Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Provision of Water Park Services at Kirikumäe Lake

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
307482
Value
€18,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 13, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Water park service cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Tender Opening

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€18,000
Duration
2 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€87,523
Avg. Bids
2.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
89%
82 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of this public procurement is the provision of water park services at Kirikumäe Lake in Kirikumäe village, Võru municipality. The objective of the procurement procedure is to conclude a concession agreement under which the service provider will offer water park services at Kirikumäe Lake. The municipal government does not guarantee a fixed number of clients to the service provider under the concession agreement.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for a water park concession at Kirikumäe lake is heavily weighted towards price. A winning strategy will focus on delivering the lowest possible cost to the contracting authority while ensuring operational feasibility and client satisfaction. Leveraging existing infrastructure or low-overhead operational models will be crucial for competitive pricing.

Key Winning Messages

The most cost-effective and operationally sound water park solution for Kirikumäe lake.

Maximizing value for Võru Vallavalitsus through a low-risk, high-return concession.

Key Opportunities
Dominant focus on price in evaluation criteria (100% weight).
Opportunity to propose a lean and efficient operational model due to no guaranteed client numbers.
Short contract duration (2 months) suggests a focus on seasonal or temporary setup.
Key Challenges
The contracting authority does not guarantee client numbers, creating revenue risk for the bidder.

Develop a robust pricing strategy that accounts for potential low visitor numbers. Focus on attractions and services that can attract visitors independently and consider partnerships with local tourism providers. Clearly articulate the risk mitigation strategies in the bid.

Intense price competition due to 100% weight on cost.

Thoroughly analyze all cost components and identify areas for optimization. Explore cost-saving measures in equipment, staffing, and marketing. Consider a phased approach to investment if feasible.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced operator of seasonal recreational facilities or water-based attractions with a proven track record of cost-effective operations. This bidder should have a lean operational model and potentially access to cost-effective equipment or a flexible staffing solution. They must be capable of self-financing initial setup and operations without guaranteed revenue from the contracting authority.
Key Requirements
Adherence to technical specifications in 'Lisa1_Veepargi teenuse tehniline kirjeldus.docx'
Provision of a list of attractions as per 'vastavustingimused.pdf'
Submission of cost proposal using 'Lisa_2_Maksumuse_vorm.xlsx', including one-time fee for contracting authority and client fees
Completion and submission of 'Hankepass' (ESPD) with all required conditions and response formats
Capability to offer a water park service at Kirikumäe lake
Key Discriminators
A demonstrably lowest-cost proposal that still meets all technical and operational requirements.
A clear and compelling operational plan that minimizes risk for the contracting authority despite the lack of guaranteed client numbers.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a commitment to local employment during the operational period, especially for seasonal staff. This can be a subtle differentiator if competitors do not address it.
Bid Focus Areas
Water park service cost100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible cost for the one-time fee to the contracting authority and client fees. This requires meticulous cost analysis and identification of all potential savings. Utilize the provided 'Lisa_2_Maksumuse_vorm.xlsx' to present a highly competitive financial offer. Consider economies of scale if the bidder operates multiple similar facilities.

Recommendations6
Aggressively Price for the Lowest Cost
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% weighting on cost, the primary focus must be on submitting the absolute lowest viable price. This involves a detailed cost breakdown, identifying all potential efficiencies, and potentially accepting a lower profit margin to secure the contract. Ensure the cost proposal in 'Lisa_2_Maksumuse_vorm.xlsx' is meticulously prepared.

Directly maximizes score for the most critical evaluation criterion.
Thoroughly Review Technical Specifications and Attraction List
CriticalMed effort

Ensure complete compliance with 'Lisa1_Veepargi teenuse tehniline kirjeldus.docx' and 'vastavustingimused.pdf'. Any deviation or omission could lead to disqualification. Detail how proposed attractions meet or exceed these requirements.

Ensures bid is compliant and avoids disqualification.
Master the Hankepass (ESPD)
CriticalMed effort

The 'Hankepass' is the bidder's self-declaration. Ensure it is completed accurately and comprehensively, addressing all conditions set by the contracting authority and adhering to the expected response format as per 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega'. This is the initial proof of eligibility and capability.

Crucial for bid eligibility and initial impression.
Develop a Robust Revenue Risk Mitigation Plan
HighMed effort

Since client numbers are not guaranteed, the bid must clearly outline strategies to attract visitors and manage revenue fluctuations. This could include innovative marketing, partnerships, or flexible pricing models. Explicitly address this risk and your mitigation strategies.

Demonstrates foresight and operational resilience, increasing confidence in the bid.
Highlight Operational Efficiency and Lean Model
MediumLow effort

Given the short duration and no guaranteed clients, emphasize how your operational model is lean, efficient, and requires minimal upfront investment or ongoing fixed costs. This reinforces the low-cost proposal and minimizes perceived risk for the authority.

Positions the bidder as a low-risk, high-value partner.
Clarify Ambiguities in Tender Documents
MediumLow effort

If any part of the technical specifications, attraction requirements, or submission instructions is unclear, proactively seek clarification from Võru Vallavalitsus through the official channels before the deadline. This ensures accurate bidding and avoids misinterpretations.

Prevents costly errors and ensures bid accuracy.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most financially attractive and operationally straightforward solution for Võru Vallavalitsus. Emphasize the ability to deliver a quality water park service at the lowest possible cost, thereby maximizing the value for the municipality and its residents, even without guaranteed visitor numbers.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bids must be submitted to Võru Vallavalitsus.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-02 12:00:00.
--The tender documentation (HD) contains instructions for submitting the bid for the water park service.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific exclusion grounds mentioned in the provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Must be a service provider capable of offering a water park service at Kirikumäe lake.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must adhere to the technical specifications outlined in "Lisa1_Veepargi teenuse tehniline kirjeldus.docx".
--Must provide a list of attractions for the water park service as per "vastavustingimused.pdf".
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The total value of the tender is 18000.0 EUR.
--Bidders must submit their cost proposal using the form provided in "Lisa_2_Maksumuse_vorm.xlsx".
--The cost proposal must include the one-time fee for the contracting authority and fees charged to clients.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307482_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 4.0 KB

This document outlines conditions for joint bids, bid submission, and cost presentation, along with requirements for the list of attractions for the water park service provision.

Lisa 2_maksumuse vorm .XLS
Lisa_2_Maksumuse_vorm.xlsx -- 10.9 KB

Bidders must submit the cost form for the water park service offering, detailing both the one-time fee from the contracting authority and the fees to be charged to customers.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307482_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on the cost of the water park service, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307482_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.2 KB

The procurement passport (ESPD) is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as an initial proof instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus (TK)DOC
Lisa1_Veepargi teenuse tehniline kirjeldus.do... -- 29.3 KB

The contracting authority seeks a service provider to offer a water park service at Kirikumäe lake, with specific technical descriptions and funding conditions.

Hankedokument (HD)DOC
Pakkumuse_kutse(HD)_veepark.docx -- 32.4 KB

The tender document (HD) provides instructions for submitting an offer for the provision of water park services at Kirikumäe lake to the Võru Rural Municipality Government.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for water park services at Kirikumäe lake is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and fair evaluation criteria, though it lacks specific sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard legal procedures, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear, if standard, procurement process. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope. No immediate disputes or regulatory issues are flagged.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service and the objective are clear. Requirements are documented, and the primary evaluation criterion is specified. Conditions for contract performance are referenced to a draft contract.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like technical specifications and cost forms are attached or referenced. However, the scope of 'performance conditions' is broad, referencing a draft contract without full detail here.

Fairness85/100

The tender offers full document access and discloses the estimated value. The evaluation is based on objective criteria (lowest price wins). E-submission and e-procurement are standard. No requirements appear to be tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-submission and provides URLs for key documents. The contract duration is clear. Financing is described in terms of payment conditions rather than specific budget allocations.

Financing information could be more detailed beyond payment terms.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical and consistent.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender does not state if it is EU-funded.

Lack of sustainability considerations (green procurement, social aspects, innovation).

Strengths

Clear objective and service description
Objective evaluation criteria (lowest price)
Mandatory use of e-submission/e-procurement
Adequate documentation availability

Concerns

Limited detail on financing conditions
Absence of sustainability criteria
Broad reference to performance conditions via draft contract

Recommendations

1. Consider incorporating specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social benefits).
2. Provide more detailed information on financing beyond the payment structure.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline