Skip to main content
Tenders

Making the Purtiveski dam passable for fish

Open
Deadline
25 days left
April 21, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307645
Value
€30,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 14, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 21, 2026

Tender Opening

April 21, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 11, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€30,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The aim of the work is to improve the migration conditions for fish in the Purtse River.
Green ProcurementEU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--All tender documents are mandatory for the bidder.
--The tender pass is a self-declaration by the entrepreneur, serving as initial proof in lieu of certificates from authorities or third parties.
--The format for expected answers in the tender pass is specified.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be involved in fraud, money laundering, or human trafficking.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Prior site visit to the object is mandatory.
--Bidders must submit a power of attorney for joint bidders.
--Business secrets must be marked.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The project involves works for making the Purtsiveski dam passable for fish.
--Specific works include: preparation, removal of brushwood, creation of access, demolition of the opening, and reshaping of stone embankments.
--Requirements for work safety and personal protective equipment are included in the contract draft.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total cost of the bid is an important evaluation criterion.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307645_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will verify subcontractors' backgrounds regarding fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307645_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.0 KB

Tender documents include compliance conditions, such as mandatory prior guided site visit, bid submission rules, joint bidder authorization requirements, business secret marking, and confirmation of equivalence.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307645_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.9 KB

The contracting authority Riigimetsa Majandamise Keskus is seeking bids for the Purtsiveski dam fish passage project, where the total bid cost is a significant evaluation factor.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307645_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.3 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and expected response format.

HankedokumentDOC
HD.docx -- 56.9 KB

The State Forest Management Centre invites bids for an open tender procedure to make the Purtsiveski dam passable for fish, where all tender documents are mandatory for the bidder.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lepingu projekt.docx -- 57.2 KB

This document is a draft of the contractor agreement, outlining contract terms, technical specifications, and requirements for work safety and personal protective equipment.

Lepingu lisa 3 – Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 3- Tehniline kirjeldus Purtsiveski pais.... -- 44.9 KB

This technical specification details the works required to make the Purtsiveski dam passable for fish, including preparatory work, vegetation removal, access creation, opening demolition, and reshaping of stone walls.

Ühispakkujate volikiri ja kinnitusDOC
Ühispakkujate volikiri ja kinnitus.doc -- 34.5 KB

The joint bidder's authorization and confirmation is a required document proving the rights and obligations of joint bidder members and confirming their compliance with tender conditions.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for fish passage improvement at Purtsi river is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a reasonable estimated value. Key documents are available, and the process leverages e-procurement. However, there is limited explicit detail on innovation and social criteria beyond general mentions.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable, and the financing source is clearly stated. No immediate disputes or regulatory compliance issues are flagged.

Clarity80/100

The project's objective is clearly stated, and the technical requirements are outlined in the description and technical specifications. The evaluation criteria mention relative weighting, which is standard. Conditions for contract modifications are also explained.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the contract draft and technical specifications are marked as 'No' for required, which could be improved. The financing condition is detailed.

Contract draft and technical specifications marked as not required.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, uses e-procurement, and discloses the estimated value. Objective criteria are mentioned (relative weighting). The mandatory site visit is a common practice to ensure bidders have full information. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. The contract start date is specified. However, the availability of all documents via a direct URL is not explicitly confirmed, and the practicality of the XML ESPD format for all bidders is not guaranteed.

URL for all tender documents not explicitly confirmed.
Practicality of XML ESPD format for all bidders.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. The status is '11', indicating an active tender. No suspensions or disputes are noted, and the dates are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' and 'Social Criteria' as characteristics, and the financing is from an EU fund related to improving fish spawning conditions, which has environmental benefits. However, specific details or measurable targets for innovation or social aspects are not elaborated upon.

Lack of specific details on innovation and social criteria.

Strengths

Clear project objective and technical scope
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission
Well-defined financing source
Reasonable estimated value and deadlines

Concerns

Contract draft and technical specifications marked as not required
Limited explicit detail on innovation and social criteria
Potential practicality issues with XML ESPD format

Recommendations

1. Ensure all essential documents, including contract drafts and technical specifications, are clearly marked as required.
2. Provide more specific details or measurable targets for green procurement and social criteria.
3. Clarify the accessibility and usability of the XML ESPD format for all potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline