Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login13 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
3 documents available with AI summaries
Tender document 'Vastavustingimused' in .PDF format (25,839 bytes).
Tartu Student Village is seeking providers for security services and low-current system maintenance for student dormitories, with bids primarily evaluated based on price for various services.
The Procurement Pass, or European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats, but is not intended for completion.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for security and low-current system maintenance services for student dormitories is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable deadline. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects.
The tender appears to comply with standard procurement procedures, including the use of CPV codes and a clear procedure type. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of explicitly detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, though standard practices are assumed.
The description of services is clear, outlining the components of both security and technical maintenance. Requirements for staff qualification are mentioned. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria impacts the overall clarity of the selection process.
Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines. The contract duration is specified (01.05.26 - 30.04.29). However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria and detailed location information for all dormitories could be improved.
The tender is divided into parts based on location, which promotes fairness. E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. The value is disclosed. However, the primary evaluation based on price, without clearly defined qualitative criteria, might favor price-only bids over quality.
The tender supports e-submission and e-procurement. The contract start date is implied by the contract duration (01.05.26). Financing information is not explicitly detailed. The duration of the contract is clear.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data integrity.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the score in this category.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required