Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

LIFE LATESTadapt Rakvere pilot area construction works

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307561
Value
€220,100
Location
Estonia
Published
March 13, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of the work100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Tender Opening

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€220,100
Duration
5 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The contracting authority's objective is to reconstruct the outflow of Rakvere Public Garden ponds, open the Tobia main drain, and reduce nitrate content in the Tobia main drain by establishing denitrification filters based on wood chips. Construction will involve establishing nature-based solutions, which will increase the city's flood resistance and improve surface water quality.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

60%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender focuses heavily on cost, with 100% weight on the total bid price. A winning strategy will prioritize aggressive pricing while meticulously adhering to all technical and eligibility requirements, particularly those concerning subcontractor vetting and compliance. Demonstrating a clear understanding of the project's environmental goals, even without explicit green procurement criteria, can offer a subtle differentiator.

Key Winning Messages

The most cost-effective and compliant solution for Rakvere's water infrastructure upgrade.

Reliable execution of nature-based solutions for enhanced flood resilience and water quality.

Unwavering commitment to ethical and compliant supply chain management.

Key Opportunities
Aggressive pricing strategy due to 100% cost evaluation.
Demonstrate understanding of the environmental goals (nitrate reduction, water quality improvement) even without explicit green procurement.
Leverage existing relationships with compliant subcontractors to expedite vetting.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost evaluation.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings without compromising quality or compliance. Explore efficiencies in material sourcing and labor deployment. Consider a slightly lower profit margin if the strategic value of winning this contract is high.

Strict subcontractor vetting requirements and potential delays.

Proactively identify and pre-qualify subcontractors who meet all criteria, especially regarding the exclusion grounds. Have a clear process for obtaining and submitting the Hankepass for all first-round subcontractors well in advance of the deadline.

Potential for bid disqualification due to minor errors in documentation or compliance checks.

Implement a rigorous internal review process for all submitted documents, paying close attention to Vorm 1 Kinnitusevorm.docx and the Hankepass. Ensure all team members are aware of and have signed off on compliance statements.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A financially sound construction company with proven experience in water infrastructure projects, specifically pond reconstruction and water quality improvement. The company must have robust internal processes for vetting subcontractors to ensure compliance with exclusion grounds and a strong track record of delivering projects on time and within budget. Experience with nature-based solutions is a plus.
Key Requirements
Confirmation of no subcontractors/suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
Confirmation of no subcontractors subject to replacement.
Submission of Vorm 1 Kinnitusevorm.docx (work performer qualifications and compliance).
Submission of Mahutabel.xlsx (bill of quantities with detailed prices).
Submission of Hankepass (company's own confirmation/ESPD).
Adherence to the construction project and relevant legislation.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrating a deep understanding of the denitrification filter technology and its long-term effectiveness, even if not explicitly required for technical evaluation.
Presenting a highly detailed and optimized bill of quantities that clearly shows cost-saving measures.
Providing a proactive and transparent approach to subcontractor compliance, highlighting the robustness of the vetting process.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a statement about ensuring fair labor practices and local employment opportunities during the construction phase, framed as a commitment to community benefit.
Bid Focus Areas
Total cost of the work100.0%

Submit the lowest possible compliant bid. Conduct detailed cost engineering to identify all areas for optimization. Ensure all pricing is accurate and reflects the full scope of work.

Recommendations6
Aggressive Costing Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Develop a highly competitive pricing strategy by meticulously analyzing the bill of quantities (Mahutabel.xlsx) and identifying all potential cost efficiencies. This is paramount given the 100% weight on total cost.

Maximizes score for the primary evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Proactive Subcontractor Vetting
CriticalMed effort

Immediately identify and pre-qualify all potential subcontractors, ensuring they meet the strict exclusion grounds (no Russian Federation connections, no risk of replacement). Have their Hankepass ready for submission.

Prevents disqualification and ensures compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds.
Meticulous Documentation for Vorm 1
CriticalMed effort

Ensure Vorm 1 Kinnitusevorm.docx is completed with precise details on the education and work experience of all key personnel, directly aligning with the project's technical requirements.

Ensures compliance with eligibility and technical capability requirements.
Highlight Nature-Based Solution Expertise
MediumLow effort

While not a formal evaluation criterion, subtly emphasize the company's experience and understanding of nature-based solutions for water quality improvement and flood resilience, aligning with the project's stated goals.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver the project's intended outcomes beyond just the construction aspect.
Rigorous Internal Bid Review
CriticalMed effort

Implement a multi-stage internal review process for the entire bid submission, focusing on accuracy, completeness, and compliance with all tender requirements, especially the Hankepass and Vorm 1.

Minimizes the risk of errors leading to disqualification.
Detailed Bill of Quantities Analysis
HighHigh effort

Thoroughly analyze the provided Mahutabel.xlsx template. Identify opportunities for cost savings through efficient material sourcing, optimized construction methods, and accurate labor costings.

Directly impacts the bid price, crucial for the 100% cost evaluation.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most economically advantageous and fully compliant option, emphasizing a lean and efficient operational model. Highlight the company's robust compliance framework to counter potential concerns about subcontractor vetting.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (3)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The tender is conducted as a reversed procedure according to RHS § 52 para 3.
--Bidders must submit a Hankepass (company's own confirmation) as initial proof of meeting the required qualifications and conditions.
--The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds regarding convictions for fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring the submission of the Hankepass for first-round subcontractors.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders must not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
--Bidders must not use subcontractors who would be subject to replacement.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm they do not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
--Bidders must confirm they do not use subcontractors who would be subject to replacement.
--Bidders must submit a confirmation form (Vorm 1 Kinnitusevorm.docx) attesting to the qualification and compliance of the work performers, including the education and work experience of team members.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender seeks a construction company for the reconstruction of Rakvere Rahvaaed park ponds and nitrate reduction through the establishment of denitrification filters, following the provided construction project and legislation.
--Bidders must submit a bill of quantities (Mahutabel.xlsx) with detailed prices for construction works and materials.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total cost of the bids will be evaluated, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307561_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds regarding convictions for fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring first-tier subcontractors to submit a tender pass.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307561_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.4 KB

Bidders must confirm that they will not involve subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation and will not use subcontractors subject to replacement.

Pakkuja esitab ühikhinnatabeli (Mahutabel) (xls)XLS
Mahutabel.xlsx -- 24.9 KB

The bidder must submit a unit price table (bill of quantities) with detailed prices for construction works and materials to participate in the LIFE LATESTadapt Rakvere pilot area construction works tender.

Vorm 1DOC
Vorm 1 Kinnitusevorm.docx -- 24.3 KB

The contracting authority requires the submission of a form confirming the qualifications and compliance of the work executors, including team members' education and work experience.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307561_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The tender evaluates the total cost of bids, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307561_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 71.7 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence of meeting the contracting authority's qualification and condition requirements, but it is not directly filled out as a tender document.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 30.5 KB

The contracting authority seeks a construction company for the reconstruction of Rakvere Rahvaaia pond outlets and nitrate reduction through denitrification filters, adhering to the provided construction project and legal acts.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 48.9 KB

The draft contract project defines the terms, rights, obligations, and work organization for construction works to be fulfilled as a result of the public procurement.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for construction works in Rakvere is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation based on price. However, it lacks explicit sustainability criteria and relies on a reversed procedure which might limit broader participation.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are noted. The financing condition is clearly stated.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, outlining the reconstruction of pond outlets and nitrate reduction. Key requirements such as the bill of quantities and confirmation forms are specified. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is also clear.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. However, the financing condition is described as 'contract attached' rather than a direct summary, and the specific details of the 'Hankepass' are not fully elaborated within the main tender text, requiring reference to attached documents.

Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted as a reversed procedure, which is a specific method. While the evaluation is based on the lowest price, which is objective, the exclusion of bidders connected to the Russian Federation and the requirement for specific subcontractor checks are standard geopolitical measures rather than company-specific tailoring. Full document access is implied through the e-procurement platform.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. The contract duration is specified. Financing is linked to an EU program (LIFE-2021-SAP-CLIMA), which is positive. However, the reliance on specific forms like 'Hankepass' and 'Vorm 1' might require bidders to navigate multiple documents.

Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes.

Sustainability50/100

The project itself has environmental benefits (nitrate reduction, flood resistance, water quality improvement) linked to the LIFE program. However, there are no explicit green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus mentioned beyond the project's inherent nature.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria
No specific social or innovation requirements

Strengths

Clear technical description and objectives
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price)
Financing linked to EU program (LIFE)
Mandatory e-submission

Concerns

Reversed procedure may limit bidder pool
Sustainability aspects are implicit rather than explicit requirements
Reliance on multiple specific forms for qualification

Recommendations

1. Consider adding explicit sustainability or social criteria to future tenders.
2. Ensure all required forms and their purpose are clearly summarized in the main tender document.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline