Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Mapping and organization of data on cycling and pedestrian infrastructure

Open
Deadline
23 days left
April 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
307605
Value
€150,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 23, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 27, 2026

Tender Opening

April 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 26, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€150,000
Duration
7 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€40,919
Avg. Bids
1.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
95%
495 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Nationwide mapping and organization of data on cycling and pedestrian infrastructure in accordance with the conditions set out in the tender documents.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

60%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for mapping and organizing cycling and walking infrastructure data is heavily weighted towards cost. A winning strategy will focus on delivering a highly competitive price while demonstrating robust technical capability in geoinformatics and GIS development, ensuring compliance with all mandatory and eligibility requirements.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-effective, high-quality data mapping and organization for enhanced mobility.

Leveraging expert geospatial and GIS capabilities for accurate and efficient data management.

Key Opportunities
Aggressive pricing due to the 100% cost weighting.
Demonstrating specialized technical expertise in geoinformatics and GIS development.
Streamlined submission process by ensuring all mandatory documents and confirmations are meticulously prepared.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings and efficiencies. Explore opportunities for process automation and lean operations. Consider strategic partnerships if they can lead to cost reductions without compromising quality.

Ensuring all mandatory and eligibility requirements are met precisely to avoid disqualification.

Implement a rigorous internal review process for all submitted documents, especially the Hankepass and CVs. Assign a dedicated compliance officer to oversee the bid preparation and submission.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A specialized geospatial data company with a proven track record in public sector projects, possessing a strong team of experienced geoinformaticians and GIS developers, and a highly efficient operational model that allows for aggressive pricing.
Key Requirements
CVs of geoinformaticians proving experience in spatial data processing and analysis related to transport infrastructure data.
CVs of GIS developers proving skills and experience in GIS databases, data processing automation, spatial data validation, and technical support for geoinformaticians.
Hankepass (enterprise's own confirmation) as initial proof of meeting the conditions set by the contracting authority.
Confirmation of agreement with the tender notice conditions.
Total bid cost (100% weight).
Key Discriminators
Demonstrable efficiency in data processing and automation techniques that translate to lower costs without sacrificing accuracy.
A highly experienced and specialized team with a proven track record in similar public sector geospatial projects.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a commitment to using local suppliers for any necessary hardware or software, or a plan for knowledge transfer to the contracting authority's staff, framed as an added value.
Bid Focus Areas
Total bid cost100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price that is still profitable and sustainable. This requires meticulous cost breakdown, identification of efficiencies, and potentially leveraging economies of scale. Every euro saved directly translates to a higher score.

Recommendations5
Aggressively Price for Cost Leadership
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% weighting on total bid cost, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible viable price. Conduct a detailed cost-out exercise, identifying all direct and indirect costs, and explore all avenues for efficiency and cost reduction. This may involve optimizing workflows, leveraging existing technology, or negotiating favorable terms with suppliers.

Directly maximizes score for the most critical evaluation criterion.
Meticulously Prepare and Validate Hankepass and CVs
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the Hankepass is completed accurately and comprehensively, serving as initial proof of meeting all conditions. The CVs for geoinformaticians and GIS developers must clearly highlight experience directly relevant to spatial data processing, transport infrastructure, GIS databases, and automation, as specified in the technical requirements. Any gaps in experience should be addressed with strong justifications or supporting documentation.

Prevents disqualification and demonstrates technical competence.
Develop a Robust Data Processing and Validation Methodology
HighMed effort

While cost is paramount, the technical capability is still a mandatory requirement. Outline a clear, efficient, and scalable methodology for data mapping and organization. Emphasize automation in data processing and validation to showcase efficiency, which indirectly supports the cost-competitiveness.

Meets technical requirements and subtly reinforces cost-efficiency.
Highlight Automation and Efficiency in GIS Workflows
MediumMed effort

Even without an explicit innovation requirement, showcasing how your GIS development team utilizes automation for data processing, validation, and quality control can be a subtle differentiator. This implies a more efficient operation, which can be linked to cost savings.

Positions the bidder as technologically advanced and efficient.
Establish a Strict Compliance and Quality Assurance Check
HighMed effort

Implement a multi-stage review process for all bid components, focusing on compliance with tender conditions, accuracy of information, and completeness of documentation. A dedicated compliance lead should oversee this to minimize the risk of errors or omissions that could lead to disqualification.

Minimizes risk of disqualification and ensures a high-quality submission.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on the essential technical expertise required for accurate and efficient data mapping. Emphasize the value proposition of delivering high-quality results at the lowest possible price point.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (8)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Bids must be submitted electronically.
--Bidders must mark and justify business secrets.
--Bidders must provide data of authorized persons.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must confirm their agreement with the tender notice conditions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must meet the established qualification requirements.
--Bidders must submit bids only for the desired parts.
--Bidders must declare and justify business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit CVs of geoinformaticians proving their experience in spatial data processing and analysis related to transport infrastructure data.
--Bidders must submit CVs of GIS developers proving their skills and experience in GIS databases, data processing automation, spatial data validation, and technical support for geoinformaticians.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The evaluation criteria primarily focus on the total cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307605_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.6 KB

Bidders must confirm acceptance of tender notice conditions, submit bids only for requested parts, identify and justify trade secrets, and provide authorized person details.

Geoinformaatiku(te) CV(d)DOC
HD I Vorm 3-1 Meeskonnaliikme CV (geoinformaa... -- 33.3 KB

Bidders must submit CVs of geoinformation specialists demonstrating their experience in spatial data processing and analysis related to transport infrastructure data.

GIS-arendaja(te) CV(d)DOC
HD I Vorm 3-2 Meeskonnaliikme CV (GISarendaja... -- 33.2 KB

Bidders must submit CVs for GIS developers, demonstrating their skills and experience in GIS databases, data processing automation, spatial data validation, and technical support for geoinformatics professionals.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307605_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The tender evaluation criteria primarily focus on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307605_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.7 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as initial proof of meeting the contracting authority's conditions, and is not intended for completion but for familiarization.

HD II Hankelepingu projektDOC
HD II Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 46.6 KB

This document is a draft of the works contract outlining the terms, annexes, and general requirements for the mapping and organization of cycling and pedestrian infrastructure data.

HD III lisa 2 Teeregistri imporditabelidXLS
HD III lisa 2 Teeregistri imporditabelid.xlsx -- 24.8 KB

This document outlines the structure and sample data for road register import tables, which must be completed for mapping cycling and pedestrian infrastructure data.

HD III Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
HD III Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 84.4 KB

The Transport Administration is seeking a contractor to map and organize nationwide data on cycling and walking infrastructure to ensure up-to-date information and support mobility policy development.

Riigihanke alusdokumentDOC
Riigihanke alusdokument.docx -- 32.9 KB

The Transport Administration is conducting a tender for mapping and organizing cycling and pedestrian infrastructure data, where bidders must meet established qualification requirements and submit their bids electronically.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for mapping cycling and pedestrian infrastructure data is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a focus on cost-effectiveness. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some document formats are not machine-readable.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements for public procurement, including proper CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission period. No disputes are noted.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview. Key criteria are specified, although the full extent of 'qualification requirements' would be detailed in the base document.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, some crucial documents (e.g., 'Riigihanke alusdokument') are marked as not required, which is unusual for a tender of this nature. The AI could not analyze certain file formats.

Key tender documents marked as not required.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the evaluation criteria are clearly stated as primarily cost-based with relative weighting. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting a fair competitive environment.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is mandated, and a contract start date is provided. However, the financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the duration, while specified, includes a period for acceptance which could extend the actual execution time.

Financing information not explicitly detailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. The tender is active and not suspended, and there are no noted disputes, contributing to high data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded, which limits its sustainability score.

Lack of explicit green or social procurement criteria.

Strengths

Clear description of services required.
Electronic submission and e-procurement process.
Cost-based evaluation criteria with relative weighting.
Well-defined timeline and contract duration.

Concerns

Key tender documents marked as not required.
Some document formats not machine-readable by AI.
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations.

Recommendations

1. Clarify the status and necessity of all documents listed in the tender.
2. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria into future tenders.
3. Ensure all tender documents are in machine-readable formats where possible.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline