Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Construction of roads in the Ermistu defense industry park

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307571
Value
€4,000,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 30, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost (excluding VAT)100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 30, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 30, 2026

Tender Opening

April 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€4,000,000
Duration
14 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of internal roads within the defense industry park and design and construction of access roads. The defense industry park is financed under Measure 21.1.6.3 "Basic infrastructure of the defense industry park" intervention 21.1.6.3.1 "Basic infrastructure of the defense industry park" within the scope of policy objective 1 "Smarter Estonia" specific objective (a)(vii) "Increasing industrial capacity for defense capabilities, prioritizing dual-use capabilities" of the Cohesion Policy Funds Implementation Plan 2021-2027.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender focuses on essential infrastructure for a defense industrial park, prioritizing technical capability and cost-effectiveness. A winning strategy will emphasize proven road construction experience, a robust understanding of the project's unique context (defense industrial park), and a highly competitive price. Proactive risk management and meticulous adherence to all submission requirements are paramount.

Key Winning Messages

Proven Expertise in Defense Infrastructure: We deliver reliable and efficient road construction solutions tailored for sensitive industrial environments.

Cost-Effective Excellence: Our competitive pricing, combined with efficient project management, ensures maximum value for the State Defence Investment Centre.

Unwavering Compliance and Security: We guarantee strict adherence to all tender requirements, including geopolitical restrictions and confidentiality.

Key Opportunities
Leveraging the 'defense industrial park' context to highlight relevant experience and understanding of specific needs.
Focusing on a highly competitive price as the primary evaluation factor.
Utilizing the Hankepass (ESPD) as a streamlined initial submission, allowing for efficient preparation.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria beyond price, making it difficult to optimize for non-price factors.

While price is dominant, ensure all technical and mandatory requirements are met flawlessly. Highlight any past performance or certifications that indirectly demonstrate quality and reliability, even if not explicitly scored.

The tender is for a single bidder and a single connected project, requiring a comprehensive and well-resourced approach from the outset.

Ensure the bid team is fully resourced and capable of managing the entire 14-month project. Conduct thorough due diligence on all aspects of the project to avoid unforeseen issues that could impact cost or schedule.

Potential for high competition due to the nature of public infrastructure projects and the EU funding mechanism.

Conduct thorough market research to identify potential competitors. Develop a compelling value proposition that goes beyond price, even if not explicitly scored, to build confidence in the bidder's capability.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established construction company with a strong track record in civil engineering and road construction projects, particularly those involving industrial or sensitive sites. The ideal bidder will possess significant experience in delivering projects within tight deadlines and budgets, and have a clear understanding of public procurement processes in Estonia. Experience with projects funded by EU cohesion policy funds would be a significant advantage.
Key Requirements
Confirmation of no subcontractors or suppliers associated with the Russian Federation.
Bidder's self-declaration (Hankepass) as initial evidence.
Adherence to confidentiality terms for accessing technical documentation.
Demonstrated technical capability in road construction for industrial parks.
Lowest total cost (excluding taxes) receives maximum score.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience in constructing infrastructure for defense-related or high-security industrial zones.
A highly detailed and realistic project execution plan that addresses potential challenges specific to an industrial park environment.
A proactive approach to risk management, clearly outlining potential issues and mitigation strategies.
A strong understanding of the funding source (EU Cohesion Policy Funds) and its implications for project delivery and reporting.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'Social Aspects: No' is stated, consider a brief mention of commitment to local employment during construction, if feasible, as a positive signal of community engagement, without making it a formal commitment.
Bid Focus Areas
Total Cost (excluding taxes)100% (implied)

Develop a highly competitive and accurate cost estimate. Conduct detailed cost-benefit analysis of construction methods and materials to identify savings without compromising quality. Ensure all direct and indirect costs are accounted for. Consider economies of scale if applicable.

Recommendations6
Scrutinize and Confirm Subcontractor/Supplier Compliance
CriticalHigh effort

Thoroughly vet all potential subcontractors and suppliers to ensure absolutely no association with the Russian Federation. This requires a robust due diligence process beyond a simple declaration.

Prevents mandatory exclusion from the tender.
Optimize for Lowest Price with Realistic Costing
HighHigh effort

Develop a meticulously detailed and competitive cost proposal. Leverage efficient construction methodologies and material sourcing to achieve the lowest possible price while maintaining project quality and scope.

Maximizes score in the primary evaluation criterion.
Highlight Defense Industrial Park Experience
HighMed effort

Emphasize any past experience in constructing infrastructure for industrial parks, especially those with security or defense-related functions. Showcase understanding of the unique requirements of such environments.

Builds confidence in technical capability and suitability for the specific project context.
Master the Hankepass (ESPD)
HighMed effort

Ensure the Hankepass is completed accurately, comprehensively, and in the requested format. This is the primary evidence and must be flawless.

Ensures eligibility and a smooth initial review process.
Proactive Risk Assessment and Mitigation Plan
MediumMed effort

Develop a detailed risk assessment for the project, covering technical, logistical, and geopolitical aspects. Outline clear mitigation strategies for each identified risk.

Demonstrates foresight and preparedness, increasing client confidence.
Strict Adherence to Confidentiality
CriticalLow effort

Ensure all personnel involved understand and strictly adhere to the confidentiality terms for accessing technical documentation. This is a non-negotiable requirement.

Prevents disqualification and maintains trust with the contracting authority.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective yet technically sound provider for specialized industrial infrastructure. Emphasize a streamlined, efficient delivery model that translates into savings for the client. Highlight a deep understanding of the project's strategic importance within the defense sector.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-30 07:00:00.
--The contracting authority does not divide the procurement into lots and will award the contract to a single bidder, as it is a single connected project.
--The bidder's self-declaration (Hankepass) serves as initial evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, containing conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal convictions for money laundering, terrorist financing, child labor, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.
--Bidders must confirm that they will not involve subcontractors or suppliers associated with the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must provide a power of attorney for joint bidders if applicable.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender is for the construction of roads in the Ermistu industrial park.
--The contract duration is 14 months.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total cost of the bids, excluding taxes, will be evaluated, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--The estimated value of the tender is 4,000,000.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307571_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal convictions for money laundering, terrorism financing, child labor, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307571_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.0 KB

The bidder must confirm that they will not involve subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation and submit a joint bidder authorization if applicable.

RHAD Lisa 1 Vastutava isiku erialase töö kogemusDOC
RHAD Lisa 1 Vastutavate isikute erialase töö ... -- 83.9 KB

No summary available for this document.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307571_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The tender evaluates the total bid cost excluding taxes, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307571_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 83.1 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is the bidder's own declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and the format for expected responses.

RHAD Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektDOC
RHAD Lisa 2_Hankelepingu projekt_307571.docx -- 74.2 KB

This document is a draft contract outlining the terms and requirements for the construction of roads at the Ermistu defense industry park.

RHAD Lisa 4 Taotlus ja KonfidentsiaalsustingimusedDOC
RHAD Lisa 4 Taotlus ja Konfidentsiaalsustingi... -- 39.0 KB

This document is an application to access technical documentation and confirm confidentiality terms for the Ermistu defense industrial park road construction tender.

Riigihanke alusdokumendidDOC
Riigihanke alusdokument_307571.rtf -- 2.8 MB

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road construction in the Ermistu defense industrial park is generally well-structured, with clear financial information and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit sustainability criteria and some documentation formats are not machine-readable.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including proper CPV codes and a clear timeline. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the information provided.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview. The evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting, which is understandable. Conditions for participation and contract execution are referenced in various documents.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the financing condition is vague, referencing contract clauses rather than providing direct information. Several key documents are in non-machine-readable formats (.rtf, .xml not fully processed).

Financing condition is vague, referencing contract clauses.
Some critical documents are in non-machine-readable formats.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. The criteria for evaluation (lowest price) are objective. E-submission and e-procurement are mandated. The requirement to exclude suppliers linked to the Russian Federation is a specific condition but not necessarily unfair if justified by national security interests.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are supported. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, only the duration. Financing information is indirect. The contract duration is clearly specified.

Contract start date is not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical and consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions EU funding, which implies adherence to certain EU standards. However, there are no explicit requirements or criteria related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear financial information and estimated value.
Well-defined scope and technical requirements.
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria.
Vague financing condition.
Some key documents in non-machine-readable formats.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific green and social procurement criteria.
2. Clarify the financing condition directly within the tender notice.
3. Ensure all essential documents are provided in machine-readable formats.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline