Skip to main content
Tenders

Outdoor Area Construction Works for Sillamäe Estonian Primary School

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307581
Value
€452,432
Location
Estonia
Published
March 16, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€452,432
Duration
6 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of parking lots and sidewalks, construction of sports fields.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (7)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bids must be submitted electronically.
--Bids must adhere to the specified deadlines.
--The bid submission proposal document outlines formatting and submission procedures.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Bidders must confirm acceptance of the contracting authority's conditions.
--Bidders must provide data on subcontractors.
--Bidders must declare information related to business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit CVs for the project manager and site manager, including work experience and project descriptions (Form 4).
--The construction project manager must be qualified.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit the cost of the bid.
--Bidders must fill in unit price fields for various construction works in the bid cost table (Form 3).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307581_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will verify subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing to ensure reliable contract execution.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307581_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.3 KB

Bidders must submit compliance conditions covering acceptance of the contracting authority's terms, subcontractor data, business secret information, bid cost submission, and construction project manager qualifications.

Vorm 2DOC
Vorm 2.docx -- 19.0 KB

Form 2 is an application for participation in the procurement procedure, confirming acceptance of terms and compliance of the bid with requirements.

Vorm 3 Pakkumuse maksumuse tabelXLS
Vorm 3 Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel.xlsx -- 16.5 KB

This document is a tender cost table where the bidder must fill in the unit price fields for various construction works.

Vorm 4DOC
Vorm 4.docx -- 18.6 KB

The contracting authority requires the submission of Form 4, which includes CVs for the project manager and site manager with descriptions of work experience and projects.

Vorm 8DOC
Vorm 8.docx -- 13.7 KB

This document is a joint tender authorization letter, empowering one bidder to represent others in a joint bid.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307581_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307581_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.6 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the contractor, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not a document intended for completion.

Alusdokument pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekDOC
Alusdokument pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.do... -- 43.2 KB

This document outlines the proposal for submitting a bid, its preparation, and submission for the public procurement 'Sillamäe Estonian Primary School Outdoor Area Construction Works', including electronic submission and deadlines.

Lepingu projekt ehitus ETY_2025DOC
Lepingu projekt ehitus ETY_2025.docx -- 142.1 KB

This document is a draft construction works contract, outlining general and specific terms, and detailing information about the client, contractor, and construction site.

Tehniline kirjeldus ehitustööd_Sillamäe Eesti Põhikooli välialaDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus ehitustööd_Sillamäe Eesti... -- 456.4 KB

The tender document contains a technical specification for the construction works of Sillamäe Estonian Primary School's outdoor area, defining the basis documents for the works and design requirements.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for outdoor area construction works at Sillamäe Estonian Primary School is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some practical aspects of e-submission could be improved.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The reference to 'or equivalent' for standards is a positive aspect for legal compliance.

Clarity80/100

The description of works is clear, and requirements are documented through various forms and specifications. Evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting, with cost being the primary factor. Conditions for submission are generally clear.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the contract start date is explicitly stated as presumptive, which slightly reduces completeness. A good number of documents are attached, though some are forms for submission rather than descriptive documents.

Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. Deadlines are reasonable, and criteria are objective (cost-based). E-procurement is utilized. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting fairness.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. A document URL for opening is provided. The contract start date is presumptive, which is a minor practical drawback. Financing information is not explicitly detailed. The duration is specified.

Contract start date is presumptive.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and value are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The structure of the tender information is consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear description of works and requirements.
Reasonable submission deadlines and contract duration.
Objective evaluation criteria (cost-based).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Inclusion of 'or equivalent' for standards.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Presumptive contract start date.
Limited detail on financing.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria into the evaluation or technical requirements.
2. Clarify the contract start date or provide a more definitive timeframe.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline