Skip to main content
Tenders

Automatic Board Edging Line with Scanner Optimization

Open
Deadline
20 days left
April 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307518
Value
€1,300,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 25, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
The lowest total cost according to the offer90%
Material Feeding Flexibility (Optional)10%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 16, 2026

Tender Opening

April 16, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€1,300,000
Duration
14 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€173,923
Avg. Bids
2.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
89%
160 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Oerzen OÜ is procuring an Automatic Board Edging Line with Scanner Optimization.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--For joint tenders, a power of attorney is required, confirming the appointment of an authorized representative and the joint tenderers' responsibility for contract fulfillment.
--Full offers are required according to the tender document requirements.
--The contracting authority OÜ Oerzen will evaluate offers primarily based on the lowest cost (90% weight) and flexibility of material supply (10% weight).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Exclusion grounds are defined, including tax-related requirements and country of origin restrictions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Sales revenue requirement for the last three years.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must confirm that their automatic board edging line with scanner optimization meets the submitted technical requirements, including raw material type, wood species, dimensions, and automatic operation.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly detailed, but implied through sales revenue requirement.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307518_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 12.3 KB

This document outlines requirements for joint tenders, bid submission conditions, cost presentation, and equivalency that bidders must adhere to.

Annex 1. Technical RequirementsDOC
Oerzen Annex 1 Technical Requirements.docx -- 54.5 KB

Bidders must confirm that their automatic board edging line with scanner optimization meets the specified technical requirements, including raw material type, timber species, dimensions, and automated operation.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307518_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.4 KB

The contracting authority OÜ Oerzen evaluates bids primarily based on the lowest cost (90% weight) and material feeding flexibility (10% weight).

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
307518_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 8.9 KB

This document outlines exclusion grounds, including tax-related requirements and origin country restrictions, and qualification conditions such as sales revenue requirements for the last three years.

Form 1. Joint tenderDOC
Form 1 Joint tender.docx -- 63.4 KB

This document is a power of attorney required for submitting a joint tender, confirming the appointment of an authorized representative and the joint bidders' liability for contract performance.

Procurement DocumentPDF
Procurement Document.pdf -- 600.5 KB

OÜ Oerzen is seeking woodworking equipment to increase production yield and automate manufacturing, requiring complete tenders in accordance with the procurement document's specifications.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an Automatic Board Edging Line with Scanner Optimization is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a defined evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit mention of sustainability aspects and some practical submission details could be clearer.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard procurement procedures, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear, albeit relatively short, submission deadline. No disputes are indicated. The procedure type (MS) suggests a negotiated procedure, which is permissible. The deadlines are reasonable given the complexity implied by the value.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required equipment is clear, and the technical requirements are detailed in an annex. The evaluation criteria are specified with weighting. The conditions for submission and joint tenders are outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including the estimated value, contract duration, and location. Key documents like technical specifications, qualification conditions, and evaluation criteria are attached or referenced. However, the exact nature of 'full offers' and specific financial submission details beyond revenue are not fully elaborated.

Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The evaluation criteria are disclosed with weights, and the value is classified. While sales revenue requirements are standard, they are not overly restrictive. The procedure allows for negotiation, which can enhance fairness if managed transparently.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies electronic submission and e-procurement, which are practical. The contract duration is clear. However, information regarding the contract start date and specific financing details beyond the estimated value is not explicitly provided, impacting overall practicality.

Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated logically. The dates for reveal, submission, and opening are sequential and consistent. No suspensions or disputes are noted, indicating good data integrity.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation requirements. While it is EU funded, this does not automatically imply sustainability considerations within the tender's specific criteria.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria
Absence of social responsibility considerations

Strengths

Clear technical specifications provided
Defined evaluation criteria with weighting
Electronic submission and e-procurement mandated
Good data consistency and logical timelines

Concerns

Limited explicit sustainability considerations
Missing contract start date information
Ambiguity in 'full offers' requirement

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., energy efficiency, material sourcing).
2. Clarify the exact requirements for 'full offers' and provide a definitive contract start date.
3. Consider adding innovation as an evaluation factor if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline