Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Reconstruction of Turu street section Ropka road – Ringtee street

Open
Deadline
3 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307525
Value
€165,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 13, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Offer cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€165,000
Duration
2 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
86
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The technical specification of the public procurement is provided in the annex to the base documents.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

60%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for road restoration repair in Tartu is heavily weighted towards cost. A winning strategy will focus on aggressive pricing, meticulous adherence to technical specifications, and robust subcontractor management to mitigate risks. While social value and innovation are absent, demonstrating operational efficiency and reliability will be key differentiators.

Key Winning Messages

Unbeatable Value: Delivering high-quality road repair at the most competitive price.

Reliable Execution: Ensuring seamless project delivery through meticulous planning and proven control mechanisms.

Risk-Free Partnership: Proactively managing all potential risks, including those related to subcontractors and compliance.

Key Opportunities
Aggressive pricing strategy due to 100% cost evaluation.
Demonstrating superior subcontractor vetting and management processes.
Leveraging local knowledge for efficient execution and compliance.
Minimizing administrative overhead due to the single lot structure.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost evaluation.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, optimize material sourcing, streamline labor deployment, and identify potential efficiencies in work processes. Consider a slightly lower profit margin if strategically viable.

Meeting stringent subcontractor control requirements and potential scrutiny.

Develop a comprehensive subcontractor management plan detailing vetting procedures, ongoing monitoring, and clear lines of responsibility. Provide concrete evidence of past successful subcontractor management and compliance.

Ensuring full compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements.

Conduct thorough due diligence on the bidding entity and all key personnel. Prepare all necessary documentation in advance to demonstrate compliance with sanctions, fraud, corruption, and human trafficking regulations.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A local or regional construction company with proven experience in road repair, strong cost control capabilities, established relationships with reliable subcontractors, and a deep understanding of Tartu's specific road infrastructure and regulatory environment. They must also have robust internal controls to address exclusion grounds.
Key Requirements
Detailed technical specifications for road repair works
Adherence to contracting authority's control and acceptance procedures
Completed bid table with detailed cost breakdown
Explanations and evidence regarding subcontractor control (fraud, money laundering, human trafficking)
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements
Adherence to the contract draft (Lepingu projekt.doc)
Key Discriminators
Demonstrably lower cost structure through optimized operations and supply chain management.
A highly detailed and transparent subcontractor management plan that exceeds the minimum requirements.
Proven track record of delivering road repair projects on time and within budget in similar urban environments.
Proactive risk identification and mitigation strategies embedded in the bid.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a commitment to local employment or sourcing from local suppliers if it can be achieved without significantly impacting cost. Frame this as an efficiency benefit (e.g., reduced travel time for local labor).
Bid Focus Areas
Offer cost100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price while ensuring profitability. This requires meticulous cost breakdown, efficient resource allocation, and potentially leveraging economies of scale or competitive material sourcing. Every line item in the Pakkumustabel_Aruküla tee.xlsx must be scrutinized for cost optimization.

Recommendations5
Aggressively Price for Maximum Cost Score
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% cost weighting, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible bid. This requires a deep dive into cost drivers, optimizing material procurement, labor scheduling, and identifying any potential efficiencies in the execution of the technical specifications. The bid table must reflect this aggressive pricing.

Directly maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Develop Robust Subcontractor Control Evidence
CriticalMed effort

Prepare detailed documentation and clear explanations demonstrating how subcontractors will be vetted and controlled to prevent fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking. This should include sample contracts, vetting questionnaires, and monitoring procedures.

Mitigates a key risk and fulfills a critical submission requirement, avoiding potential disqualification.
Meticulously Align Technical Solution with Specifications
CriticalMed effort

Thoroughly review 'Lisa 9 - Tehniline kirjeldus' and 'Lisa 8 – Kontroll- ja vastuvõtutoimingute loetelu'. Ensure the proposed technical solution, materials, and execution methods precisely meet all requirements, including control and acceptance procedures. Any deviation, however minor, could be grounds for rejection.

Ensures compliance with technical requirements, avoiding disqualification and demonstrating capability.
Proactive Compliance Check for Exclusion Grounds
HighMed effort

Conduct an internal audit to ensure the bidding entity and any key partners or subcontractors do not fall under any mandatory exclusion grounds (fraud, corruption, conflicts of interest). Be prepared to provide evidence of compliance.

Prevents disqualification based on mandatory exclusion criteria.
Highlight Operational Efficiency and Local Expertise
MediumLow effort

While not explicitly evaluated, subtly emphasize how your company's operational efficiency, local knowledge of Tartu's infrastructure, and streamlined processes contribute to both cost-effectiveness and reliable execution. This can be woven into the narrative of the bid.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver effectively and efficiently, even if not a direct evaluation factor.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective yet reliable provider. Emphasize the thoroughness of your subcontractor control processes as a key risk mitigation strategy, which might be a weakness for less experienced competitors. Highlight your understanding of Tartu's specific road conditions and regulatory environment.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (10)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS10
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-07 09:00:00.
--The tender is not divided into lots due to technical and economic impracticality of separation, and to avoid management difficulties and additional costs.
--The contract duration is 2 months.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The contracting authority may exclude economic operators if they are subject to fraud, corruption, or conflicts of interest.
--The contracting authority will check for money laundering and human trafficking.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must comply with the conditions of the tender, including sanctions.
--Bidders must define business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must provide detailed technical specifications for road repair works in the section of Ropka tee and Ringtee street in Tartu, as per the technical description.
--Bidders must adhere to the contracting authority's control and acceptance procedures, including required tests and measurements.
--The works are to be constructed in a way that ensures functional integration and meets the overall project objectives.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307525_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds for fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307525_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.9 KB

The contracting authority requires bidders to comply with specific conditions, including sanctions adherence and definition of trade secrets, to ensure the validity of the procurement contract.

KululoendXLS
Pakkumustabel_Aruküla tee.xlsx -- 12.9 KB

The tender document contains a detailed cost breakdown of materials and work volumes for road construction, which the bidder must fulfill.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307525_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307525_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 66.7 KB

The procurement pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, clarifying the contracting authority's conditions and expected responses, but is not intended for completion itself.

AlusdokumentDOC
Alusdokument.docx -- 35.4 KB

This tender document outlines the public procurement for the restoration and repair of Aruküla road, organized by the City of Tartu, aiming to select a general contractor for construction works.

LepinguprojektDOC
Lepingu projekt.doc -- 196.5 KB

The contract draft outlines the contract terms and legal framework necessary for tender submission.

Lisa 8 – Kontroll- ja vastuvõtutoimingute loeteluXLS
Lisa 8_Enimlevinud kontroll_ja_vastuvotu_.xls... -- 68.5 KB

This document outlines the client's control and acceptance procedures, including requirements for contractor-submitted tests and measurements.

Lisa 9 - Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 9 - tehniline kirjeldus_Turu tn.doc -- 352.5 KB

The contracting authority provides a technical specification detailing the requirements for the road repair and renovation works on the section of Ropka tee and Ringtee street in Tartu.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

86
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

Automated quality analysis based on rule-based checks.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Clarity80/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Completeness100/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Fairness100/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Practicality60/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Data Consistency100/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Sustainability0/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Strengths

No specific strengths identified

Concerns

No specific concerns identified

Recommendations

No specific recommendations

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline