Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Construction of a sanitary sewer at ul. Parkowa in Siewierz – from manhole S1 to manhole S14

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00167379/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Śląskie, Poland
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
60 months
Location
Śląskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of a sanitary sewer at ul. Parkowa in Siewierz – from manhole S1 to manhole S14

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

60%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for sanitary sewer construction in Siewierz presents a straightforward opportunity for experienced civil engineering firms. Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, a strong focus on demonstrating technical capability, competitive pricing, and efficient project delivery will be paramount for success. Proactive engagement with the contracting authority to clarify requirements is advised.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and efficient delivery of essential sanitary infrastructure.

Commitment to quality and long-term asset performance.

Value-driven partnership for municipal development.

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria allows for a broad range of competitive strategies.
The 60-month duration suggests a need for robust project management and resource allocation planning.
The CPV code (45232440-8) clearly defines the scope, allowing for focused technical proposals.
The absence of 'Green Procurement' and 'Social Aspects' requirements simplifies the bid focus, allowing concentration on core technical and commercial aspects.
Key Challenges
Absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize bid scoring.

Proactively engage with the Contracting Authority (Zakład Usług Wodnych i Kanalizacyjnych) to understand their priorities and preferred evaluation approach. Base the bid on demonstrating excellence in all potential evaluation areas (technical, price, experience, timeline adherence).

Lack of detailed tender documents (SWZ) requires significant assumptions and potential for misinterpretation.

Request clarification from the Contracting Authority regarding the SWZ content. Conduct thorough site investigations and risk assessments based on available information and industry best practices. Clearly state any assumptions made in the bid.

High competition is likely due to the straightforward nature of the project and lack of specific differentiators.

Focus on a highly competitive price, coupled with a clear demonstration of technical competence and a robust project execution plan. Highlight any past successful projects of similar scale and complexity.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced civil engineering contractor with a proven track record in municipal infrastructure projects, specifically sanitary sewer construction. The ideal bidder will possess strong project management capabilities, a skilled workforce, robust health and safety protocols, and the financial stability to undertake a 60-month project. Familiarity with Polish construction regulations and local site conditions is a significant advantage.
Key Requirements
Demonstrated technical capability in sanitary sewer construction.
Understanding and adherence to all mandatory exclusion grounds.
Competitive and value-driven pricing.
Clear and concise submission documentation.
Ability to deliver the project within the 60-month duration.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated cost-efficiency through optimized construction methods and material selection.
A detailed and realistic project execution plan that clearly outlines milestones, resource allocation, and risk mitigation strategies.
Strong references from similar municipal infrastructure projects, particularly in Poland.
A proactive approach to site management and stakeholder engagement.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a commitment to local employment and skills development, such as offering apprenticeships or training opportunities for local residents. This can be framed as a positive contribution to the Siewierz community.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability

Provide detailed descriptions of past projects, methodologies, and proposed construction techniques. Emphasize experience with similar pipe materials, trenching, and connection methods. Include CVs of key personnel and evidence of relevant certifications.

Price

Develop a highly competitive and detailed cost breakdown. Ensure all direct and indirect costs are accounted for, but explore opportunities for cost optimization through efficient resource utilization and procurement strategies. Benchmark against similar projects if possible.

Project Management & Timeline

Present a clear, phased project plan with realistic timelines for each stage. Demonstrate robust risk management procedures and contingency planning to ensure on-time completion within the 60-month duration.

Recommendations6
Clarify Tender Documents and Requirements
CriticalMed effort

Actively seek clarification from Zakład Usług Wodnych i Kanalizacyjnych regarding the missing SWZ content and any implicit evaluation criteria. This is crucial for developing an accurate and competitive bid.

Ensures bid is aligned with client expectations, reduces risk of disqualification, and allows for optimized pricing and technical approach.
Develop a Comprehensive Technical Proposal
CriticalHigh effort

Given the lack of specified criteria, assume technical capability will be heavily weighted. Detail proposed construction methods, equipment, quality control measures, and health & safety plans. Showcase relevant past experience with specific examples.

Demonstrates competence and reliability, building client confidence.
Focus on Cost-Effectiveness and Value Engineering
HighMed effort

While price is key, emphasize the 'value' offered. Highlight how proposed methods will ensure long-term durability and minimize future maintenance costs, even if not explicitly requested. Present a detailed and justifiable cost breakdown.

Positions the bidder as a cost-conscious and value-oriented partner.
Conduct Thorough Site Assessment and Risk Analysis
HighMed effort

Perform a detailed site visit and analysis to identify potential ground conditions, access issues, and environmental factors. Document these findings and integrate them into the project plan and risk mitigation strategies.

Reduces unforeseen costs and delays, demonstrates due diligence.
Prepare a Robust Project Execution and Management Plan
HighHigh effort

Develop a detailed plan outlining project phases, timelines, resource allocation, communication protocols, and quality assurance. This demonstrates organizational strength and commitment to timely delivery.

Increases confidence in the bidder's ability to manage a long-term project effectively.
Consider Local Employment/Training Commitment
LowLow effort

Include a voluntary commitment to engage local labor or offer training opportunities. Frame this as a benefit to the Siewierz community, even if not a mandatory requirement.

Can create a positive impression and potentially differentiate from competitors, especially if other bidders do not offer similar commitments.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most reliable and technically proficient bidder by providing exceptionally detailed technical proposals and evidence of past success. Emphasize a proactive approach to project management and risk mitigation. Highlight cost-effectiveness through optimized resource utilization and efficient construction methods, rather than just the lowest price.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information in the text
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de88df-dae3-e1a4-056e-e50001aa9e1f.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the construction of a sewage system on Parkowa Street in Siewierz, Poland, from well S1 to well S14, requiring electronic submission of bids.

Specyfikacja warunków zamówienia SWZ.pdfPDF
Specyfikacja warunków zamówienia SWZ.pdf -- 770.8 KB

No content extracted

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for sewage system construction in Siewierz offers good clarity and fairness but lacks transparency on financial value and specific evaluation criteria. Practicality is moderate due to unconfirmed e-submission details.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures with a clear CPV code and location. Deadlines are present, though their adequacy for the scope requires review. No explicit disputes or regulatory non-compliance are evident. The absence of a reveal date for the full tender documents is a minor procedural gap.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the works is detailed, outlining key stages. However, specific evaluation criteria for bid selection are not disclosed, which impacts overall clarity for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and description is provided. Contract duration is specified. While several key documents are listed, the full tender documents require a reveal date for complete access. The estimated value is notably absent.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing reveal date for full tender documents
Fairness85/100

The tender is largely fair with accessible documents (barring the missing reveal date) and an explicit mention of 'E-Procurement' suggesting a digital submission process. The absence of disclosed evaluation criteria does raise minor concerns about complete transparency in the selection process.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked for 'E-Procurement', suggesting digital submission, but details on the platform or specific e-submission method are not provided, impacting immediate practicality. Financing information and contract start date are not specified.

No e-submission details provided
Financing information not disclosed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV code are consistently populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The contract duration is clearly stated.

Sustainability50/100

The tender incorporates 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, indicating some commitment to sustainability. However, specific social aspects or innovation drivers are not detailed, and it is not explicitly stated as EU funded.

No specific social aspects or innovation focus detailed

Strengths

Clear description of works
Specific CPV code provided
Multiple supporting documents attached
Indication of E-Procurement

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Missing reveal date for full tender documents
Lack of specific e-submission platform details

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value to provide a clearer financial context.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria for bid selection to enhance transparency.
3. Provide clear instructions and platform details for the e-submission process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline