

Some critical documents are in formats not directly analyzable by AI, potentially impacting bidder preparation.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender validity period aligns with the submission and opening dates.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is positive. However, there is no further detail on specific social aspects or innovation focus within the provided text. It is also not explicitly stated as EU funded.

Lack of specific details on green procurement, social aspects, and innovation.

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization details.
Electronic submission and e-procurement are utilized.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Reasonable deadlines and contract duration.
Mention of Green Procurement.

Concerns

Some critical documents are in unanalyzable formats (.xml, .zip).
Limited detail on sustainability aspects beyond the mention of 'Green Procurement'.
Contract start date is not explicitly stated.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all essential tender documents are provided in accessible formats for bidders.
2. Elaborate on the specific green procurement, social, and innovation requirements.
3. Clearly state the contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline