Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Ordering of landscaping maintenance at Vesilennuki tn 12, Tallinn

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
307551
Value
€168,498
Location
Estonia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Tender price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Tender Opening

April 15, 2026

Contract Start Date

September 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€168,498
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€43,718
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
562 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Ordering of landscaping maintenance at Vesilennuki tn 12, Tallinn
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender is heavily weighted towards price, making cost leadership the primary driver for success. Bidders must demonstrate strong technical capability, particularly through their project manager's qualifications, and meticulously adhere to submission requirements. While social value and innovation are not explicitly requested, integrating them can offer a subtle competitive edge.

Key Winning Messages

Unbeatable Value: Delivering high-quality, reliable landscaping maintenance at the most competitive price.

Expert Project Management: Ensuring seamless execution and client satisfaction through a highly qualified and experienced project manager.

Operational Excellence: Demonstrating efficient processes that translate into cost savings and superior service delivery.

Key Opportunities
Dominating the evaluation criteria through the lowest price.
Leveraging the project manager's qualifications as a key differentiator.
Demonstrating a deep understanding of the site through mandatory familiarization.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings without compromising quality. Explore economies of scale and efficient resource allocation. Consider offering tiered pricing for additional services if feasible.

Potential for many bidders to meet basic technical requirements, leading to price being the sole differentiator.

While price is paramount, ensure all technical requirements are met flawlessly. Highlight the project manager's specific achievements and relevant experience in the proposal to add qualitative weight to the technical submission, even if not directly scored.

Lack of specific details on the 'Tehniline kirjeldus' and 'Kinnisvaraobjekti põhine tehniline kirjeldus' (KOTK) due to file format limitations.

Actively seek out and obtain these documents from the contracting authority. Thoroughly analyze the technical specifications to ensure full compliance and identify any potential hidden costs or complexities.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established landscaping maintenance company with a proven track record in public sector contracts, possessing a highly qualified project manager and efficient operational processes that allow for competitive pricing. The company should be adept at managing large-scale maintenance projects and have robust quality control mechanisms.
Key Requirements
Project manager qualifications (education, professional qualifications, work experience)
Confirmation of specialist work experience at the reference object (Form 5)
Tender price table (Form 3) detailing costs for regular and additional services
Compliance with all submission instructions and deadline
Familiarization with the place of contract performance
Key Discriminators
A meticulously detailed and transparent pricing structure that clearly justifies the lowest bid.
A project manager whose CV and experience directly and demonstrably align with the specific needs of landscaping maintenance at Vesilennuki tn 12, Tallinn, perhaps highlighting experience with similar public sector sites.
A proactive approach to site familiarization, potentially including preliminary observations or suggestions for site-specific improvements (if appropriate and not overly prescriptive).
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly requested, consider a subtle commitment to local employment or using eco-friendly materials/practices. This can be framed as an operational benefit (e.g., reduced waste, local support) rather than a direct social value offering, to align with the tender's focus.
Bid Focus Areas
Tender price100.0%

Submit the absolute lowest viable price. Conduct a rigorous cost-benefit analysis to ensure profitability while remaining the most competitive. Ensure all costs are accurately reflected in Form 3.

Recommendations6
Secure and Showcase Exceptional Project Manager Qualifications
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the nominated project manager possesses the exact educational background, professional qualifications, and extensive work experience in landscaping maintenance as stipulated. Highlight specific projects that mirror the scope and complexity of Vesilennuki tn 12, Tallinn.

Directly meets a critical eligibility requirement and can subtly influence perceived technical capability.
Achieve the Lowest Possible Bid Price
CriticalHigh effort

Perform an exhaustive cost breakdown for all regular and additional landscaping maintenance services. Identify all opportunities for cost optimization through efficient resource management, procurement, and operational planning. Ensure the price submitted in Form 3 is the lowest feasible.

Maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Meticulously Complete All Forms and Declarations
CriticalMed effort

Pay extreme attention to detail when completing Form 2, Form 3, and Form 5, ensuring all information is accurate, consistent, and compliant with tender instructions. Double-check all data for the tender price table.

Avoids disqualification due to administrative errors.
Mandatory Site Familiarization and Documentation Review
HighMed effort

Prioritize attending any scheduled site visits and thoroughly review all provided technical documentation (Tehniline kirjeldus, KOTK). If these documents are not readily available, proactively request them from the contracting authority. Understand the site's specific challenges and requirements.

Ensures a realistic cost estimate and demonstrates commitment, potentially uncovering nuances missed by competitors.
Proactive Communication on Site-Specific Understanding
MediumLow effort

During the site visit or in the proposal, subtly demonstrate a deep understanding of the specific landscaping needs at Vesilennuki tn 12, Tallinn. This could involve noting specific plant types, microclimates, or potential maintenance challenges that your team is uniquely equipped to handle.

Adds qualitative value beyond price, showing a more engaged and competent bidder.
Verify All Mandatory Exclusion Grounds and Eligibility
HighMed effort

Thoroughly review the tender documents for any explicit or implicit mandatory exclusion grounds. Ensure the company and its key personnel meet all eligibility requirements, including those related to legal standing, financial stability, and past performance.

Prevents immediate disqualification.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective provider without compromising on essential quality and reliability. Emphasize operational efficiency and lean management to justify the low price. Highlight the project manager's specific expertise as a guarantee of competent execution, even at a lower price point.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders are invited to submit a bid for landscaping maintenance at Vesilennuki tn 12, Tallinn.
--Bidders must follow electronic submission instructions.
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-15 08:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must comply with the conditions set out in the tender documents.
--Bidders must distinguish trade secrets.
--Bidders must submit declarations in Form 2 and Form 3.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The project manager must have relevant education, professional qualifications, and work experience in landscaping.
--Confirmation of specialist work experience at the reference object for landscaping maintenance work (Form 5).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit a tender price table (Form 3) detailing the cost for regular and additional landscaping maintenance services.
--The tender value is 168498.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307551_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 11.3 KB

Bidders must submit compliance with tender conditions, distinguish trade secrets, provide applications according to Forms 2 and 3, and ensure the project manager meets the requirements.

Vorm 2 – Hankemenetlusel osalemise avaldusDOC
Vorm 2 - Hankemenetlusel osalemise avaldus.do... -- 17.9 KB

This form is an application to participate in the procurement procedure, confirming the bid's compliance with all terms and requirements.

Vorm 3 – Pakkumuse maksumuse tabelXLS
Vorm 3 - Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel.xlsx -- 24.8 KB

Bidders must submit Form 3, detailing pricing for both regular and additional landscaping maintenance services at Vesilennuki tn 12, Tallinn.

Vorm 4 – Projektijuhi poolt allkirjastatud CVDOC
Vorm 4 - Projektijuhi poolt allkirjastatud CV... -- 20.9 KB

The tender requires a Project Manager's CV detailing education, professional certifications, and work experience in landscaping.

Vorm 5 – Tellija kinnitusDOC
Vorm 5 - Tellija kinnitus.docx -- 18.6 KB

This document is a form to confirm a specialist's work experience on the bidder's reference object regarding landscaping maintenance work.

Vorm 8 – Ühise pakkumuse volikiriDOC
Vorm 8 - Ühise pakkumuse volikiri.docx -- 13.7 KB

This document is a power of attorney that designates who will represent a joint bid in the procurement procedure.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307551_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307551_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.5 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not intended for completion.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekDOC
Alusdokument pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.do... -- 45.0 KB

The contracting authority invites bids for landscaping maintenance at Vesilennuki tn 12, Tallinn, following electronic submission guidelines and deadlines.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt_Haljastuse hooldu... -- 106.6 KB

The draft contract includes general and special conditions governing the provision of landscaping maintenance services to Riigi Kinnisvara Aktsiaselts.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for landscaping maintenance is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it could benefit from more explicit sustainability considerations and improved accessibility of technical documents.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission period. No immediate disputes or regulatory non-compliance issues are apparent from the provided data.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is concise and understandable. Key requirements, such as mandatory site familiarization and specific forms for submission, are mentioned. The evaluation criteria are stated as relative weighting, primarily based on cost.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, some technical documents are in formats not directly accessible for analysis, and the 'Proposal for Submission of Tender' is referenced but not fully detailed in the provided text, impacting the completeness of the requirement understanding.

Technical documents in inaccessible formats (.xlsm, .zip)
Reference to 'Proposal for Submission of Tender' without full content
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting transparency. The evaluation is primarily cost-based, which is objective. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. Full document access is generally provided, though some technical files are in less common formats.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, which is practical. The contract start date is specified. However, the accessibility of certain technical documents (e.g., .xlsm, .zip) might pose a practical challenge for bidders needing to fully understand the scope. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Inaccessible technical document formats
Lack of explicit financing details
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. The tender status indicates it is active and not suspended. Dates are logically sequenced, with a reasonable gap between the reveal date and submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is positive. However, there are no specific social aspects or innovation requirements detailed in the provided information. It is not explicitly stated if the tender is EU funded.

Lack of specific social or innovation criteria
Unclear EU funding status

Strengths

Clear e-procurement process
Objective cost-based evaluation
Well-defined CPV code and location
Mandatory site visit requirement

Concerns

Inaccessible technical document formats
Limited detail on sustainability aspects beyond 'Green Procurement'
Missing explicit financing information

Recommendations

1. Ensure all technical documents are provided in universally accessible formats.
2. Elaborate on specific green procurement, social, or innovation objectives.
3. Provide explicit details on financing arrangements if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline