Skip to main content
Tenders

Design and reconstruction of quay no. 1 at Rohuküla port

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307535
Value
€1,500,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 18, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of design and reconstruction works for Rohuküla port pier no. 1 (excluding client reserve and VAT)100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Tender Opening

April 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€1,500,000
Duration
6 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Design and reconstruction works of quay no. 1 at Rohuküla port in accordance with the initial data (including construction and technical requirements) presented in the public procurement documents.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

22 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (11)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (5)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS11
--Bidders must confirm they meet the conditions of the tender documents.
--Bidders must confirm they have reviewed the subject of the contract.
--Bidders must confirm they will engage the required specialists.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders must confirm they meet the conditions of the tender documents.
--Background checks on subcontractors for criminal convictions related to fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must confirm they have reviewed the subject of the contract.
--Bidders must confirm they will engage the required specialists.
--If bidding as a joint offer, a power of attorney for joint bidders must be submitted.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Engagement of required specialists for the project.
--The Geoalus.pdf document provides geological baseline information.
--Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx contains detailed requirements for design and reconstruction works, including scope of work and base documents.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly stated, but implied by the tender value and the use of cost as the sole evaluation criterion.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307535_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will verify subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing to ensure reliable contract performance.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307535_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 11.3 KB

Bidders must confirm compliance with tender document conditions, acknowledge site visit, and include required specialists, submitting a joint bid authorization if applicable.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307535_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307535_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 67.2 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses.

GeoalusPDF
Geoalus.pdf -- 1.6 MB

This Geoalus document is part of the Rohuküla port pier no. 1 design and reconstruction tender, providing geological background information.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 596.8 KB

This technical specification outlines detailed requirements for the design and reconstruction of Rohuküla port pier no. 1, including scope of work and base documents.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 79.3 KB

This document is a draft of the works contract, outlining the contract terms and legal framework for the design and reconstruction of Rohuküla port pier no. 1 public procurement.

Lisa 3 vorm 1 (Objektiga tutvumise ajad)XLS
Lisa 3 Vorm 1 (Objektiga tutvumise ajad).xlsx -- 11.2 KB

The contracting authority is organizing site visits, for which prior registration by 4:00 PM on the working day preceding the visit is mandatory.

Lisa 4 vorm 2 (Volikiri ühispakkuja esindamiseks)DOC
Lisa 4 Vorm 2 (Volikiri ühispakkuja esindamis... -- 15.2 KB

This power of attorney is required to represent a joint bidder in the tender procedure and contract signing, confirming the rights of the authorized representative.

Lisa 5 vorm 3 (Teise ettevõtja nõusolek)DOC
Lisa 5 Vorm 3 (Teise ettevõtja nõusolek).docx -- 17.0 KB

This document is a third-party consent form confirming that the bidder can rely on the other entity's qualifications and that the other entity will participate in the contract execution.

Riigihanke alusdokumendid (üldosa)DOC
Riigihanke alusdokumendid (üldosa).doc -- 65.5 KB

The General Tender Documents (general part) contain the general terms and submission requirements of the tender procedure, which are necessary for submitting a bid.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the design and reconstruction of Rohuküla port pier no. 1 is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies solely on cost for evaluation.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard procurement procedures, including proper CPV codes and a clear process. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are indicated. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the information provided.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements are documented in various attached files, such as the technical specification and geological information. Evaluation criteria are specified, although the sole reliance on cost might be a point of discussion.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the financing information is not explicitly detailed, and while many documents are attached, the specific content of some non-analyzable file types is unknown.

Fairness85/100

The tender offers full document access and discloses the estimated value. The criteria are objective (lowest price), and the process is e-procurement. The decision to award the contract to a single bidder for the entire project is justified by the contracting authority as a measure for efficient resource use, which is acceptable.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, only the duration. Financing information is not detailed. The contract duration is specified.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes, and the dates provided are logical.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded, which limits the score in this category.

No explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation.

Strengths

Clear description of works and location.
Well-defined evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Comprehensive set of supporting documents provided.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria.
Sole reliance on cost as the evaluation criterion.
Missing explicit contract start date.

Recommendations

1. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria into future tenders.
2. Clarify the contract start date in the tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline