Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Protective helmets

Open
Deadline
23 days left
April 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307490
Value
€7,000,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 30, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of the set (ballistic helmet)100%
Cost of the set (impact-resistant helmet)100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 30, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 27, 2026

Tender Opening

April 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€7,000,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€112,448
Avg. Bids
2.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
98%
182 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The items to be procured are various protective helmets (hereinafter referred to as helmets) as described in the technical specification. As the technical specification contains information that cannot be disclosed, the contracting authority will provide the technical specification only to excluded and qualified tenderers who have submitted a confidentiality declaration in accordance with the procurement documents.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for protective helmets requires strict adherence to technical specifications and a robust demonstration of product quality. Winning requires meticulous preparation of technical documentation, product samples, and conformity certificates, coupled with a clear understanding of the framework agreement's terms. Focus on reliability, compliance, and efficient delivery to secure this contract.

Key Winning Messages

Uncompromising Quality and Compliance: Delivering protective helmets that meet and exceed the stringent technical specifications and conformity requirements.

Reliable Supply Chain and Delivery: Ensuring consistent availability and timely delivery of high-quality protective helmets as per the framework agreement.

Value-Driven Partnership: Offering competitive pricing and a commitment to a long-term, reliable partnership with the Police and Border Guard Board.

Key Opportunities
The tender is for a framework agreement, indicating a potential for long-term supply and follow-on orders, providing stability for the winning bidder.
The estimated value of 7,000,000.0 suggests a significant contract size, offering substantial revenue potential.
While not explicitly stated as 'innovative,' the technical description (though not public) likely contains specific performance requirements that can be leveraged by bidders offering superior or specialized helmet technologies.
Key Challenges
The technical description is not publicly available, requiring bidders to first submit a confidentiality declaration and then meticulously analyze the provided technical specifications.

Promptly submit the confidentiality declaration. Dedicate significant resources to thoroughly understand and map all technical requirements to your product offerings. Engage technical experts to ensure full compliance.

Evaluation criteria are not specified, making it difficult to optimize the bid for specific scoring. This implies a strong emphasis on meeting all mandatory requirements.

Focus on exceeding all stated mandatory technical and eligibility requirements. Ensure all documentation is flawless and directly addresses every point in the technical description and framework agreement. Assume a 'pass/fail' approach for technical compliance and a price-driven evaluation for compliant bids.

The absence of specified duration for the contract could imply flexibility or a need for bidders to propose terms, but more likely suggests it will be defined within the framework agreement.

Carefully review the 'Raamlepingu projekt' for any clauses related to contract duration or renewal. Be prepared to offer competitive pricing that reflects the potential long-term nature of a framework agreement.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A manufacturer or authorized distributor of protective helmets with a proven track record in supplying to public sector or defense organizations. The ideal bidder possesses strong technical expertise, established quality control processes, and the capacity to meet stringent product specifications and provide comprehensive certification. Experience with framework agreements and public procurement procedures in Estonia is highly advantageous.
Key Requirements
Submission of product data corresponding to the technical description of protective helmets.
Submission of manufacturer materials and conformity certificates.
Submission of product samples.
Adherence to the terms and conditions outlined in the draft framework agreement.
Submission of prices for protective helmets (ballistic and impact resistant) and their accessories.
Submission of a confidentiality declaration to access tender documents.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated superior product performance against specific, albeit undisclosed, technical requirements.
Exceptional warranty or after-sales support for the protective helmets.
Proven experience in supplying similar high-specification protective equipment to Estonian or EU public sector entities.
A highly competitive and transparent pricing structure for the helmets and accessories.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'Social Aspects: No' is stated, consider a commitment to ethical sourcing of materials and responsible manufacturing practices as a subtle differentiator. This can be framed as part of overall corporate responsibility and risk management.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Compliance and Product Quality

Ensure every aspect of the submitted product data, manufacturer materials, conformity certificates, and samples directly and unequivocally meets the technical description. Any deviation, however minor, could lead to exclusion. Prioritize accuracy and completeness in all technical submissions.

Framework Agreement Adherence

Thoroughly analyze the 'Raamlepingu projekt' and 'Hankemenetluse läbiviimise lisateave.pdf'. Ensure your proposal and pricing align with the proposed terms, obligations, and components of the agreement. Highlight your understanding and acceptance of these terms.

Pricing

Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, assume pricing will be a significant factor for compliant bids. Develop a competitive pricing strategy that reflects the estimated value and potential volume, while ensuring profitability and covering all costs associated with quality and compliance.

Recommendations7
Prompt Confidentiality Declaration Submission
CriticalLow effort

Immediately submit the required confidentiality declaration to gain access to the crucial technical specifications. This is the gateway to understanding the core requirements.

Enables participation and access to vital tender information.
Meticulous Technical Specification Analysis
CriticalHigh effort

Once received, conduct an exhaustive analysis of the technical description. Map each requirement to your product's capabilities and ensure all supporting documentation (manufacturer materials, certificates) directly addresses these points.

Ensures full compliance and avoids technical disqualification.
Proactive Sample Preparation and Testing
CriticalMed effort

Prepare and rigorously test product samples to ensure they meet all technical specifications. Have multiple samples ready for submission as required.

Provides tangible proof of product quality and compliance.
Framework Agreement Alignment
HighMed effort

Scrutinize the draft framework agreement ('Raamlepingu projekt') and the additional information document. Ensure your bid and proposed terms are fully aligned with the contracting authority's expectations and obligations.

Demonstrates understanding and commitment to the contractual relationship.
Highlight Proven Track Record
MediumLow effort

If applicable, emphasize past successful supply of similar protective equipment to public sector or defense clients, showcasing reliability and quality assurance.

Builds trust and credibility with the contracting authority.
Develop Competitive and Compliant Pricing
HighMed effort

Given the unspecified evaluation criteria, develop a pricing strategy that is both competitive and fully accounts for the costs of meeting all technical and quality requirements. Avoid underpricing that could compromise quality or profitability.

Maximizes chances of winning on price for compliant bids.
Thorough Document Review and Quality Assurance
HighMed effort

Implement a rigorous internal review process for all submitted documents, including technical data, certificates, and pricing, to eliminate any errors or omissions before submission.

Minimizes risk of disqualification due to administrative or technical errors.
Competitive Positioning
Position your bid as the most reliable and compliant supplier, emphasizing your ability to consistently meet stringent technical specifications and deliver high-quality protective helmets.
Highlight your manufacturing or distribution capabilities and your commitment to a long-term partnership, aligning with the framework agreement structure.
If possible, subtly showcase any unique product features or certifications that, while not explicitly requested as innovative, might offer superior performance or durability within the technical parameters.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--The "Hankepass" document outlines the contracting authority's conditions and expected response format, but is not for completion.
--Additional information on conducting the procurement procedure, including technical specifications, participation conditions, and proposal submission suggestions, is available in "Hankemeneltuse labiviimise lisateave.pdf".
--The draft framework agreement defines the terms of the state procurement of protective helmets, the obligations of the parties, and the components of the agreement.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None specified in provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Applicants must submit a confidentiality declaration to access tender documents and participate.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit product data corresponding to the technical description of protective helmets.
--Bidders must submit manufacturer materials and conformity certificates.
--Bidders must submit product samples.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--None specified in provided documents.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307490_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 26.0 KB

The bidder must submit product data for protective helmets that comply with the technical description, manufacturer's materials, and proof of compliance with standards, as well as a product sample.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307490_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 7.5 KB

Bidders must submit prices for protective helmets (ballistic and impact-resistant) and their accessories, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307490_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 74.1 KB

The procurement passport is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not intended for completion.

Hankemenetluse läbiviimise lisateavePDF
Hankemeneltuse labiviimise lisateave.pdf -- 587.5 KB

This document provides additional information on conducting the procurement procedure, including technical specifications, participation conditions, and the proposal for submitting an offer, necessary for qualified applicants.

Konfidentsiaalsusdeklaratsioon - TAOTLUSES ESITAMISEKS!DOC
Konfidentsiaalsusdeklaratsioon.docx -- 20.3 KB

Applicants must submit a confidentiality declaration to access tender documents and participate in the "Protective Helmets" public procurement.

Raamlepingu projektPDF
Raamlepingu projekt.pdf -- 706.2 KB

This framework agreement draft outlines the terms and conditions, parties' obligations, and components of the public procurement for protective helmets.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for protective helmets is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable process, though it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some practical submission details.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines are reasonable. The use of electronic submission and e-procurement aligns with modern regulations.

Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement is clear, and the requirements are documented. The evaluation criteria are specified with relative weighting. Conditions for accessing technical specifications are clearly outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, deadlines, and duration of tender validity. However, the contract duration is not explicitly specified, which is a notable omission.

Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness by disclosing the estimated value and using objective criteria (lowest price for helmets). Full document access is conditional on a confidentiality declaration, which is standard for sensitive information. E-procurement is utilized.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are mandated. However, the specific contract start date is not provided, and while financing is implied by the estimated value, explicit details are absent. The lack of a specified contract duration also impacts practicality.

Contract start date not specified
Financing details not explicit
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear technical and eligibility requirements
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission
Objective evaluation criteria (price-based)
Well-defined CPV code and organizational details

Concerns

Missing contract duration
Confidentiality declaration required for technical specifications
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify the contract duration clearly.
2. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria into the evaluation.
3. Provide clearer information on financing arrangements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline